You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Gary Gregory (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/27 19:05:04 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-1084) Misleading StatusLogger WARN event in LogManager with java.util.Map

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gary Gregory resolved LOG4J2-1084.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.4

Phillip,

Thank you for your report and patch.

A fix is now is Git master.

Please verify and close this ticket.

Gary

> Misleading StatusLogger WARN event in LogManager with java.util.Map
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1084
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 2.3
>            Reporter: Philipp Schneider
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: easyfix
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> In the class org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager in the API package there is a logical problem with finding the factory.
> In the static initialization block starting at line 70 you try to create a factory instance from the factory class specified in the property "log4j2.loggerContextFactory". If that fails you try to find the class in all the supplied providers.
> The problem comes in line 104. You check whether the list of factories is empty and if it is not you automatically assume that there is more than 1 provider which has that class.
> Because of this I get the following logging entries on each startup:
> WARN StatusLogger Multiple logging implementations found: 
> Factory: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory, Weighting: 10
> Using factory: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory
> As you can see, it clearly outputs only a single possible factory and also uses that one.
> Hope to see this fixed in 2.4 since it is really a minor issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org