You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by Anshum <an...@gmail.com> on 2009/08/13 06:43:02 UTC
Lucene Vs Sphinx benchmarking for large dataset
I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with a
little modified version of sphinx :)
Have posted my results here
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while!
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri Labs!
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
distinction is yours to draw............
Re: Lucene Vs Sphinx benchmarking for large dataset
Posted by Anshum <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Simon! :)
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri Labs!
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
distinction is yours to draw............
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Anshum<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey Simon,
> > Thanks for the comment, though would be great to have the comment @ the
> > blog! :)
> done!
>
> Simon
> > About testing vanilla sphinx Vs Sphinx, have that pipelined but would be
> > some time before I go ahead and do that.
> > I'm also planning a benchmarking (of search & indexing) of 2.4 & 2.9
> (when
> > its here) with the most recent version of sphinx (and other search
> engines).
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > Naukri Labs!
> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >
> > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> > distinction is yours to draw............
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Simon Willnauer <
> > simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Anshum, thanks for posting this on the list. I have a view comments on
> >> that benchmark while being happy that lucene has an upper hand in
> >> yours.
> >> I wonder if you can publish the various modifications you did to
> >> either of those? If not would it be possible to run the benchmarks
> >> against the vanilla versions? Did you use an already released version
> >> of lucene or did you do modifications against the trunk? I found it
> >> little hard to read - putting it into a table would make little more
> >> sense to me though. I personally would be interested in what kind of
> >> analysis you have applied to the index document and the queries
> >> though.
> >>
> >> simon
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Anshum<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with
> a
> >> > little modified version of sphinx :)
> >> > Have posted my results here
> >> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >> > Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Anshum Gupta
> >> > Naukri Labs!
> >> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >> >
> >> > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> >> > distinction is yours to draw............
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Lucene Vs Sphinx benchmarking for large dataset
Posted by Simon Willnauer <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Anshum<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Simon,
> Thanks for the comment, though would be great to have the comment @ the
> blog! :)
done!
Simon
> About testing vanilla sphinx Vs Sphinx, have that pipelined but would be
> some time before I go ahead and do that.
> I'm also planning a benchmarking (of search & indexing) of 2.4 & 2.9 (when
> its here) with the most recent version of sphinx (and other search engines).
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> Naukri Labs!
> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>
> The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> distinction is yours to draw............
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Simon Willnauer <
> simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Anshum, thanks for posting this on the list. I have a view comments on
>> that benchmark while being happy that lucene has an upper hand in
>> yours.
>> I wonder if you can publish the various modifications you did to
>> either of those? If not would it be possible to run the benchmarks
>> against the vanilla versions? Did you use an already released version
>> of lucene or did you do modifications against the trunk? I found it
>> little hard to read - putting it into a table would make little more
>> sense to me though. I personally would be interested in what kind of
>> analysis you have applied to the index document and the queries
>> though.
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Anshum<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with a
>> > little modified version of sphinx :)
>> > Have posted my results here
>> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>> > Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anshum Gupta
>> > Naukri Labs!
>> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>> >
>> > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
>> > distinction is yours to draw............
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene Vs Sphinx benchmarking for large dataset
Posted by Anshum <an...@gmail.com>.
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the comment, though would be great to have the comment @ the
blog! :)
About testing vanilla sphinx Vs Sphinx, have that pipelined but would be
some time before I go ahead and do that.
I'm also planning a benchmarking (of search & indexing) of 2.4 & 2.9 (when
its here) with the most recent version of sphinx (and other search engines).
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri Labs!
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
distinction is yours to draw............
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Anshum, thanks for posting this on the list. I have a view comments on
> that benchmark while being happy that lucene has an upper hand in
> yours.
> I wonder if you can publish the various modifications you did to
> either of those? If not would it be possible to run the benchmarks
> against the vanilla versions? Did you use an already released version
> of lucene or did you do modifications against the trunk? I found it
> little hard to read - putting it into a table would make little more
> sense to me though. I personally would be interested in what kind of
> analysis you have applied to the index document and the queries
> though.
>
> simon
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Anshum<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with a
> > little modified version of sphinx :)
> > Have posted my results here
> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> > Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while!
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > Naukri Labs!
> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >
> > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> > distinction is yours to draw............
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Lucene Vs Sphinx benchmarking for large dataset
Posted by Simon Willnauer <si...@googlemail.com>.
Anshum, thanks for posting this on the list. I have a view comments on
that benchmark while being happy that lucene has an upper hand in
yours.
I wonder if you can publish the various modifications you did to
either of those? If not would it be possible to run the benchmarks
against the vanilla versions? Did you use an already released version
of lucene or did you do modifications against the trunk? I found it
little hard to read - putting it into a table would make little more
sense to me though. I personally would be interested in what kind of
analysis you have applied to the index document and the queries
though.
simon
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Anshum<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with a
> little modified version of sphinx :)
> Have posted my results here
> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while!
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> Naukri Labs!
> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>
> The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> distinction is yours to draw............
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org