You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iotdb.apache.org by 孙泽嵩 <sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> on 2020/05/10 06:44:49 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Hi,
The vote for releasing Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.3 closes now as 72hr have passed.
The vote PASSES with1 (+1 binding) vote, 2 (+1 non-binding) votes,
and no further 0 or -1 votes.
+1 vote from :
+1 (binding) from Christofer Dutz,
+1 from Jialin Qiao,
+1 from Xiangdong Huang,
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfef4652594af3e3ba0561ebdd9e6fa8eaa549abbb2c7bf1d0c584da9%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfef4652594af3e3ba0561ebdd9e6fa8eaa549abbb2c7bf1d0c584da9@%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E>
I will now bring the vote to general@incubator.apache.org to get approval by the IPMC.
If this vote passes also, the release is accepted and will be published.
Thank you for your support.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University
孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Dawei Liu <at...@163.com>.
hi ,
Our community is getting better and we have more and more users.
This is something to be happy about.
Don't worry too much about voting
Best
———
Dawei Liu
On 05/11/2020 09:27, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
Hi Giorgio,
According to the previous discussion, ASF does not suggest removing anyone
who made contributions to the project/community,
and hopes them back in the future.
I agree with that.
Listing the above list is for inferring how many votes are reasonable.
Besides, it gives us (at least gives me) a lesson: when inviting a guy as a
PPMC, I will consider whether he/she loves the community and can continue
to contribute to the community for a longer time.
(We have already a large PPMC list because they are initial committers. Can
not change that...)
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Giorgio Zoppi <gi...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月11日周一 上午8:54写道：
> Hello,
> Usually active is a person is actively contributing to the project in the
> last six months at least. Formally we don't get out of a PPMC nobody,
> simply we ask if/she is still willing to contribute.
>
> Just 1c,
> Giorgio.
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Jialin Qiao <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>.
Hi,
Here is a guide of how to vote [1]. And yes, we need to invite more active PPMCs :).
[1] http://iotdb.apache.org/Development/VoteRelease.html
Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Dawei Liu" <at...@163.com>
> 发送时间: 2020-05-11 20:59:19 (星期一)
> 收件人: dev <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
> 抄送: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
> 主题: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
>
> Hi Christofer,
> You are absolutely right.
>
>
> 1. We should encourage and teach more people how to vote
>
> ?. We should consider whether to add more active people to become PPMC.
>
>
> Thanks
> ———
> Dawei Liu
>
>
> On 05/11/2020 20:14, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to point out that if so few active PPMCs are voting, this could be an issue ...
> Perhaps it's worth discussing to invite fresh PPMCs in.
>
> With PLC4X it was pretty similar situation. We had a big list of initial committers and PPMCs.
> When approaching graduation we simply voted to list only those PPMCs as Initial PMC for the TLP that actively expressed the wish to do so.
>
> I would just like to encourage everyone to actively help checking release candidates. Also the committers or not even committers.
> Even if your vote formally doesn't count, it usually does count. And it definitely usually helps getting voted in PPMC for most projects ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 11.05.20, 05:58 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Only 3 +1 votes are needed (and more +1’s than -1) to make a release. It is good if more people look at it as they may catch something the others missed. Most votes on release only get 3-5 votes so that’s fine.
>
> Re the PPMC this can be adjusted on graduation, it’s usually done by asking existing PPMC members if they want to be on the PMC of the TLP project. Having inactive (P)PMC members is not a big issues and they may be active again at some point in the future.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Dawei Liu <at...@163.com>.
Hi Christofer,
You are absolutely right.
1. We should encourage and teach more people how to vote
?. We should consider whether to add more active people to become PPMC.
Thanks
———
Dawei Liu
On 05/11/2020 20:14, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out that if so few active PPMCs are voting, this could be an issue ...
Perhaps it's worth discussing to invite fresh PPMCs in.
With PLC4X it was pretty similar situation. We had a big list of initial committers and PPMCs.
When approaching graduation we simply voted to list only those PPMCs as Initial PMC for the TLP that actively expressed the wish to do so.
I would just like to encourage everyone to actively help checking release candidates. Also the committers or not even committers.
Even if your vote formally doesn't count, it usually does count. And it definitely usually helps getting voted in PPMC for most projects ;-)
Chris
Am 11.05.20, 05:58 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
Only 3 +1 votes are needed (and more +1’s than -1) to make a release. It is good if more people look at it as they may catch something the others missed. Most votes on release only get 3-5 votes so that’s fine.
Re the PPMC this can be adjusted on graduation, it’s usually done by asking existing PPMC members if they want to be on the PMC of the TLP project. Having inactive (P)PMC members is not a big issues and they may be active again at some point in the future.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out that if so few active PPMCs are voting, this could be an issue ...
Perhaps it's worth discussing to invite fresh PPMCs in.
With PLC4X it was pretty similar situation. We had a big list of initial committers and PPMCs.
When approaching graduation we simply voted to list only those PPMCs as Initial PMC for the TLP that actively expressed the wish to do so.
I would just like to encourage everyone to actively help checking release candidates. Also the committers or not even committers.
Even if your vote formally doesn't count, it usually does count. And it definitely usually helps getting voted in PPMC for most projects ;-)
Chris
Am 11.05.20, 05:58 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
Only 3 +1 votes are needed (and more +1’s than -1) to make a release. It is good if more people look at it as they may catch something the others missed. Most votes on release only get 3-5 votes so that’s fine.
