You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Legolas Woodland <le...@gmail.com> on 2006/10/01 01:15:44 UTC
strange problem with ADF faces and tomcat versions
Hi
thank you for reading my post
i have faced a very strange problem with ADF faces and tomcat.
is there any condition that an ADF Faces application works fine in my
computer (on both OC4J and TOMCAT ) but does not works in production
tomcat ?
indeed i managed all database stuff and also i add all adf installer
(ADF faces libraries)library to my application web-inf/lib folder , now
it works fine in local tomcat but when i upload it to server none of
buttons or action link works.
i tried to debug it using firefox javascript console and i find the
following stuff :
Error: _submitFormCheck is not defined
Source File: http://www.mydomain.com/app/faces/index.jsp
Line: 190
Error: _checkLoad is not defined
Source File: http://www.mydomain.com/app/faces/index.jsp
Line: 1
Error: _checkUnload is not defined
Source File: http://www.mydomain.com/app/faces/index.jsp
Line: 1
Error: _defaultTZ is not defined
Source File: http://www.mydomain.com/app/work_services.jsp
Line: 20
can some one please help me with this problem ?
I am really stocked with this.
thank you.
RE: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com>.
Mathias,
Thanks for the reply. I am using snapshot 1.1.5 of both tomohawk and myfaces, also the latest of trinidad.
I am using it to deploy it on Jboss 4.0.4CR2.
How ever I am not using facelets. I am getting the following exception.
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentSca
nner.deploy(URLDeploymentScanner.java:334)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentSca
nner.scan(URLDeploymentScanner.java:504)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeployme
ntScanner$ScannerThread.doScan(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:207)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeployme
ntScanner$ScannerThread.loop(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:218)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeployme
ntScanner$ScannerThread.run(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:197)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
: String index out of range: -1
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1768)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator.c
heckJar(FacesConfigurator.java:232)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] at org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator.l
ogMetaInf(FacesConfigurator.java:184)
23:55:26,202 ERROR [STDERR] ... 93 more
Any idea or pointers. I am not doing anything fancy.
Thanks
Chaitanya Kadaru
-----Original Message-----
From: mwessendorf@gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:42 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
I use 1.1.5-SNAP of both (myfaces/tom) , trin and facelets in a project web.xml says:
<web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"
version="2.4">
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ALTERNATE_VIEW_HANDLER</param-name>
<param-value>com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler</param-value>
</context-param>
<!-- Use Documents Saved as *.xhtml -->
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name>
<param-value>.xhtml</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>facelets.LIBRARIES</param-name>
<param-value>/WEB-INF/tomahawk.taglib.xml</param-value>
</context-param>
<!-- Use client-side state saving. In Trinidad, it is an
optimized, token-based mechanism that is almost always a
better choice than the standard JSF server-side state saving. -->
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>client</param-value>
<!--param-value>server</param-value-->
</context-param>
<!--context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>all</param-value>
</context-param-->
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
</context-param>
<filter>
<filter-name>trinidad</filter-name>
<filter-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter</filter-class>
</filter>
<filter>
<filter-name>MyFacesExtensionsFilter</filter-name>
<filter-class>org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter</filter-class>
<init-param>
<param-name>maxFileSize</param-name>
<param-value>20m</param-value>
</init-param>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>trinidad</filter-name>
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
</filter-mapping>
<!-- extension mapping for adding <script/>, <link/>, and other resource tags to JSF-pages -->
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>MyFacesExtensionsFilter</filter-name>
<!-- servlet-name must match the name of your javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet entry -->
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
</filter-mapping>
<!-- extension mapping for serving page-independent resources (javascript, stylesheets, images, etc.) -->
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>MyFacesExtensionsFilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/myFacesExtensionResource/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
<!-- Listener, to allow Jetty serving MyFaces apps -->
<listener>
<listener-class>org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener</listener-class>
</listener>
<!-- Faces Servlet -->
<servlet>
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<!-- resource loader servlet -->
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<!-- Faces Servlet Mappings -->
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<!-- Welcome Files -->
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>index.html</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
</web-app>
pom.xml says:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk</groupId>
<artifactId>tomahawk</artifactId>
<version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
<artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId>
<version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
<artifactId>myfaces-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Apache Trinidad -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad</groupId>
<artifactId>trinidad-api</artifactId>
<version>incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad</groupId>
<artifactId>trinidad-impl</artifactId>
<version>incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
HTH,
M
On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
>
> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the web.xml
>
> or
>
> a link to a sample where they used both.
