You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Rafael Weingärtner <ra...@gmail.com> on 2017/03/07 17:05:44 UTC

More Jira tickets clean up

Hi folks,
Today I had gone through another batch of old Jira tickets and we have a
bunch that can be closed again. The following are the ones I have gone
through. Before I close any ticket I would like to check them with you,
especially the ones from a category called “Seemed fixed, but I would like
to hear some feedback here”. I will be waiting for your feedback before I
proceed to close any ticket.

- Jira tickets that have PRs and were already merged, or at least a commit
hash code reference
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9509
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9634
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9540
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9635
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9598
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-350
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-535
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3054
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7633
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976

- Jira ticket linked to a PR that is linked to a series of Jira tickets
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9533 (was this solved?)

- Seemed fixed, but I would like to hear some feedback here
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-245
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-371
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-429
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-438
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-458
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-486
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-506
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-561
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-692
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-696
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1036
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1306
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5650
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5642
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4870 (naming
conventions on Marvin?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759 (thoughts here
Daan?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4523
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4365
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4232
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3896
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3477
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3012
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 (Mike Tutkowski,
is this still happenings? Is it possible for you to check?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 (Mike, any
thoughts here?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7379 (title=200MB limit
setting too low for network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate;
isn`t it a question for the operator/administrator to configure the default
value?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7167
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7142 (let's open
tickets for specific issues and not for a broad class; then, the management
(for us) becomes easier)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7067 (questions should
be directed to the mailing list)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7056 (questions should
be directed to the mailing list)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7048
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6849
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6848
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6643
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6642
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6641
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6640
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6639
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6638
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6637
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6567
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6484
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6059
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6033
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9028 (seems more like a
question that no one replied than a bug)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9003
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8807 (questions should
be directed to the mailing list)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8806 (questions should
be directed to the mailing list)

- Did not understand the ticket
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6074
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6057

-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
sorry Rafael, I haven't taken the time to look at more then a few. Go
ahead, for my part

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
<ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
> It has been a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these tickets.
>
> In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
> I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
> by the time; let’s not loose momentum. However, we still have some (a lot?)
> Jira tickets that seem to be left behind.
>
> In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
> something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).
>
> After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in some
> iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Good hard work again Rafael,
>>
>> I’ll try to find time today to browse through them.
>>
>> On 07/03/17 18:05, "Rafael Weingärtner" <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi folks,
>>     Today I had gone through another batch of old Jira tickets and we have
>> a
>>     bunch that can be closed again. The following are the ones I have gone
>>     through. Before I close any ticket I would like to check them with you,
>>     especially the ones from a category called “Seemed fixed, but I would
>> like
>>     to hear some feedback here”. I will be waiting for your feedback
>> before I
>>     proceed to close any ticket.
>>
>>     - Jira tickets that have PRs and were already merged, or at least a
>> commit
>>     hash code reference
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9509
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9634
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9540
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9635
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9598
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-350
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-535
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3054
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7633
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976
>>
>>     - Jira ticket linked to a PR that is linked to a series of Jira tickets
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9533 (was this
>> solved?)
>>
>>     - Seemed fixed, but I would like to hear some feedback here
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-245
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-371
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-429
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-438
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-458
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-486
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-506
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-561
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-692
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-696
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1036
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1306
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5650
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5642
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4870 (naming
>>     conventions on Marvin?)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759 (thoughts
>> here
>>     Daan?)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4523
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4365
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4232
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3896
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3477
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3012
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 (Mike
>> Tutkowski,
>>     is this still happenings? Is it possible for you to check?)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 (Mike, any
>>     thoughts here?)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7379 (title=200MB
>> limit
>>     setting too low for network.throttling.rate and
>> vm.network.throttling.rate;
>>     isn`t it a question for the operator/administrator to configure the
>> default
>>     value?)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7167
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7142 (let's open
>>     tickets for specific issues and not for a broad class; then, the
>> management
>>     (for us) becomes easier)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7067 (questions
>> should
>>     be directed to the mailing list)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7056 (questions
>> should
>>     be directed to the mailing list)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7048
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6849
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6848
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6643
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6642
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6641
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6640
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6639
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6638
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6637
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6567
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6484
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6059
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6033
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9028 (seems more
>> like a
>>     question that no one replied than a bug)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9003
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8807 (questions
>> should
>>     be directed to the mailing list)
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8806 (questions
>> should
>>     be directed to the mailing list)
>>
>>     - Did not understand the ticket
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6074
>>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6057
>>
>>     --
>>     Rafael Weingärtner
>>
>>
>>
>> daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner



-- 
Daan

Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Posted by Rafael Weingärtner <ra...@gmail.com>.
Folks,
It has been a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these tickets.

In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
by the time; let’s not loose momentum. However, we still have some (a lot?)
Jira tickets that seem to be left behind.

In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).

After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in some
iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Good hard work again Rafael,
>
> I’ll try to find time today to browse through them.
>
> On 07/03/17 18:05, "Rafael Weingärtner" <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi folks,
>     Today I had gone through another batch of old Jira tickets and we have
> a
>     bunch that can be closed again. The following are the ones I have gone
>     through. Before I close any ticket I would like to check them with you,
>     especially the ones from a category called “Seemed fixed, but I would
> like
>     to hear some feedback here”. I will be waiting for your feedback
> before I
>     proceed to close any ticket.
>
>     - Jira tickets that have PRs and were already merged, or at least a
> commit
>     hash code reference
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9509
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9634
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9540
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9635
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9598
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-350
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-535
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3054
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7633
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976
>
>     - Jira ticket linked to a PR that is linked to a series of Jira tickets
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9533 (was this
> solved?)
>
>     - Seemed fixed, but I would like to hear some feedback here
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-245
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-371
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-429
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-438
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-458
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-486
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-506
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-561
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-692
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-696
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1036
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1306
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5650
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5642
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4870 (naming
>     conventions on Marvin?)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759 (thoughts
> here
>     Daan?)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4523
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4365
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4232
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3896
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3477
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3012
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 (Mike
> Tutkowski,
>     is this still happenings? Is it possible for you to check?)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 (Mike, any
>     thoughts here?)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7379 (title=200MB
> limit
>     setting too low for network.throttling.rate and
> vm.network.throttling.rate;
>     isn`t it a question for the operator/administrator to configure the
> default
>     value?)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7167
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7142 (let's open
>     tickets for specific issues and not for a broad class; then, the
> management
>     (for us) becomes easier)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7067 (questions
> should
>     be directed to the mailing list)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7056 (questions
> should
>     be directed to the mailing list)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7048
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6849
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6848
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6643
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6642
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6641
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6640
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6639
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6638
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6637
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6567
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6484
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6059
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6033
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9028 (seems more
> like a
>     question that no one replied than a bug)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9003
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8807 (questions
> should
>     be directed to the mailing list)
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8806 (questions
> should
>     be directed to the mailing list)
>
>     - Did not understand the ticket
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6074
>     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6057
>
>     --
>     Rafael Weingärtner
>
>
>
> daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Posted by Rafael Weingärtner <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Mike for the feedback.
No problem Daan ;)

Tickets closed; depending on tickets, some I marked as closed, others as
resolved. I also configured the status of some to invalid, others to
incomplete, and others as fixed and so on.



On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <Mi...@netapp.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This one appears to have been fixed a long time ago. I marked it as Fixed
> and closed the ticket.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524
>
> This one is not a big deal. I marked it as Won’t Fix and closed the ticket.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432
>
> I went through all the listed tickets and did not see any others with me
> listed as either the Assignee or Reporter.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 12:15 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>     Good hard work again Rafael,
>
>     I’ll try to find time today to browse through them.
>
>     On 07/03/17 18:05, "Rafael Weingärtner" <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>         Hi folks,
>         Today I had gone through another batch of old Jira tickets and we
> have a
>         bunch that can be closed again. The following are the ones I have
> gone
>         through. Before I close any ticket I would like to check them with
> you,
>         especially the ones from a category called “Seemed fixed, but I
> would like
>         to hear some feedback here”. I will be waiting for your feedback
> before I
>         proceed to close any ticket.
>
>         - Jira tickets that have PRs and were already merged, or at least
> a commit
>         hash code reference
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9509
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9634
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9540
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9635
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9598
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-350
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-535
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3054
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7633
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976
>
>         - Jira ticket linked to a PR that is linked to a series of Jira
> tickets
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9533 (was
> this solved?)
>
>         - Seemed fixed, but I would like to hear some feedback here
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-245
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-371
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-429
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-438
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-458
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-486
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-506
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-561
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-692
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-696
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1036
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1306
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5650
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5642
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4870 (naming
>         conventions on Marvin?)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759
> (thoughts here
>         Daan?)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4523
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4365
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4232
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3896
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3477
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3012
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 (Mike
> Tutkowski,
>         is this still happenings? Is it possible for you to check?)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 (Mike,
> any
>         thoughts here?)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7379
> (title=200MB limit
>         setting too low for network.throttling.rate and
> vm.network.throttling.rate;
>         isn`t it a question for the operator/administrator to configure
> the default
>         value?)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7167
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7142 (let's
> open
>         tickets for specific issues and not for a broad class; then, the
> management
>         (for us) becomes easier)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7067
> (questions should
>         be directed to the mailing list)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7056
> (questions should
>         be directed to the mailing list)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7048
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6849
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6848
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6643
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6642
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6641
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6640
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6639
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6638
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6637
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6567
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6484
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6059
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6033
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9028 (seems
> more like a
>         question that no one replied than a bug)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9003
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8807
> (questions should
>         be directed to the mailing list)
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8806
> (questions should
>         be directed to the mailing list)
>
>         - Did not understand the ticket
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6074
>         -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6057
>
>         --
>         Rafael Weingärtner
>
>
>
>     daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com
>     www.shapeblue.com
>     53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>     @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Posted by "Tutkowski, Mike" <Mi...@netapp.com>.
Hi,

This one appears to have been fixed a long time ago. I marked it as Fixed and closed the ticket.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524

This one is not a big deal. I marked it as Won’t Fix and closed the ticket.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432

I went through all the listed tickets and did not see any others with me listed as either the Assignee or Reporter.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 12:15 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

    Good hard work again Rafael,
    
    I’ll try to find time today to browse through them.
    
