You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/09/17 23:47:43 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] andygrove opened a new pull request #8213: ARROW-10034: [Rust] Fix Rust build on master

andygrove opened a new pull request #8213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213


   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [arrow] andygrove commented on pull request #8213: ARROW-10034: [Rust] Fix Rust build on master

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
andygrove commented on pull request #8213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213#issuecomment-694567725


   build error seems unrelated so I am going to go ahead and merge this
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [arrow] andygrove closed pull request #8213: ARROW-10034: [Rust] Fix Rust build on master

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
andygrove closed pull request #8213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213


   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [arrow] jorgecarleitao commented on pull request #8213: ARROW-10034: [Rust] Fix Rust build on master

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
jorgecarleitao commented on pull request #8213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213#issuecomment-694602195


   Thanks a lot for the quick response on solving this.
   
   One was related to a new trait in Arrow, `StringArrayOps`, that has `.value(i) -> &str`, and is needed when using `value` in strings, in the commit for `take`.
   
   The other one is related to the `Ops` in logical plans.
   
   Essentially, this is all related to multiple merges, with backward incompatible changes on them.
   
   @andygrove , is there anything we can do to help mitigating this during merge of multiple merges?
   
   One idea is to have a WARNING in the PR text that the merge is backward incompatible, so that the committer knows of potential conflicts with other merges.
   
   Another idea is to first perform the merges locally, one by one, and then push a branch with those changes to test them in integration, and then merge them at once.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [arrow] andygrove commented on pull request #8213: ARROW-10034: [Rust] Fix Rust build on master

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
andygrove commented on pull request #8213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213#issuecomment-694932213


   I think I will start testing each PR locally now, after merging latest from
   master.
   
   There is quite a bit of process in place so it is important that PRs are
   merged to master individually.
   
   On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 7:55 PM Jorge Leitao <no...@github.com> wrote:
   
   > Thanks a lot for the quick response on solving this.
   >
   > One was related to a new trait in Arrow, StringArrayOps, that has .value(i)
   > -> &str, and is needed when using value in strings, in the commit for take
   > .
   >
   > The other one is related to the Ops in logical plans.
   >
   > Essentially, this is all related to multiple merges, with backward
   > incompatible changes on them.
   >
   > @andygrove <https://github.com/andygrove> , is there anything we can do
   > to help mitigating this during merge of multiple merges?
   >
   > One idea is to have a WARNING in the PR text that the merge is backward
   > incompatible, so that the committer knows of potential conflicts with other
   > merges.
   >
   > Another idea is to first perform the merges locally, one by one, and then
   > push a branch with those changes to test them in integration, and then
   > merge them at once.
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213#issuecomment-694602195>, or
   > unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHEBREOAR5VEFXSRKRONFLSGK42NANCNFSM4RRFKIAA>
   > .
   >
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [arrow] andygrove commented on pull request #8213: ARROW-10034: [Rust] Fix Rust build on master

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
andygrove commented on pull request #8213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8213#issuecomment-694559769


   @jorgecarleitao fyi


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org