You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Andrew Humphries (MEL)" <An...@foxtel.com.au> on 2013/05/07 05:39:19 UTC
Issue with PNG images in FOP 1.0 / 1.1 and XML Graphics 1.5 in
Glassfish 3.0.1
Dear User group,
I have recently upgraded to Glassfish 3.0.1 from GF 2.0.
I am having an issue whereby PNG images are causing the rendering of PDFs to go very slowly in Glassfish 3.0.1 on Win XP (not tried on Solaris yet)
The issue is the same with FOP 1.0 / 1.1 - what is impacting the speed is changing from XML Graphics 1.4 to 1.5
In GF 3.0.1 with fop 1.0 and xmlGraf 1.4 my pdf renders in approx 60-65 secs !
In GF 3.0.1 with fop 1.0 and xmlGraf 1.5 my pdf renders in approx 14-17 secs !
Bear in mind that In GF 2.0 with fop 1.0 and xmlGraf 1.4 my pdf renders in approx 5 secs == nice
I have used Visual VM sampler to see that the methods that are taking the majority of the time are :
In xmlGraf 1.4 - org.apache.xmlgraphics.ps.ImageEncodingHelper.encodeRenderedImageAsRGB() - consuming 58 out of the 63 seconds taken to render
In xmlGraf 1.5 - org.apache.xmlgraphics.ps.ImageEncodingHelper.optimizedWriteTo() - consuming 14 out of the 17 seconds taken to render
When I remove the pngs from the folder where they are expected by FOP the PDF renders at normal speed - in about 5 seconds or so
I am trying to get our designer to recreate the pngs as Jpegs as they are rendering at normal speed in the new GF, but the scaling is all wrong and it's going to take time to play with bit depth etc...
Would just like to stick with the PNGs
Any assistance would be appreciated. Thanks
Regards,
Andrew Humphries
Analyst Programmer
T +61 (3) 8325 2047
Foxtel | 1-21 Dean Street, Moonee Ponds VIC 3039 | foxtel.com.au<http://www.foxtel.com.au/>
[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\sutionoa\Desktop\image001.jpg]<http://www.foxtel.com.au/>
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify the sender immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not be the views of FOXTEL, unless specifically stated. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment (s) are free from computer viruses or other defects.
Re: Issue with PNG images in FOP 1.0 / 1.1 and XML Graphics 1.5 in
Glassfish 3.0.1
Posted by Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>.
This issue has been discussed before. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XGC-55 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XGC-53 for some brackground. You may
want to try a different image loader, see
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/ImageLoaderRawPNG.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Andrew Humphries (MEL) <
Andrew.Humphries@foxtel.com.au> wrote:
> Dear User group,****
>
> ** **
>
> I have recently upgraded to Glassfish 3.0.1 from GF 2.0.****
>
> ** **
>
> I am having an issue whereby PNG images are causing the rendering of PDFs
> to go very slowly in Glassfish 3.0.1 on Win XP (not tried on Solaris yet)*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> The issue is the same with FOP 1.0 / 1.1 - what is impacting the speed is
> changing from XML Graphics 1.4 to 1.5****
>
> ** **
>
> In GF 3.0.1 with fop 1.0 and xmlGraf 1.4 my pdf renders in approx 60-65
> secs !****
>
> In GF 3.0.1 with fop 1.0 and xmlGraf 1.5 my pdf renders in approx 14-17
> secs !****
>
> ** **
>
> Bear in mind that In GF 2.0 with fop 1.0 and xmlGraf 1.4 my pdf renders in
> approx 5 secs == nice****
>
> ** **
>
> I have used Visual VM sampler to see that the methods that are taking the
> majority of the time are : ****
>
> In xmlGraf 1.4 -
> org.apache.xmlgraphics.ps.ImageEncodingHelper.encodeRenderedImageAsRGB() –
> consuming 58 out of the 63 seconds taken to render****
>
> In xmlGraf 1.5 -
> org.apache.xmlgraphics.ps.ImageEncodingHelper.optimizedWriteTo() –
> consuming 14 out of the 17 seconds taken to render****
>
> ** **
>
> When I remove the pngs from the folder where they are expected by FOP the
> PDF renders at normal speed – in about 5 seconds or so****
>
> ** **
>
> I am trying to get our designer to recreate the pngs as Jpegs as they are
> rendering at normal speed in the new GF, but the scaling is all wrong and
> it’s going to take time to play with bit depth etc…****
>
> ** **
>
> Would just like to stick with the PNGs ****
>
> ** **
>
> Any assistance would be appreciated. Thanks****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ****
>
> Andrew Humphries****
>
> Analyst Programmer****
>
> ****
>
> T +61 (3) 8325 2047 ****
>
> Foxtel | 1-21 Dean Street, Moonee Ponds VIC 3039 | foxtel.com.au<http://www.foxtel.com.au/>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
> C:\Users\sutionoa\Desktop\image001.jpg] <http://www.foxtel.com.au/>****
>
> ** **
> This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete it from your system, do not use or
> disclose the information in any way, and notify the sender immediately.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and
> may not be the views of FOXTEL, unless specifically stated. No warranty is
> made that the e-mail or attachment (s) are free from computer viruses or
> other defects.
>