You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Milind Bhandarkar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/01/26 22:11:49 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-674) Hadoop records should provide
comvenient APIs for serialization/deserialization
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467919 ]
Milind Bhandarkar commented on HADOOP-674:
------------------------------------------
One can easily use ByteArrayOutputStream to serialize and deserialize out of current generated code. Addition of above API's will unnecessarily increase complexity of generated code. Is there any strong reason to believe that the above API will be a common case for usage ? In light of HADOOP-941, this API will increase Hadoop Record I/O's dependence on Hadoop.
> Hadoop records should provide comvenient APIs for serialization/deserialization
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-674
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: record
> Reporter: Runping Qi
> Assigned To: Milind Bhandarkar
>
> I found the following APIs are very convenient to use and should be part of the generated class from Jute IDL :
> public BytesWritable serialize(String format);
> public void deserialize(BytesWitable data, String format);
> public static MyRecordJT deserialize(BytesWitable data, String format);
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.