You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2010/05/13 18:59:50 UTC
[servicemix-cxf-bc] any reason why the consumer is synchronous by
default ?
I just found that, i guess we should switch the default value to
asynchronous to not block threads for nothing...
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [servicemix-cxf-bc] any reason why the consumer is synchronous by
default ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, I think it would make sense to change the default at some point.
Especially as most users would not even be affected by this change I think.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 03:34, Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> As asynchronous cxf bc consumer which leverage cxf continuation is new
> feature after synchronous, so for backward compatibility, I just keep
> synchronous as default value.
>
> I guess we can change to use asynchronous by default, create
> SMXCOMP-745[1] to track it.
>
> [1]https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMXCOMP-745
>
> Freeman
>
> On 2010-5-14, at 上午12:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I just found that, i guess we should switch the default value to
>> asynchronous to not block threads for nothing...
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Freeman Fang
>
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [servicemix-cxf-bc] any reason why the consumer is synchronous by default ?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Guillaume,
As asynchronous cxf bc consumer which leverage cxf continuation is new
feature after synchronous, so for backward compatibility, I just keep
synchronous as default value.
I guess we can change to use asynchronous by default, create
SMXCOMP-745[1] to track it.
[1]https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMXCOMP-745
Freeman
On 2010-5-14, at 上午12:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I just found that, i guess we should switch the default value to
> asynchronous to not block threads for nothing...
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
--
Freeman Fang
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com