You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/10/20 22:21:57 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37100] -
SEGV in mod_proxy_ajp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100
william.barker@wilshire.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tomcat-
| |dev@jakarta.apache.org
------- Additional Comments From william.barker@wilshire.com 2005-10-20 22:21 -------
> Sorry, but you are confusing me. I guess you mean ((ajp_msg_t *)conn->data)-
>buf
> instead of conn->data->buffer. ((ajp_msg_t *)conn->data)->buf gets allocated
out
> of the request pool. This pool and thus the buffer remain valid for the
livetime
> of the request. In line 212 conn->data is set to NULL. As we only use
My bad. I didn't read the warning about the style-cleanup until too late,
tried to fix the patch by hand, and didn't do a good job :(. Getting a nice,
pretty, new copy of httpd and applying the patch works very well.
> I admit it is a bandaid until we have an improved protocol. The questions are
> - Can we live with this bandaid
> - When do we get the protocol update
Well, Mladen wants to get started on mod_jk-1.3, so it seems like a good time.
> > It wouldn't be that hard
> > to add a CMD_AJP13_FLUSH to Tomcat (with a Tomcat configuration option to
turn
> > it off so it doesn't freak-out mod_jk :). But as Will says, that
discussion
> > belongs on dev@tomcat.
> >
> Yes, this belongs to dev@tomcat. Are you willing to introduce this
discussion to
> dev@tomcat? That would be very nice. On the other hand from my personal
point of
> view I do not think that it is a good idea to extend the Tomcat connectors in
> this way without having this in a spec of an AJP protocol whatever version it
> has. This would subvert the AJP spec.
Adding dev@tomcat to the CC list to start a discussion :).
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org