[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-5809) Not able to deploy Vm becasue of crossing pool.storage.allocate d.capacity.disablethreshold even though the threshold has not been reached in the primary store.

["edison su (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-5809.
-----------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

It's by design, when planning for the storage resource, we always use virtual size instead of physical size, as the each vm could use up all the virtual size during vm's life time, we have to pre-allocate virtual size for each volume.

> Not able to deploy Vm becasue of crossing pool.storage.allocate d.capacity.disablethreshold even though the threshold has not been reached in the primary store.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-5809
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5809
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>    Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>         Environment: Build from 4.3
>            Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan
>            Assignee: edison su
>             Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.5.0
>
>
> Not able to deploy Vm because of crossing pool.storage.allocate d.capacity.disablethreshold even though the threshold has not been reached in the primary store.
> Steps to reproduce the problem:
> Xenserver set up with 2 Xensserver hosts:
> In my case , Primary storage NFS has 222GB . (storage.overprovisioning.factor is set to 2).
> I tried to deploy 20 Vms with the same template that has Virtual size of 20.00 GB and actual size is about 10 GB. 
> I was allowed to deploy only 17 Vms after which Vm deployment fails because of the following exception because of crossing pool.storage.allocate d.capacity.disablethreshold :
> 2014-01-06 17:34:21,881 DEBUG [c.c.s.StorageManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-32:ctx-2a944d7f ctx-6e9eaab0) Checking pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 2
> 37777190912, usedBytes: 88645566464, usedPct: 0.3728093772325169, disable threshold: 0.85
> 2014-01-06 17:34:21,885 DEBUG [c.c.s.StorageManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-32:ctx-2a944d7f ctx-6e9eaab0) Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [V
> ol[24|vm=24|ROOT]], maxSize : 475554381824, totalAllocatedSize : 394411376640, askingSize : 21474836480, allocated disable threshold: 0.85
> 2014-01-06 17:34:21,886 DEBUG [c.c.s.StorageManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-32:ctx-2a944d7f ctx-6e9eaab0) Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1
> for volume allocation: [Vol[24|vm=24|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 0.8745292421128761 has crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocate
> d.capacity.disablethreshold: 0.85, skipping this pool
> Since Xenserver uses thin provisioning ,  the base copy of the template in primary is 10 GB. All the vhd entries of the Vms are very small and point to the base copy. We need to allocate only 10 GB space ( 20 GB (virtual size of template) - 10 gb ( actual size of tenplate)  for each of these Vms , in addition to 10 GB for the base template copy.
> But we are allocating 20 GB for each of the Vms deployed.
> Reported Primary Storage capacity - 82 % - 367.32 GB / 442.89 GB



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)