[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14030) HBase Backup/Restore Phase 1

["Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15081617#comment-15081617 ] 

Vladimir Rodionov commented on HBASE-14030:
-------------------------------------------

[~mbertozzi]
{quote}
I just started looking at the code, but my first question is:
why are we using java Properties and Serializable Object instead of protobuf?
{quote}

Any reason why we should use protobuf? Java serialization is much simpler, performance is not the issue, these are system (not-public) objects.  

> HBase Backup/Restore Phase 1
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14030
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14030
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Umbrella
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Vladimir Rodionov
>            Assignee: Vladimir Rodionov
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-14030-v0.patch, HBASE-14030-v1.patch, HBASE-14030-v10.patch, HBASE-14030-v11.patch, HBASE-14030-v12.patch, HBASE-14030-v13.patch, HBASE-14030-v14.patch, HBASE-14030-v15.patch, HBASE-14030-v17.patch, HBASE-14030-v18.patch, HBASE-14030-v2.patch, HBASE-14030-v20.patch, HBASE-14030-v21.patch, HBASE-14030-v22.patch, HBASE-14030-v23.patch, HBASE-14030-v24.patch, HBASE-14030-v25.patch, HBASE-14030-v26.patch, HBASE-14030-v3.patch, HBASE-14030-v4.patch, HBASE-14030-v5.patch, HBASE-14030-v6.patch, HBASE-14030-v7.patch, HBASE-14030-v8.patch
>
>
> This is the umbrella ticket for Backup/Restore Phase 1. See HBASE-7912 design doc for the phase description.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)