Previous vote on Tomcat 5.0.11

[Richard Norman <ja...@hotmail.com>]

Previously in a mention of a vote for Tomcat 5.0.11 as being Beta or Alpha 
status, I vote beta.

I have not done major extensive testing, but in everything I hav run so far 
nothing has had a major hickup. The major issue I saw immediately, was the 
config of the appBase and docBase attributes in server.xml on windows.  I am 
still do ing more tests and checking, but it looks good so far.

Besides if 5.09 was beta, I think the fixes make this along the same lines.

Thanks,

Richard Norman
Web/Application Developer

_________________________________________________________________
Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon

Re: Previous vote on Tomcat 5.0.11

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

Richard Norman wrote:
> Previously in a mention of a vote for Tomcat 5.0.11 as being Beta or 
> Alpha status, I vote beta.
> 
> I have not done major extensive testing, but in everything I hav run so 
> far nothing has had a major hickup. The major issue I saw immediately, 
> was the config of the appBase and docBase attributes in server.xml on 
> windows.  I am still do ing more tests and checking, but it looks good 
> so far.
> 
> Besides if 5.09 was beta, I think the fixes make this along the same lines.

Apparently, there was a regression when the security manager is used, 
because of the move of the commons-logging binary. I'll have to investigate.
If I can reproduce it, I'll release a 5.0.12 with a few more fixes.

Remy