You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Peter N. Lundblad" <pe...@famlundblad.se> on 2004/07/25 19:44:27 UTC
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 brane@xbc.nu wrote:
> PASS: update apr-0.9
> PASS: update apr-util-0.9
> PASS: update apache-2.0
> PASS: update subversion
> PASS: autogen.sh
> BUILD: apr-0.9
> PASS: apr-0.9::check rebuild status
> BUILD: apr-util-0.9
> PASS: apr-util-0.9::check rebuild status
> BUILD: apache-2.0
> PASS: apache-2.0::check rebuild status
>
> BUILD: 1.1.x r10409 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared
>
> PASS: check build type
> rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-6/db/transactions: Directory not empty
> rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-6/db: Directory not empty
> rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-6: Directory not empty
> rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-7/db/transactions: Directory not empty
...
Anyone who knows what's causing these failures? I've seen them quite often
the last month or so.
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:00 AM +0200 "Branko ?ibej"
> <br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
>
>> It truly is FreeBSD 5.0, but this only started happening a short
>> while ago.
>> I don't suppose FreeBSD has timed failure built in? .-)
>
>
> I wouldn't trust FreeBSD 5.0 very much. This seems like a ufs bug -
> which was completely rewritten in the 5.x series (with ufs2) - 5.0 was
> the first release to include it - I know they had some bugs in the ufs
> layer that were subsequently fixed. Very possible that this is one of
> them.
>
> Yes, it could be hardware, but my initial guess is an OS bug. -- justin
I ran fsck manually on that volume and it found a bunch of orphaned
files and dirs, all of them from the test runs. I suspect those could be
the result of recent power outages due to thunderstorms (three times in
two days this week alone, several more times in the last month -- yuck).
We'll see what happens; first complete run already succeeded, so it
looks good. I did download the 5.2.1 install CD and will probably
upgrade in due time, if the problems persist. I'll definitely not buy a
UPS for that cruddy box. :-)
Note that none of this affected by firewall box (Debian with Reiserfs),
or the Linux test box (Debian with XFS on S/W RAID 0), or my working box
(WinXP with NTFS on H/W RAID 5, hehe, so it's really no contest). :-)
(No, I don't have all of those under my desk, the Linux test box is
somewhere else)
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:00 AM +0200 "Branko ?ibej" <br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
> It truly is FreeBSD 5.0, but this only started happening a short while ago.
> I don't suppose FreeBSD has timed failure built in? .-)
I wouldn't trust FreeBSD 5.0 very much. This seems like a ufs bug - which was
completely rewritten in the 5.x series (with ufs2) - 5.0 was the first release
to include it - I know they had some bugs in the ufs layer that were
subsequently fixed. Very possible that this is one of them.
Yes, it could be hardware, but my initial guess is an OS bug. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Monday, July 26, 2004 9:59 AM +0200 "Branko ?ibej" <br...@xbc.nu>
> wrote:
>
>>>> BUILD: 1.1.x r10409 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared
>>>
>>>
>> I suspect my disk is slowly breaking down. Those directories _are_
>> empty,
>> but it takes a reboot before I can delete them.
>>
>> If anyone familiar with FreeBSD could give me a hint about how to fix
>> this...
>
>
> If it truly is FreeBSD 5.0, I'd suggest upgrading to at least FreeBSD
> 5.2, which has proven fairly stable for me. -- justin
It truly is FreeBSD 5.0, but this only started happening a short while
ago. I don't suppose FreeBSD has timed failure built in? .-)
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
Posted by "Bruce A. Mah" <bm...@acm.org>.
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Monday, July 26, 2004 9:59 AM +0200 "Branko ?ibej" <br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
>
> >>> BUILD: 1.1.x r10409 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared
> >>
> > I suspect my disk is slowly breaking down. Those directories _are_ empty,
> > but it takes a reboot before I can delete them.
> >
> > If anyone familiar with FreeBSD could give me a hint about how to fix this...
>
> If it truly is FreeBSD 5.0, I'd suggest upgrading to at least FreeBSD 5.2,
> which has proven fairly stable for me.
Or 5.2.1-RELEASE, even, which is a bugfix release for 5.2-RELEASE.
Bruce.
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Monday, July 26, 2004 9:59 AM +0200 "Branko ?ibej" <br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
>>> BUILD: 1.1.x r10409 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared
>>
> I suspect my disk is slowly breaking down. Those directories _are_ empty,
> but it takes a reboot before I can delete them.
>
> If anyone familiar with FreeBSD could give me a hint about how to fix this...
If it truly is FreeBSD 5.0, I'd suggest upgrading to at least FreeBSD 5.2,
which has proven fairly stable for me. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.x r10409: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 brane@xbc.nu wrote:
>
>
>
>>PASS: update apr-0.9
>>PASS: update apr-util-0.9
>>PASS: update apache-2.0
>>PASS: update subversion
>>PASS: autogen.sh
>>BUILD: apr-0.9
>>PASS: apr-0.9::check rebuild status
>>BUILD: apr-util-0.9
>>PASS: apr-util-0.9::check rebuild status
>>BUILD: apache-2.0
>>PASS: apache-2.0::check rebuild status
>>
>>BUILD: 1.1.x r10409 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared
>>
>>PASS: check build type
>>rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-6/db/transactions: Directory not empty
>>rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-6/db: Directory not empty
>>rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-6: Directory not empty
>>rm: /home/brane/svn/obj-sh/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/repositories/switch_tests-7/db/transactions: Directory not empty
>>
>>
>...
>
>Anyone who knows what's causing these failures? I've seen them quite often
>the last month or so.
>
>
I suspect my disk is slowly breaking down. Those directories _are_
empty, but it takes a reboot before I can delete them.
If anyone familiar with FreeBSD could give me a hint about how to fix
this...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org