Advantages of other frameworks

[John Nicholas <ja...@mobosplash.com>]

This was at the end of another thread and didn't get any response so I'm 
moving it into a new thread.

John Nicholas


 >> -----Original Message-----
 >> From: James Mitchell [mailto:jmitchtx@telocity.com] I'm not here to
 >> argue about Struts' performance.  Anyone who chooses another
 >> framework over Struts either doesn't need Struts or they don't know
 >> what it
 >> has to offer.  I have yet to meet anything that comes close to what
 >> this framework can do

> Andrew Hill wrote:
> 
>> Barracuda?
>>.
>>
> John Nicholas wrote: 
> Maybe this should be in it's own thread but I would be interested in 
> advantages that other frameworks may offer. I hate seeing people get too 
> much in the 'home team' mentality rather than the 'best tool for the 
> job' mentality. I like struts and am in the middle of my 3rd project 
> with it but I can't believe it's the best tool for every possible web 
> publishing job.
> 
> Struts seems very focused on form handling and is perfect for web 
> applications but what about a large brochure site? I would think another 
> framework (like cocoon) might work better for a site that needs to 
> manage 100s or 1000s of detailed pages but has little user input.I could 
> see how tapestry or xmlc might work better where html designers are 
> going to be working on the site more than programmers.
> 
> I'd like to see comments like Framework X is better than Struts where 
> you have situations Y and Z.
> 
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>