You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com> on 2012/02/06 13:16:20 UTC

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Hi Dan,
I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
the merged schemas.
Let me know if you see some issues.

thanks.
regards, aki

2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
> Blueprint http
> --------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-4084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Transports
>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>            Reporter: Tony Su
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>
>
> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are still additional schemas that need porting.
>
> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and typeconverters
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:55:00 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> 2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
> > to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the
> > http transport, I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking
> > people might want a very spring similar approach in http and httpj:?
> 
> I haven't followed up on that change. I think the locally encapsulated
> configuration is practical in some uses cases.

Agreed.

> In contrast, the
> central configuration thing is a very useful thing when considering
> the management of the sensitive information. 

The design I went with has it configuring the conduit based on the "global" 
stuff first, then deferring down into the normal Bus configuration.   Thus, if 
you have local configuration present, it can override anything you have set 
globally.     The main gap right now is that you can only provide local 
configuration through Spring, not blueprint.     Working on that would be a 
huge help.  

> In that direction, I
> thought that we could also eventually use the apache HTTPClient (if we
> could use it for the http conduit) and refer to it from the conduit?

The is perpetually on my "todo" list.  :-(    The branch with that work is now 
horribly out of date.   I'm not sure how much on that branch is even still 
usable.  I worked on that during the middle of the 2.3.x development so it's 
closer to the 2.2 API's.   There's been a lot of cleanup and refactoring so 
I'm not sure what is involved in grabbing that code again.

Dan


> In that case, we could reuse the http configurations in other
> components. Dan once talked about using the apache http client. I
> wanted to look into the current status of this work.
> 
> regards aki

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Johan, Dan,

I just added the HTTPConduit part in trunk. Not everything is in yet, though.

regards, aki

2012/2/7 Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com>:
> 2012/2/7 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
>> Heh :)
>>
>> Not 100% sure we said the same thing here.
>> I'm gone for about the next 4 days, I might start if, if you want to, please go ahead.
>> The customer I was out with that put the ticket in was basically looking for jetty + ssl config.
>
> Hi Johan,
> I was confused with your remark but saw a lot of energy coming out of
> it. And I thought you would be finishing it up by the weekend. I, on
> the other hand, was thinking about working on it so that it can make
> into 2.5.3 sometime.
>
> I will look into the http client side and get back to you.
>
> Regards, aki
>
>>
>> The client side stuff would not necessarily have to interfere with that, the osgi servlet, now that is
>> a potential different discussion, what is the right handling of SSL on that side?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
>>>> I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd be able to
>>>> consolidate some of the parts there.
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet lag for a day or so.
>>>> I'll be available for testing and some banging on it at the very least friday eve til monday morn,
>>>> I suspect in-between as well.
>>>
>>> Okay. I will leave it to you then.  I just noticed that the actual
>>> http-conf schema definition does not have spring dependency (i.e., not
>>> using beans:identifierTypes etc). So, we don't need to modify the
>>> schema and my earlier comment is invalid.  I was looking at the wrong
>>> http-conf.xsd earlier and had the wrong assumption.
>>>
>>>> to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the http transport,
>>>> I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking people might want a very spring similar
>>>> approach in http and httpj:?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't followed up on that change. I think the locally encapsulated
>>> configuration is practical in some uses cases. In contrast, the
>>> central configuration thing is a very useful thing when considering
>>> the management of the sensitive information. In that direction, I
>>> thought that we could also eventually use the apache HTTPClient (if we
>>> could use it for the http conduit) and refer to it from the conduit?
>>> In that case, we could reuse the http configurations in other
>>> components. Dan once talked about using the apache http client. I
>>> wanted to look into the current status of this work.
>>>
>>> regards aki
>>>
>>>
>>>> /je
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Johan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
>>>>> let me know whether I can help here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, aki
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>>>>>> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>>>>>>> the merged schemas.
>>>>>>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
>>>>>> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>> regards, aki
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>> Blueprint http
>>>>>>>> --------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 Key: CXF-4084
>>>>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>>>>>>>>             Project: CXF
>>>>>>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>>>>>>          Components: Transports
>>>>>>>>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>>>>>>>>            Reporter: Tony Su
>>>>>>>>            Priority: Minor
>>>>>>>>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>>>>>>>> still additional schemas that need porting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>>>>>>>> typeconverters
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>>>>>> administrators:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>>>>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com>.
2012/2/7 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
> Heh :)
>
> Not 100% sure we said the same thing here.
> I'm gone for about the next 4 days, I might start if, if you want to, please go ahead.
> The customer I was out with that put the ticket in was basically looking for jetty + ssl config.

