You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> on 2019/11/01 15:47:24 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
+1 (Binding)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
<mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now resolved.
>
> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> check it and vote accordingly.
>
> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client..
>
> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
>
> The files can be grabbed
> from:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
>
> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
>
>
> Regards,
> Michael
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Sorry, I meant for Artemis Native vote, sorry for the cross meaning.
Regards
JB
On 06/11/2019 18:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you
> actually did cast the first vote in the thread.
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree with Robbie.
>>
>> I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would
>> like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a
>> vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member).
>>
>> However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close
>> the vote.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
>>> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
>>> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
>>> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
>>>
>>> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
>>> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
>>> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
>>> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
>>> expect its the former though.
>>>
>>> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
>>> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>>
>>> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
>>> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
>>> which if cast would get the required 3.
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
>>>> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
>>>>
>>>> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
>>>> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
>>>> Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
>>>>
>>>> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
>>>> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes
>>>> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
>>>> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
>>>>
>>>> It also says:
>>>>
>>>> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all
>>>> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet
>>>> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all
>>>> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their
>>>> own platform.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi PMC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Get Outlook for Android
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
>>>>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (Binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
>>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
>>>>>>> check it and vote accordingly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
>>>>> client..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
>>>>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
>>>>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The files can be grabbed
>>>>>>> from:
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you
actually did cast the first vote in the thread.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Robbie.
>
> I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would
> like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a
> vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member).
>
> However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close
> the vote.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
> > +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
> > have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
> > is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
> >
> > I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
> > not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
> > obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
> > votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
> > expect its the former though.
> >
> > This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
> > the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
> > I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
> > Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
> > which if cast would get the required 3.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
> >> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
> >>
> >> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
> >> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
> >> Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
> >>
> >> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
> >> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes
> >> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
> >> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
> >>
> >> It also says:
> >>
> >> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all
> >> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet
> >> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all
> >> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their
> >> own platform.
> >>
> >> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
> >>
> >> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
> >>
> >>
> >> Justin
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi PMC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Get Outlook for Android
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
> >>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (Binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> >>>> resolved.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> >>>>> check it and vote accordingly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
> >>> client..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> >>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> >>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The files can be grabbed
> >>>>> from:
> >>>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Michael
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Clebert Suconic
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi,
I agree with Robbie.
I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would
like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a
vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member).
However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close
the vote.
Regards
JB
On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
>
> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
> expect its the former though.
>
> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
> which if cast would get the required 3.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
>> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
>>
>> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
>> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
>> Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
>>
>> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
>> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes
>> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
>> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
>>
>> It also says:
>>
>> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all
>> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet
>> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all
>> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their
>> own platform.
>>
>> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
>>
>> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
>>
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi PMC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Get Outlook for Android
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
>>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (Binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
>>>> resolved.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
>>>>> check it and vote accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
>>> client..
>>>>>
>>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
>>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
>>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
>>>>>
>>>>> The files can be grabbed
>>>>> from:
>>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
>>>>>
>>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Michael Pearce <mi...@apache.org>.
+1 Binding (just so its clear for the records)
As now have 3 bindings, i will shortly send the result mail.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:13, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
>
> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
> expect its the former though.
>
> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
> which if cast would get the required 3.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
> > you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
> >
> > For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
> > positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
> > Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
> >
> > So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
> > received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC
> votes
> > are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
> > incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
> >
> > It also says:
> >
> > Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download
> all
> > signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they
> meet
> > all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate
> all
> > cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on
> their
> > own platform.
> >
> > I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
> >
> > Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi PMC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Get Outlook for Android
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux
> box
> > > and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (Binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are
> now
> > > > resolved.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release,
> please
> > > > > check it and vote accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
> > > client..
> > > > >
> > > > > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > > > > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > > > > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to
> nuget.
> > > > >
> > > > > The files can be grabbed
> > > > > from:
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the clarification, Robbie. The link you provided was helpful.
Cheers!
Justin
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:13 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
>
> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
> expect its the former though.
>
> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
> which if cast would get the required 3.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
> > you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
> >
> > For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
> > positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
> > Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
> >
> > So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
> > received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC
> votes
> > are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
> > incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
> >
> > It also says:
> >
> > Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download
> all
> > signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they
> meet
> > all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate
> all
> > cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on
> their
> > own platform.
> >
> > I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
> >
> > Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi PMC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Get Outlook for Android
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux
> box
> > > and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (Binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are
> now
> > > > resolved.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release,
> please
> > > > > check it and vote accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
> > > client..
> > > > >
> > > > > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > > > > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > > > > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to
> nuget.
> > > > >
> > > > > The files can be grabbed
> > > > > from:
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
+1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
expect its the former though.
This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
which if cast would get the required 3.
Robbie
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
>
> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
> Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
>
> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes
> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
>
> It also says:
>
> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all
> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet
> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all
> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their
> own platform.
>
> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
>
> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hi PMC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Get Outlook for Android
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
> > and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (Binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> > > resolved.
> > > >
> > > > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> > > > check it and vote accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
> > client..
> > > >
> > > > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > > > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > > > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
> > > >
> > > > The files can be grabbed
> > > > from:
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes
are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
It also says:
Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all
signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet
all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all
cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their
own platform.
I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
Justin
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <mi...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi PMC
>
>
>
>
> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
>
>
>
>
> Best
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (Binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> > resolved.
> > >
> > > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> > > check it and vote accordingly.
> > >
> > > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
> client..
> > >
> > > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
> > >
> > > The files can be grabbed
> > > from:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> > >
> > > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by mi...@me.com.INVALID.
Hi PMC
Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> resolved.
> >
> > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> > check it and vote accordingly.
> >
> > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client..
> >
> > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
> >
> > The files can be grabbed
> > from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> >
> > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Posted by Krzysztof <h4...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> resolved.
> >
> > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> > check it and vote accordingly.
> >
> > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client..
> >
> > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget.
> >
> > The files can be grabbed
> > from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> >
> > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>