You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/11/29 13:40:55 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] zentol commented on pull request #21416: [FLINK-30202][tests] Do not assert on checkpointId

zentol commented on PR #21416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21416#issuecomment-1330669367

   > You're saying that we would introduce a test instability here if the RateLimitedStrategy wouldn't perform as expected?
   
   Yes. At least that was the idea. Now I'm not so sure anymore whether this makes sense. Given that the limit the count we invariably end up with `capacityPerCycle * numCycles` elements, regardless of whether rate-limiting was applied or not.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org