>
> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I use 1.1.5-SNAP of both (myfaces/tom) , trin and facelets in a project
web.xml says:
<web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"
version="2.4">
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ALTERNATE_VIEW_HANDLER</param-name>
<param-value>com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler</param-value>
</context-param>
<!-- Use Documents Saved as *.xhtml -->
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name>
<param-value>.xhtml</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>facelets.LIBRARIES</param-name>
<param-value>/WEB-INF/tomahawk.taglib.xml</param-value>
</context-param>
<!-- Use client-side state saving. In Trinidad, it is an
optimized, token-based mechanism that is almost always a
better choice than the standard JSF server-side state saving. -->
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>client</param-value>
<!--param-value>server</param-value-->
</context-param>
<!--context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>all</param-value>
</context-param-->
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
</context-param>
<filter>
<filter-name>trinidad</filter-name>
<filter-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter</filter-class>
</filter>
<filter>
<filter-name>MyFacesExtensionsFilter</filter-name>
<filter-class>org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter</filter-class>
<init-param>
<param-name>maxFileSize</param-name>
<param-value>20m</param-value>
</init-param>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>trinidad</filter-name>
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
</filter-mapping>
<!-- extension mapping for adding <script/>, <link/>, and other
resource tags to JSF-pages -->
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>MyFacesExtensionsFilter</filter-name>
<!-- servlet-name must match the name of your
javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet entry -->
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
</filter-mapping>
<!-- extension mapping for serving page-independent resources
(javascript, stylesheets, images, etc.) -->
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>MyFacesExtensionsFilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/myFacesExtensionResource/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
<!-- Listener, to allow Jetty serving MyFaces apps -->
<listener>
<listener-class>org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener</listener-class>
</listener>
<!-- Faces Servlet -->
<servlet>
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<!-- resource loader servlet -->
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<!-- Faces Servlet Mappings -->
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>faces</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<!-- Welcome Files -->
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>index.html</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
</web-app>
pom.xml says:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk</groupId>
<artifactId>tomahawk</artifactId>
<version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
<artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId>
<version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
<artifactId>myfaces-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Apache Trinidad -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad</groupId>
<artifactId>trinidad-api</artifactId>
<version>incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad</groupId>
<artifactId>trinidad-impl</artifactId>
<version>incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
HTH,
M
On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
>
> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the web.xml
>
> or
>
> a link to a sample where they used both.
>
> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>.
see http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Building_With_Maven for MyFaces
build instructions.
On 10/9/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jeff
>
> So I shall try to move to the latest snapshot since that may be better.
>
> Is there a document or link describing how I checkout myfaces and tomahawk using svn and how I build it using maven for the jars.
>
> I do the same thing for trinidad and I would like to do it for all of the above so each time I just need to update svn and then get the latest jars and the fixes that come along with them.
>
> Your help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Bischoff [mailto:jbischoff@klkurz.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:52 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
>
> See [1]. It doesn't include Trinidad in the matrix, but it should get you started (with a compatible combination of MyFaces and Tomahawk)
>
> Note that your current combination is not marked as compatible.
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff Bischoff
> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru wrote:
> > Martin
> >
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > Should I have to use the latest nightly build of tomahawk or myfaces? Or both?
