[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3869) Docs mention supporting both subcriptionName and subscriptName in stomp

["Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13286885#comment-13286885 ] 

Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-3869:
-----------------------------------

Both forms have been supported for quite some time now.  I think with the 5.6 release its acceptable to move on and just support the one that's actually spelled correctly.  The clients can if they want inspect the connected frame to determine that they are talking to AMQ 5.6 as the server property will identify this and allow then use the correct header if they still want to support the older one to connect to pre 5.6 brokers. 
                
> Docs mention supporting both subcriptionName and subscriptName in stomp
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3869
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3869
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: stomp
>    Affects Versions: 5.6.0
>            Reporter: Alan Hudson
>         Attachments: pc_diff.patch, st_diff.patch
>
>
> This page mentions supporting both names http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html
> The stomp php client from here: http://stomp.fusesource.org  uses the old style.  Likely others are as well.
> Supporting both is likely best for awhile, or at least at minimum the docs should be updated to indicate the old style is no longer supported.  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira