You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Yury Gerzhedovich (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/10/17 14:58:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-17820) Ignite 3. SQL. Add native support for SEARCH/SARG operator
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17618946#comment-17618946 ]
Yury Gerzhedovich commented on IGNITE-17820:
--------------------------------------------
[~amashenkov] , LGTM
> Ignite 3. SQL. Add native support for SEARCH/SARG operator
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-17820
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17820
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: sql
> Reporter: Andrey Mashenkov
> Assignee: Andrey Mashenkov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: calcite, ignite-3
> Fix For: 3.0.0-beta1
>
>
> Currently, Calcite compose some field conditions to {{SEARCH/SARG}} operator (for example: {{field IN (scalar)}}, {{field <> ...}}, {{field = value1 OR field = value2}}, etc). This operator is not supported natively by Ignite Calcite engine and converted back to original expression using {{RexUtil.expandSearch}} method on theĀ {{RexToLixTranslator}} phase.
> Such behavior forces Ignite to use full table scan instead of indexes in some cases. For example, if {{field}} is indexed, with {{field IN (1, 2)}} condition usually is much faster to scan index for 2 values, then full scan table and filter out results. For {{OR}} operator {{OrToUnion}} rule can't be applied and there will be full table scan again.
> We should support index traversing using SEARCH/SARG operator.
> Alternatively we can convert {{SEARCH/SARG}} to {{UNIONs}} (similarly to {{OrToUnion}} rule), but this approach will extend plan search space a lot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)