You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Henrik Vendelbo <hv...@bluprints.com> on 1999/10/14 13:39:28 UTC

apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/lib apr_cpystrn.c

roll our own cpystrn, makes sense, but what about the inlined (inserted,no function call, expanded by compiler to specialized machinecode) standard string copy functions, they supposedly work much faster.

Do we have any assessment on what difference in apache performance there is. I'm sure that it does a lot of string juggling, but it might not matter.

\Henrik