Re the PPMC this can be adjusted on graduation, it’s usually done by asking existing PPMC members if they want to be on the PMC of the TLP project. Having inactive (P)PMC members is not a big issues and they may be active again at some point in the future.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Only 3 +1 votes are needed (and more +1’s than -1) to make a release. It is good if more people look at it as they may catch something the others missed. Most votes on release only get 3-5 votes so that’s fine.
Re the PPMC this can be adjusted on graduation, it’s usually done by asking existing PPMC members if they want to be on the PMC of the TLP project. Having inactive (P)PMC members is not a big issues and they may be active again at some point in the future.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Giorgio,
According to the previous discussion, ASF does not suggest removing anyone
who made contributions to the project/community,
and hopes them back in the future.
I agree with that.
Listing the above list is for inferring how many votes are reasonable.
Besides, it gives us (at least gives me) a lesson: when inviting a guy as a
PPMC, I will consider whether he/she loves the community and can continue
to contribute to the community for a longer time.
(We have already a large PPMC list because they are initial committers. Can
not change that...)
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Giorgio Zoppi <gi...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月11日周一 上午8:54写道：
> Hello,
> Usually active is a person is actively contributing to the project in the
> last six months at least. Formally we don't get out of a PPMC nobody,
> simply we ask if/she is still willing to contribute.
>
> Just 1c,
> Giorgio.
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Giorgio Zoppi <gi...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Usually active is a person is actively contributing to the project in the
last six months at least. Formally we don't get out of a PPMC nobody,
simply we ask if/she is still willing to contribute.
Just 1c,
Giorgio.
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Chris,
> You are quite a large ppmc and only two of you voted.
The large PPMC group is because of a long list of initial committers...
I remember we had a thread in the private@ for discussing how to face to
the inactive PPMCs.
According to my observation, in the last 6 months,
- active PPMCs on the source code repo (github) are Tian Jiang, Lei Rui,
Tianan Li, Jialin Qiao, Jinrui Zhang, Jincheng Sun, Julian Feinauer and me
(8/20) (the order is randomly).
- active PPMCs on dev@ or JIRA are Yi Xu, Tian Jiang, Tianan Li, Jialin
Qiao, Jincheng Sun, Julian and me (7/20).
- active PPMCs on private@ or JIRA are Tian Jiang, Tianan Li, Jialin Qiao,
Jincheng Sun, Julian, Shuo Zhang, Jianmin Wang, Jun Yuan and me (9/20).
The list is just from my sight according to my impression. No a clear rule
to define what is "active". No meaning to blame anyone. It is generated...
just by if someone ask me a question, "which PPMCs you usually meet on the
community", I can remember these names first time.
So, according to the above list, I think 3-6 votes from PPMCs is
reasonable. It is hard to get votes from more than 10 PPMCs... (as we have
no rights to force the "inactive" guys doing that..)
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> 于2020年5月10日周日 下午3:58写道：
> Hi all,
>
> Well this result is really a little puzzling to me.
> You are quite a large ppmc and only two of you voted.
>
> That's not good.
>
> I'll try to remember not to be one of the first to vote next time.
>
> Chris
> ________________________________
> Von: 孙泽嵩 <sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Mai 2020 08:44
> An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
> Betreff: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
>
> Hi,
>
> The vote for releasing Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.3 closes now as 72hr
> have passed.
> The vote PASSES with1 (+1 binding) vote, 2 (+1 non-binding) votes,
> and no further 0 or -1 votes.
>
> +1 vote from :
>
> +1 (binding) from Christofer Dutz,
> +1 from Jialin Qiao,
> +1 from Xiangdong Huang,
>
>
>
> The vote thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfef4652594af3e3ba0561ebdd9e6fa8eaa549abbb2c7bf1d0c584da9%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfef4652594af3e3ba0561ebdd9e6fa8eaa549abbb2c7bf1d0c584da9@%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E
> >
>
> I will now bring the vote to general@incubator.apache.org to get approval
> by the IPMC.
> If this vote passes also, the release is accepted and will be published.
>
> Thank you for your support.
>
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Zesong Sun
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 孙泽嵩
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi all,
Well this result is really a little puzzling to me.
You are quite a large ppmc and only two of you voted.
That's not good.
I'll try to remember not to be one of the first to vote next time.
Chris
________________________________
Von: 孙泽嵩 <sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Mai 2020 08:44
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release
Hi,
The vote for releasing Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.3 closes now as 72hr have passed.
The vote PASSES with1 (+1 binding) vote, 2 (+1 non-binding) votes,
and no further 0 or -1 votes.
+1 vote from :
+1 (binding) from Christofer Dutz,
+1 from Jialin Qiao,
+1 from Xiangdong Huang,
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfef4652594af3e3ba0561ebdd9e6fa8eaa549abbb2c7bf1d0c584da9%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfef4652594af3e3ba0561ebdd9e6fa8eaa549abbb2c7bf1d0c584da9@%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E>
I will now bring the vote to general@incubator.apache.org to get approval by the IPMC.
If this vote passes also, the release is accepted and will be published.
Thank you for your support.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University
孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院