You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com> on 2014/03/03 15:49:53 UTC
Decouple examples in assembly from our POMs?
L.S.,
While applying some POM fixes just a minute ago, I noticed our
examples are using our own parent POM. Wouldn't it better to have
examples in the assembly that are more self-contained and do not
depend on information in our other POM files? That way, people can
just copy the example and modify it for their own environment with
minimal effort.
We already have resource filtering in place for those examples POMs
and we have a separate copy of the examples parent file in the
assembly, so the changes required should be minimal.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
Re: Decouple examples in assembly from our POMs?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1 it screws me up everytime I import from an exploded SMX distribution.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> The examples should be standalone.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/03/2014 03:49 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> While applying some POM fixes just a minute ago, I noticed our
>> examples are using our own parent POM. Wouldn't it better to have
>> examples in the assembly that are more self-contained and do not
>> depend on information in our other POM files? That way, people can
>> just copy the example and modify it for their own environment with
>> minimal effort.
>>
>> We already have resource filtering in place for those examples POMs
>> and we have a separate copy of the examples parent file in the
>> assembly, so the changes required should be minimal.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Decouple examples in assembly from our POMs?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
The examples should be standalone.
Regards
JB
On 03/03/2014 03:49 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> While applying some POM fixes just a minute ago, I noticed our
> examples are using our own parent POM. Wouldn't it better to have
> examples in the assembly that are more self-contained and do not
> depend on information in our other POM files? That way, people can
> just copy the example and modify it for their own environment with
> minimal effort.
>
> We already have resource filtering in place for those examples POMs
> and we have a separate copy of the examples parent file in the
> assembly, so the changes required should be minimal.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Decouple examples in assembly from our POMs?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,
I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2264 to keep track of this.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
<kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's a goo idea.
>
>
> On 03.03.2014 15:49, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> While applying some POM fixes just a minute ago, I noticed our
>> examples are using our own parent POM. Wouldn't it better to have
>> examples in the assembly that are more self-contained and do not
>> depend on information in our other POM files? That way, people can
>> just copy the example and modify it for their own environment with
>> minimal effort.
>>
>> We already have resource filtering in place for those examples POMs
>> and we have a separate copy of the examples parent file in the
>> assembly, so the changes required should be minimal.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Re: Decouple examples in assembly from our POMs?
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
I think it's a goo idea.
On 03.03.2014 15:49, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> While applying some POM fixes just a minute ago, I noticed our
> examples are using our own parent POM. Wouldn't it better to have
> examples in the assembly that are more self-contained and do not
> depend on information in our other POM files? That way, people can
> just copy the example and modify it for their own environment with
> minimal effort.
>
> We already have resource filtering in place for those examples POMs
> and we have a separate copy of the examples parent file in the
> assembly, so the changes required should be minimal.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak