You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com> on 2009/02/12 20:43:48 UTC
IllegalStateException in binding.jms for null parameters...
Hey guys,
I've just taken a functional binding.jms service and in order to try
and utilise this as a more traditional JMS service, I added the
tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject markup to the composite file....
However, when I attempt to invoke an operation with no parameters I
get the following stack:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JMS ObjectMessage payload
not Serializable: null
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.ObjectMessageProcessor.createJMSMessage(ObjectMessageProcessor.java:63)
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.AbstractMessageProcessor.insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage(AbstractMessageProcessor.java:83)
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invokeRequest(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:81)
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invoke(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:63)
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke(RRBJMSBindingInvoker.java:202)
This operation has the signature of:
public void throwException();
Looking through the wireformat code I can't see anywhere that it
checks that the payload isn't null before throwing this exception - is
this what we should expect?
Cheers,
Dave.
Re: IllegalStateException in binding.jms for null parameters...
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
I'm just reading around this one - I think I'd be happy with using a
custom message processor - so I guess my urgency isn't quite as urgent
:)
Cheers,
Dave.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, my apologises - I forgot to check Jira!
>>
>> Is there any schedule for a release of the 1.x codebase? Or even a 1.4.1?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> I've just taken a functional binding.jms service and in order to try
>> >> and utilise this as a more traditional JMS service, I added the
>> >> tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject markup to the composite file....
>> >>
>> >> However, when I attempt to invoke an operation with no parameters I
>> >> get the following stack:
>> >>
>> >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JMS ObjectMessage payload
>> >> not Serializable: null
>> >> at
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.ObjectMessageProcessor.createJMSMessage(ObjectMessageProcessor.java:63)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.AbstractMessageProcessor.insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage(AbstractMessageProcessor.java:83)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invokeRequest(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:81)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invoke(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:63)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke(RRBJMSBindingInvoker.java:202)
>> >>
>> >> This operation has the signature of:
>> >>
>> >> public void throwException();
>> >>
>> >> Looking through the wireformat code I can't see anywhere that it
>> >> checks that the payload isn't null before throwing this exception - is
>> >> this what we should expect?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Dave.
>> >
>> > Hi Dave
>> >
>> > We came across this and it was fixed in the 1.x codebase under
>> > TUSCANY-2799.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>
> We haven't discussed it yet Dave but we'll have to do something as people
> have been making quite a lot of changes in 1.x. Personally I would probably
> prefer a 1.5 in a little while. What's your urgency on this one?
>
> Simon
>
Re: IllegalStateException in binding.jms for null parameters...
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Ah, my apologises - I forgot to check Jira!
>
> Is there any schedule for a release of the 1.x codebase? Or even a 1.4.1?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> I've just taken a functional binding.jms service and in order to try
> >> and utilise this as a more traditional JMS service, I added the
> >> tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject markup to the composite file....
> >>
> >> However, when I attempt to invoke an operation with no parameters I
> >> get the following stack:
> >>
> >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JMS ObjectMessage payload
> >> not Serializable: null
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.ObjectMessageProcessor.createJMSMessage(ObjectMessageProcessor.java:63)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.AbstractMessageProcessor.insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage(AbstractMessageProcessor.java:83)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invokeRequest(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:81)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invoke(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:63)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke(RRBJMSBindingInvoker.java:202)
> >>
> >> This operation has the signature of:
> >>
> >> public void throwException();
> >>
> >> Looking through the wireformat code I can't see anywhere that it
> >> checks that the payload isn't null before throwing this exception - is
> >> this what we should expect?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Dave.
> >
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > We came across this and it was fixed in the 1.x codebase under
> TUSCANY-2799.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
We haven't discussed it yet Dave but we'll have to do something as people
have been making quite a lot of changes in 1.x. Personally I would probably
prefer a 1.5 in a little while. What's your urgency on this one?
Simon
Re: IllegalStateException in binding.jms for null parameters...
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
Ah, my apologises - I forgot to check Jira!
Is there any schedule for a release of the 1.x codebase? Or even a 1.4.1?
Cheers,
Dave.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I've just taken a functional binding.jms service and in order to try
>> and utilise this as a more traditional JMS service, I added the
>> tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject markup to the composite file....
>>
>> However, when I attempt to invoke an operation with no parameters I
>> get the following stack:
>>
>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JMS ObjectMessage payload
>> not Serializable: null
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.ObjectMessageProcessor.createJMSMessage(ObjectMessageProcessor.java:63)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.AbstractMessageProcessor.insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage(AbstractMessageProcessor.java:83)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invokeRequest(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:81)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invoke(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:63)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke(RRBJMSBindingInvoker.java:202)
>>
>> This operation has the signature of:
>>
>> public void throwException();
>>
>> Looking through the wireformat code I can't see anywhere that it
>> checks that the payload isn't null before throwing this exception - is
>> this what we should expect?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>
> Hi Dave
>
> We came across this and it was fixed in the 1.x codebase under TUSCANY-2799.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
Re: IllegalStateException in binding.jms for null parameters...
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've just taken a functional binding.jms service and in order to try
> and utilise this as a more traditional JMS service, I added the
> tuscany:wireFormat.jmsObject markup to the composite file....
>
> However, when I attempt to invoke an operation with no parameters I
> get the following stack:
>
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JMS ObjectMessage payload
> not Serializable: null
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.ObjectMessageProcessor.createJMSMessage(ObjectMessageProcessor.java:63)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.AbstractMessageProcessor.insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage(AbstractMessageProcessor.java:83)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invokeRequest(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:81)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.wireformat.jmsobject.runtime.WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.invoke(WireFormatJMSObjectReferenceInterceptor.java:63)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke(RRBJMSBindingInvoker.java:202)
>
> This operation has the signature of:
>
> public void throwException();
>
> Looking through the wireformat code I can't see anywhere that it
> checks that the payload isn't null before throwing this exception - is
> this what we should expect?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
Hi Dave
We came across this and it was fixed in the 1.x codebase under TUSCANY-2799.
Regards
Simon