> >
> > It seems to go into an infinite loop when I use
> >
> > Myfaces 1.1.4
> > Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > Trinidad incubator m1 snapshot svn version - 452680
> >
> > If some one can give me a working combination version numbers of all the above that would be great.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Chaitanya Kadaru
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:07 PM
> > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
> >
> > If you want to use both Trinidad and Tomahawk, you should use a current nightly build - we've committed a lot of bug-fixes for compatibility of the two frameworks.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
> >>
> >> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the
> >> web.xml
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> a link to a sample where they used both.
> >>
> >> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Chaitanya Kadaru
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
RE: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com>.
Thanks Jeff
So I shall try to move to the latest snapshot since that may be better.
Is there a document or link describing how I checkout myfaces and tomahawk using svn and how I build it using maven for the jars.
I do the same thing for trinidad and I would like to do it for all of the above so each time I just need to update svn and then get the latest jars and the fixes that come along with them.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Chaitanya Kadaru
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Bischoff [mailto:jbischoff@klkurz.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:52 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
See [1]. It doesn't include Trinidad in the matrix, but it should get you started (with a compatible combination of MyFaces and Tomahawk)
Note that your current combination is not marked as compatible.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Chaitanya Kadaru wrote:
> Martin
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Should I have to use the latest nightly build of tomahawk or myfaces? Or both?
>
> It seems to go into an infinite loop when I use
>
> Myfaces 1.1.4
> Tomahawk 1.1.2
> Trinidad incubator m1 snapshot svn version - 452680
>
> If some one can give me a working combination version numbers of all the above that would be great.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:07 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
>
> If you want to use both Trinidad and Tomahawk, you should use a current nightly build - we've committed a lot of bug-fixes for compatibility of the two frameworks.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
>>
>> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the
>> web.xml
>>
>> or
>>
>> a link to a sample where they used both.
>>
>> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Chaitanya Kadaru
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
>
Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com>.
See [1]. It doesn't include Trinidad in the matrix, but it should get
you started (with a compatible combination of MyFaces and Tomahawk)
Note that your current combination is not marked as compatible.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Chaitanya Kadaru wrote:
> Martin
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Should I have to use the latest nightly build of tomahawk or myfaces? Or both?
>
> It seems to go into an infinite loop when I use
>
> Myfaces 1.1.4
> Tomahawk 1.1.2
> Trinidad incubator m1 snapshot svn version - 452680
>
> If some one can give me a working combination version numbers of all the above that would be great.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:07 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
>
> If you want to use both Trinidad and Tomahawk, you should use a current nightly build - we've committed a lot of bug-fixes for compatibility of the two frameworks.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
>>
>> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the web.xml
>>
>> or
>>
>> a link to a sample where they used both.
>>
>> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Chaitanya Kadaru
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
>
RE: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com>.
Martin
Thanks for your answer.
Should I have to use the latest nightly build of tomahawk or myfaces? Or both?
It seems to go into an infinite loop when I use
Myfaces 1.1.4
Tomahawk 1.1.2
Trinidad incubator m1 snapshot svn version - 452680
If some one can give me a working combination version numbers of all the above that would be great.
Thanks
Chaitanya Kadaru
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:07 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
If you want to use both Trinidad and Tomahawk, you should use a current nightly build - we've committed a lot of bug-fixes for compatibility of the two frameworks.
regards,
Martin
On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
>
> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the web.xml
>
> or
>
> a link to a sample where they used both.
>
> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
If you want to use both Trinidad and Tomahawk, you should use a
current nightly build - we've committed a lot of bug-fixes for
compatibility of the two frameworks.
regards,
Martin
On 10/3/06, Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
>
> Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the web.xml
>
> or
>
> a link to a sample where they used both.
>
> Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chaitanya Kadaru
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Tomahawk and trinidad
Posted by Chaitanya Kadaru <ch...@oracle.com>.
Hi
I am trying to use both trinidad and tomahawk in the same project.
Can you please pass me the code snippet for the filters in the web.xml
or
a link to a sample where they used both.
Somehow when I try I don't seem to get the faces components rendered.
Thanks
Chaitanya Kadaru