Hi Johan,
I was confused with your remark but saw a lot of energy coming out of
it. And I thought you would be finishing it up by the weekend. I, on
the other hand, was thinking about working on it so that it can make
into 2.5.3 sometime.

I will look into the http client side and get back to you.

Regards, aki

>
> The client side stuff would not necessarily have to interfere with that, the osgi servlet, now that is
> a potential different discussion, what is the right handling of SSL on that side?
>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>
>> 2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
>>> I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd be able to
>>> consolidate some of the parts there.
>>>
>>> I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet lag for a day or so.
>>> I'll be available for testing and some banging on it at the very least friday eve til monday morn,
>>> I suspect in-between as well.
>>
>> Okay. I will leave it to you then.  I just noticed that the actual
>> http-conf schema definition does not have spring dependency (i.e., not
>> using beans:identifierTypes etc). So, we don't need to modify the
>> schema and my earlier comment is invalid.  I was looking at the wrong
>> http-conf.xsd earlier and had the wrong assumption.
>>
>>> to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the http transport,
>>> I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking people might want a very spring similar
>>> approach in http and httpj:?
>>>
>>
>> I haven't followed up on that change. I think the locally encapsulated
>> configuration is practical in some uses cases. In contrast, the
>> central configuration thing is a very useful thing when considering
>> the management of the sensitive information. In that direction, I
>> thought that we could also eventually use the apache HTTPClient (if we
>> could use it for the http conduit) and refer to it from the conduit?
>> In that case, we could reuse the http configurations in other
>> components. Dan once talked about using the apache http client. I
>> wanted to look into the current status of this work.
>>
>> regards aki
>>
>>
>>> /je
>>>
>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Johan,
>>>>
>>>> Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
>>>> let me know whether I can help here.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, aki
>>>>
>>>> 2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>>>>> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>>>>>> the merged schemas.
>>>>>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
>>>>> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>> regards, aki
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>> Blueprint http
>>>>>>> --------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                 Key: CXF-4084
>>>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>>>>>>>             Project: CXF
>>>>>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>>>>>          Components: Transports
>>>>>>>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>>>>>>>            Reporter: Tony Su
>>>>>>>            Priority: Minor
>>>>>>>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>>>>>>> still additional schemas that need porting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>>>>>>> typeconverters
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>>>>> administrators:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>>>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>
>

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
Heh :) 

Not 100% sure we said the same thing here.
I'm gone for about the next 4 days, I might start if, if you want to, please go ahead.
The customer I was out with that put the ticket in was basically looking for jetty + ssl config.

The client side stuff would not necessarily have to interfere with that, the osgi servlet, now that is 
a potential different discussion, what is the right handling of SSL on that side?


On Feb 6, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:

> 2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
>> I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd be able to
>> consolidate some of the parts there.
>> 
>> I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet lag for a day or so.
>> I'll be available for testing and some banging on it at the very least friday eve til monday morn,
>> I suspect in-between as well.
> 
> Okay. I will leave it to you then.  I just noticed that the actual
> http-conf schema definition does not have spring dependency (i.e., not
> using beans:identifierTypes etc). So, we don't need to modify the
> schema and my earlier comment is invalid.  I was looking at the wrong
> http-conf.xsd earlier and had the wrong assumption.
> 
>> to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the http transport,
>> I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking people might want a very spring similar
>> approach in http and httpj:?
>> 
> 
> I haven't followed up on that change. I think the locally encapsulated
> configuration is practical in some uses cases. In contrast, the
> central configuration thing is a very useful thing when considering
> the management of the sensitive information. In that direction, I
> thought that we could also eventually use the apache HTTPClient (if we
> could use it for the http conduit) and refer to it from the conduit?
> In that case, we could reuse the http configurations in other
> components. Dan once talked about using the apache http client. I
> wanted to look into the current status of this work.
> 
> regards aki
> 
> 
>> /je
>> 
>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Johan,
>>> 
>>> Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
>>> let me know whether I can help here.
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Regards, aki
>>> 
>>> 2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>>>> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>>>>> the merged schemas.
>>>>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>>>> 
>>>> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
>>>> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>>>> 
>>>> Dan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks.
>>>>> regards, aki
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>>>>>> Blueprint http
>>>>>> --------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>                 Key: CXF-4084
>>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>>>>>>             Project: CXF
>>>>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>>>>          Components: Transports
>>>>>>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>>>>>>            Reporter: Tony Su
>>>>>>            Priority: Minor
>>>>>>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>>>>>> still additional schemas that need porting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>>>>>> typeconverters
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>>>> administrators:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> 


Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com>.
2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>:
> I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd be able to
> consolidate some of the parts there.
>
> I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet lag for a day or so.
> I'll be available for testing and some banging on it at the very least friday eve til monday morn,
> I suspect in-between as well.

Okay. I will leave it to you then.  I just noticed that the actual
http-conf schema definition does not have spring dependency (i.e., not
using beans:identifierTypes etc). So, we don't need to modify the
schema and my earlier comment is invalid.  I was looking at the wrong
http-conf.xsd earlier and had the wrong assumption.

> to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the http transport,
> I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking people might want a very spring similar
> approach in http and httpj:?
>

I haven't followed up on that change. I think the locally encapsulated
configuration is practical in some uses cases. In contrast, the
central configuration thing is a very useful thing when considering
the management of the sensitive information. In that direction, I
thought that we could also eventually use the apache HTTPClient (if we
could use it for the http conduit) and refer to it from the conduit?
In that case, we could reuse the http configurations in other
components. Dan once talked about using the apache http client. I
wanted to look into the current status of this work.

regards aki


> /je
>
> On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
>> let me know whether I can help here.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards, aki
>>
>> 2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>>> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>>>> the merged schemas.
>>>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>>>
>>> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
>>> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks.
>>>> regards, aki
>>>>
>>>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>>>>> Blueprint http
>>>>> --------------
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Key: CXF-4084
>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>>>>>             Project: CXF
>>>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>>>          Components: Transports
>>>>>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>>>>>            Reporter: Tony Su
>>>>>            Priority: Minor
>>>>>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>>>>> still additional schemas that need porting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>>>>> typeconverters
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>>> administrators:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd be able to 
consolidate some of the parts there.

I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet lag for a day or so.
I'll be available for testing and some banging on it at the very least friday eve til monday morn, 
I suspect in-between as well.

to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the http transport,
I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking people might want a very spring similar
approach in http and httpj:?

/je

On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:

> Hi Johan,
> 
> Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
> let me know whether I can help here.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards, aki
> 
> 2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>> Hi Dan,
>>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>>> the merged schemas.
>>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>> 
>> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
>> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> thanks.
>>> regards, aki
>>> 
>>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>>>> Blueprint http
>>>> --------------
>>>> 
>>>>                 Key: CXF-4084
>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>>>>             Project: CXF
>>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>>          Components: Transports
>>>>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>>>>            Reporter: Tony Su
>>>>            Priority: Minor
>>>>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>>>> still additional schemas that need porting.
>>>> 
>>>> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>>>> typeconverters
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>> administrators:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Johan,

Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
let me know whether I can help here.

Thanks.

Regards, aki

2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>> the merged schemas.
>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>
> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> thanks.
>> regards, aki
>>
>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>> > Blueprint http
>> > --------------
>> >
>> >                 Key: CXF-4084
>> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>> >             Project: CXF
>> >          Issue Type: New Feature
>> >          Components: Transports
>> >    Affects Versions: 2.5
>> >            Reporter: Tony Su
>> >            Priority: Minor
>> >             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>> >
>> >
>> > Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>> > still additional schemas that need porting.
>> >
>> > Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>> > typeconverters
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> > administrators:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>> > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [jira] [Created] (CXF-4084) Blueprint http

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
> the merged schemas.
> Let me know if you see some issues.

Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started 
looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.

Dan



> 
> thanks.
> regards, aki
> 
> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
> > Blueprint http
> > --------------
> > 
> >                 Key: CXF-4084
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
> >             Project: CXF
> >          Issue Type: New Feature
> >          Components: Transports
> >    Affects Versions: 2.5
> >            Reporter: Tony Su
> >            Priority: Minor
> >             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
> > 
> > 
> > Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
> > still additional schemas that need porting.
> > 
> > Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
> > typeconverters
> > 
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> > administrators:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com