You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@corinthia.apache.org by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org> on 2015/08/18 23:04:49 UTC
[DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
23 August is Sunday, not Monday. It might not matter, but a simple solution is to simply keep the [VOTE] open until Monday, 24 August 2015.
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: jan i [mailto:jani@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:06
To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
Hi.
We have found some errors during the PRE-VOTE phase, which made that period
very
valuable instead of jumping direct to a VOTE.
This is the call for the official VOTE for incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip
and the signature:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc
The vote we will follow the standard guidelines:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
"Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
<http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval> -- i.e.,
at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there
must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed."
VOTE runs until Monday 23th August, where the IPMC VOTE will start.
I invite our mentors to vote, since their vote count as IPMC.
All IPMC who vote, please write if you do NOT want your vote to be
transferred to the IPMC vote.
rgds
jan i
Vote:
[ ] +1, I agree in releasing the artifacts
[ ] +0, I do not care if we release the artifacts
[ ] -1, I do not want the artifacts to be release because ....
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.
HI
just to be very clear I wrote 23th august, and that is the official end
date. It was a mistake that I called it monday, but I do not see any need
to change the end date. If you want to hang your hat on the very non
precise word monday than why not assume I thought about 31th August.
With 23th August the vote has been open for more than 72 hours + 48 hours
extra for the weekend.
rgds
jan i
On 19 August 2015 at 17:47, Dennis E. Hamilton <de...@acm.org>
wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Also, I did not attach my remark to a condition on a [VOTE], the use of
> [DISCUSS] was also meant to speak along-side the [VOTE] and not misuse the
> [VOTE] thread.
>
> You're not the only one who can be impatient here [;<).
>
> - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Kelly [mailto:pmkelly@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 02:29
> To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
>
> > On 19 Aug 2015, at 12:55 pm, Peter Kelly <pm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 19 Aug 2015, at 4:04 am, Dennis E. Hamilton <de...@acm.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> 23 August is Sunday, not Monday. It might not matter, but a simple
> solution is to simply keep the [VOTE] open until Monday, 24 August 2015.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I think following (what I assume to be) the standard 72-hour period is
> what we should follow.
>
> My apologies - I didn’t realise Jan had explicitly said Monday in the vote
> email. In that context your suggestion makes sense.
>
> I’ll try to avoid further such rants in the future :)
>
> —
> Dr Peter M. Kelly
> pmkelly@apache.org
>
> PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
>
>
>
RE: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
Posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org>.
Thank you.
Also, I did not attach my remark to a condition on a [VOTE], the use of [DISCUSS] was also meant to speak along-side the [VOTE] and not misuse the [VOTE] thread.
You're not the only one who can be impatient here [;<).
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kelly [mailto:pmkelly@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 02:29
To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
> On 19 Aug 2015, at 12:55 pm, Peter Kelly <pm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 19 Aug 2015, at 4:04 am, Dennis E. Hamilton <de...@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> 23 August is Sunday, not Monday. It might not matter, but a simple solution is to simply keep the [VOTE] open until Monday, 24 August 2015.
>
> ...
>
> I think following (what I assume to be) the standard 72-hour period is what we should follow.
My apologies - I didn’t realise Jan had explicitly said Monday in the vote email. In that context your suggestion makes sense.
I’ll try to avoid further such rants in the future :)
—
Dr Peter M. Kelly
pmkelly@apache.org
PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
(fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
Posted by Peter Kelly <pm...@apache.org>.
> On 19 Aug 2015, at 12:55 pm, Peter Kelly <pm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 19 Aug 2015, at 4:04 am, Dennis E. Hamilton <de...@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> 23 August is Sunday, not Monday. It might not matter, but a simple solution is to simply keep the [VOTE] open until Monday, 24 August 2015.
>
> ...
>
> I think following (what I assume to be) the standard 72-hour period is what we should follow.
My apologies - I didn’t realise Jan had explicitly said Monday in the vote email. In that context your suggestion makes sense.
I’ll try to avoid further such rants in the future :)
—
Dr Peter M. Kelly
pmkelly@apache.org
PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
(fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
Posted by Peter Kelly <pm...@apache.org>.
> On 19 Aug 2015, at 4:04 am, Dennis E. Hamilton <de...@acm.org> wrote:
>
> 23 August is Sunday, not Monday. It might not matter, but a simple solution is to simply keep the [VOTE] open until Monday, 24 August 2015.
I’m almost tempted not to reply to this, because I’m honestly getting *really* sick of all this nitpicking about procedures every time we have a vote instead of focusing on the substance of what’s being voted on. But I’ll bite...
I don’t understand this thing about weekends. I get it that some people may only spend Monday-Friday working, and want to have three full “business” days available to consider their vote. That makes sense if they’re doing votes as part of their regular 9-5 job.
But one could also make the argument that people working on open source projects outside of their day job only have the weekend available to do so in any significant. That would suggest the inverse, ensuring that votes always cross weekends, because such people are too busy with their day jobs during the week to participate in votes. All of us are in different situations regarding our schedules.
I think following (what I assume to be) the standard 72-hour period is what we should follow.
—
Dr Peter M. Kelly
pmkelly@apache.org
PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
(fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)