You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bval.apache.org by Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> on 2017/10/19 19:23:02 UTC
[DISCUSSION] BVal on git?
Hi all,
We have discussed this before, but I'd like to propose once again that we
consider migrating BVal's source control to git. I expect most of our
community has moved away from SVN for most of our open source involvement,
as I have, and I personally quite miss git when I'm forced to work without
it. I am aware of git-svn, but when I have tried to make sense of it I have
had no luck. Finally, there is some feeling that dvcs systems like git, and
particularly the tooling around them e.g. GitHub, encourages participation
in projects, and I hope we're all well aware that that would be a welcome
side effect of the proposed move.
Opinions?
Matt
Re: [DISCUSSION] BVal on git?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 if we have all the github links asf created, users love it in general
Le 19 oct. 2017 22:10, "Daniel Cunha" <da...@apache.org> a écrit :
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-10-19 21:23 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > We have discussed this before, but I'd like to propose once again
> that
> > we
> > > consider migrating BVal's source control to git. I expect most of our
> > > community has moved away from SVN for most of our open source
> > involvement,
> > > as I have, and I personally quite miss git when I'm forced to work
> > without
> > > it. I am aware of git-svn, but when I have tried to make sense of it I
> > have
> > > had no luck. Finally, there is some feeling that dvcs systems like git,
> > and
> > > particularly the tooling around them e.g. GitHub, encourages
> > participation
> > > in projects, and I hope we're all well aware that that would be a
> welcome
> > > side effect of the proposed move.
> > >
> > > Opinions?
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] BVal on git?
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
+1
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2017-10-19 21:23 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi all,
> > We have discussed this before, but I'd like to propose once again that
> we
> > consider migrating BVal's source control to git. I expect most of our
> > community has moved away from SVN for most of our open source
> involvement,
> > as I have, and I personally quite miss git when I'm forced to work
> without
> > it. I am aware of git-svn, but when I have tried to make sense of it I
> have
> > had no luck. Finally, there is some feeling that dvcs systems like git,
> and
> > particularly the tooling around them e.g. GitHub, encourages
> participation
> > in projects, and I hope we're all well aware that that would be a welcome
> > side effect of the proposed move.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
--
Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: [DISCUSSION] BVal on git?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-10-19 21:23 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org>:
> Hi all,
> We have discussed this before, but I'd like to propose once again that we
> consider migrating BVal's source control to git. I expect most of our
> community has moved away from SVN for most of our open source involvement,
> as I have, and I personally quite miss git when I'm forced to work without
> it. I am aware of git-svn, but when I have tried to make sense of it I have
> had no luck. Finally, there is some feeling that dvcs systems like git, and
> particularly the tooling around them e.g. GitHub, encourages participation
> in projects, and I hope we're all well aware that that would be a welcome
> side effect of the proposed move.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Matt
>