You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> on 2010/10/19 17:43:11 UTC

Making emma stuff optional?

Hi,

can we make the emma stuff optional? Currently the file coverage.em is
created in the root of each module (which is not in svn:ignore atm - no
problem with that we can just add it) and an additional artifact -emma
is created, which we don't want to release/deploy.

So I think this should be turned off by default.

Regards
Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org

Re: Making emma stuff optional?

Posted by Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de>.

Thanks a lot Justin! It also fixes the problem I wrote about in the 
other mail. I can now run the launchpad again.

Best,

Sandro

Am 19.10.10 19:28, schrieb Justin Edelson:
> done in r1024330.
>
> Justin
>
> On 10/19/10 11:43 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> can we make the emma stuff optional? Currently the file coverage.em is
>> created in the root of each module (which is not in svn:ignore atm - no
>> problem with that we can just add it) and an additional artifact -emma
>> is created, which we don't want to release/deploy.
>>
>> So I think this should be turned off by default.
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>
>

Re: Making emma stuff optional?

Posted by Justin Edelson <ju...@gmail.com>.

done in r1024330.

Justin

On 10/19/10 11:43 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> can we make the emma stuff optional? Currently the file coverage.em is
> created in the root of each module (which is not in svn:ignore atm - no
> problem with that we can just add it) and an additional artifact -emma
> is created, which we don't want to release/deploy.
> 
> So I think this should be turned off by default.
> 
> Regards
> Carsten