You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Chris Colman <ch...@stepaheadsoftware.com> on 2011/08/10 01:14:26 UTC

SAML and Wicket

Has anyone had any experience integrating SAML with Wicket?
 
Is it doable? Easy etc.,
 
Can it reuse wicket's inbuilt authentication/redirection mechanism?
 
Yours sincerely,
 
Chris Colman
 
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software

 
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
 
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278     Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120     
Email: chrisc@stepahead.com.au <ma...@stepahead.com.au> 
Website:
http://www.pagebloom.com <blocked::http://www.pagebloom.com/> 
http://develop.stepaheadsoftware.com
<blocked::http://develop.stepaheadsoftware.com/> 
 
 

RE: SAML and Wicket

Posted by Chris Colman <ch...@stepaheadsoftware.com>.
No problem. We don't use Spring but you're right, we might be able to
pick up some pointers from the code.

Thanks,
Chris

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Russell Pitre [mailto:rpitre@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 9:44 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SAML and Wicket
>
>How about wicket-auth-roles + spring security + spring security SAML
>extension.  The documentation looks sparse on the spring security SAML
>extension, but I bet you could figure it out. Perhaps there is some
sample
>code in the project source that you could take a look at.  Not exactly
the
>response you were asking for, but a response nonetheless.  Cheers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: SAML and Wicket

Posted by Russell Pitre <rp...@gmail.com>.
How about wicket-auth-roles + spring security + spring security SAML
extension.  The documentation looks sparse on the spring security SAML
extension, but I bet you could figure it out. Perhaps there is some sample
code in the project source that you could take a look at.  Not exactly the
response you were asking for, but a response nonetheless.  Cheers.