You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by amit2103 <am...@nrifintech.com> on 2015/05/08 06:28:12 UTC
Camel Resequencer and JMs transactions
Hi,
My scenario is that I have 1 jms queue, from which I read with concurrent
consumeres, use resequencer and a message header to arrange the messages
and then send them to another queue.
Our route is transacted. Now does the sending part happen in a transaction.
It seems to me that although the processor is transacted, when resequncer is
applied, the sending part is not transacted. As a result for a very short
period of time, the messages are in memory yet not send to the other queue.
is my assumption correct, is there any way to make the whole process
transacted.
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Resequencer-and-JMs-transactions-tp5766843.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Camel Resequencer and JMs transactions
Posted by amit2103 <am...@nrifintech.com>.
Many thanks for the answer, Claus.
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Resequencer-and-JMs-transactions-tp5766843p5766917.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Camel Resequencer and JMs transactions
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Yes the resequencer is memory based, and it is NOT possible to make it
part of a transaction.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:28 AM, amit2103 <am...@nrifintech.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My scenario is that I have 1 jms queue, from which I read with concurrent
> consumeres, use resequencer and a message header to arrange the messages
> and then send them to another queue.
>
> Our route is transacted. Now does the sending part happen in a transaction.
> It seems to me that although the processor is transacted, when resequncer is
> applied, the sending part is not transacted. As a result for a very short
> period of time, the messages are in memory yet not send to the other queue.
>
> is my assumption correct, is there any way to make the whole process
> transacted.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Resequencer-and-JMs-transactions-tp5766843.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/