    On 07/03/17 18:05, "Rafael Weingärtner" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    
        Hi folks,
        Today I had gone through another batch of old Jira tickets and we have a
        bunch that can be closed again. The following are the ones I have gone
        through. Before I close any ticket I would like to check them with you,
        especially the ones from a category called “Seemed fixed, but I would like
        to hear some feedback here”. I will be waiting for your feedback before I
        proceed to close any ticket.
        
        - Jira tickets that have PRs and were already merged, or at least a commit
        hash code reference
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9509
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9634
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9540
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9635
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9598
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-350
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-535
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3054
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7633
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976
        
        - Jira ticket linked to a PR that is linked to a series of Jira tickets
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9533 (was this solved?)
        
        - Seemed fixed, but I would like to hear some feedback here
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-245
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-371
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-429
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-438
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-458
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-486
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-506
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-561
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-692
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-696
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1036
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1306
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5650
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5642
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4870 (naming
        conventions on Marvin?)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759 (thoughts here
        Daan?)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4523
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4365
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4232
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3896
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3477
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3012
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 (Mike Tutkowski,
        is this still happenings? Is it possible for you to check?)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 (Mike, any
        thoughts here?)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7379 (title=200MB limit
        setting too low for network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate;
        isn`t it a question for the operator/administrator to configure the default
        value?)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7167
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7142 (let's open
        tickets for specific issues and not for a broad class; then, the management
        (for us) becomes easier)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7067 (questions should
        be directed to the mailing list)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7056 (questions should
        be directed to the mailing list)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7048
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6849
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6848
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6643
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6642
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6641
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6640
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6639
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6638
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6637
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6567
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6484
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6059
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6033
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9028 (seems more like a
        question that no one replied than a bug)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9003
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8807 (questions should
        be directed to the mailing list)
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8806 (questions should
        be directed to the mailing list)
        
        - Did not understand the ticket
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6074
        -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6057
        
        -- 
        Rafael Weingärtner
        
    
    
    daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com 
    www.shapeblue.com
    53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    @shapeblue
      
     
    
    


Re: More Jira tickets clean up

Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@shapeblue.com>.
Good hard work again Rafael,

I’ll try to find time today to browse through them.

On 07/03/17 18:05, "Rafael Weingärtner" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi folks,
    Today I had gone through another batch of old Jira tickets and we have a
    bunch that can be closed again. The following are the ones I have gone
    through. Before I close any ticket I would like to check them with you,
    especially the ones from a category called “Seemed fixed, but I would like
    to hear some feedback here”. I will be waiting for your feedback before I
    proceed to close any ticket.
    
    - Jira tickets that have PRs and were already merged, or at least a commit
    hash code reference
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9509
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9634
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9540
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9635
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9598
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-350
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-535
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3054
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7633
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976
    
    - Jira ticket linked to a PR that is linked to a series of Jira tickets
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9533 (was this solved?)
    
    - Seemed fixed, but I would like to hear some feedback here
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-245
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-371
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-429
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-438
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-458
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-486
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-506
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-561
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-692
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-696
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1036
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1306
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5650
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5642
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4870 (naming
    conventions on Marvin?)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759 (thoughts here
    Daan?)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4523
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4365
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4232
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3896
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3477
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3012
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524 (Mike Tutkowski,
    is this still happenings? Is it possible for you to check?)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432 (Mike, any
    thoughts here?)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7379 (title=200MB limit
    setting too low for network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate;
    isn`t it a question for the operator/administrator to configure the default
    value?)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7167
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7142 (let's open
    tickets for specific issues and not for a broad class; then, the management
    (for us) becomes easier)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7067 (questions should
    be directed to the mailing list)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7056 (questions should
    be directed to the mailing list)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7048
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6849
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6848
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6643
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6642
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6641
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6640
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6639
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6638
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6637
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6567
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6484
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6059
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6033
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9028 (seems more like a
    question that no one replied than a bug)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9003
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8807 (questions should
    be directed to the mailing list)
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8806 (questions should
    be directed to the mailing list)
    
    - Did not understand the ticket
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6074
    -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6057
    
    -- 
    Rafael Weingärtner
    


daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue