You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/23 15:43:00 UTC
[GitHub] [hadoop] ayushtkn edited a comment on pull request #3538: HDFS-16266. Add remote port information to HDFS audit log
ayushtkn edited a comment on pull request #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3538#issuecomment-949246786
I haven't gone through the entire discussion/code. Just that whether we should modify the existing field or add a new one. Technically both are correct and I don't see any serious issue with either(not thinking too deep). But I feel for the parsers to adapt, if there was a new field, it might be little bit more easy, Rather than trying to figure out whether the existing field has a port or not. Just my thoughts, I am Ok with whichever way most people tend to agree.
Anyway whatever we do should be optional & guarded by a config.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org