You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> on 2013/06/01 01:04:46 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
The RC tag in svn is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat, June
1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
http://s.apache.org/WKD
Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the ones
voted on before in
http://s.apache.org/2041move
Thanks for your voting
Cos
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat, June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
+1 (non-binding)
pulled the RC into Bigtop, ran the usual battery of tests on our
public Jenkins
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat, June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
+1 (non-binding)
pulled the RC into Bigtop, ran the usual battery of tests on our
public Jenkins
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:17PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
I guess 2.0.4-alpha was cut differently for whatever reason, 'cause i see the
UNRELEASED date in the source tarball.
As I said - if anyone feels strongly about it I will alter the CHANGES.txt
files
thanks,
Cos
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> >> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
> >> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
> >
> > Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> > rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
> >> hth,
> >> Arun
> >>
> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> >>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> >>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> >>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on rc1
> >>>>
> >>>> Thx
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> >>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> >>>>> situation:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> >>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >>>>>> the vote ends).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>>>>>> looks good to me.
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joep
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>>>>> r1465124
> >>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>>>>>> noted
> >>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>>>>>> doing
> >>>>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>>>>>> Also, I
> >>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>>>>>> aware
> >>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>>>> couple of
> >>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>>>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>>>>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>>>>>> days,
> >>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>
> >> --
> >> Arun C. Murthy
> >> Hortonworks Inc.
> >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:17PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
I guess 2.0.4-alpha was cut differently for whatever reason, 'cause i see the
UNRELEASED date in the source tarball.
As I said - if anyone feels strongly about it I will alter the CHANGES.txt
files
thanks,
Cos
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> >> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
> >> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
> >
> > Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> > rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
> >> hth,
> >> Arun
> >>
> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> >>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> >>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> >>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on rc1
> >>>>
> >>>> Thx
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> >>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> >>>>> situation:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> >>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >>>>>> the vote ends).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>>>>>> looks good to me.
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joep
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>>>>> r1465124
> >>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>>>>>> noted
> >>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>>>>>> doing
> >>>>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>>>>>> Also, I
> >>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>>>>>> aware
> >>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>>>> couple of
> >>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>>>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>>>>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>>>>>> days,
> >>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>
> >> --
> >> Arun C. Murthy
> >> Hortonworks Inc.
> >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:17PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
I guess 2.0.4-alpha was cut differently for whatever reason, 'cause i see the
UNRELEASED date in the source tarball.
As I said - if anyone feels strongly about it I will alter the CHANGES.txt
files
thanks,
Cos
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> >> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
> >> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
> >
> > Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> > rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
> >> hth,
> >> Arun
> >>
> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> >>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> >>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> >>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on rc1
> >>>>
> >>>> Thx
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> >>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> >>>>> situation:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> >>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >>>>>> the vote ends).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>>>>>> looks good to me.
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joep
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>>>>> r1465124
> >>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>>>>>> noted
> >>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>>>>>> doing
> >>>>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>>>>>> Also, I
> >>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>>>>>> aware
> >>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>>>> couple of
> >>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>>>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>>>>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>>>>>> days,
> >>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>
> >> --
> >> Arun C. Murthy
> >> Hortonworks Inc.
> >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
>> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
>
> Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
>> hth,
>> Arun
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
>>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>>>
>>>> +1 on rc1
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>>>> situation:
>>>>>
>>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>>>
>>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>>>> noted
>>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>
>> --
>> Arun C. Murthy
>> Hortonworks Inc.
>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>
>>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
>> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
>
> Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
>> hth,
>> Arun
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
>>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>>>
>>>> +1 on rc1
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>>>> situation:
>>>>>
>>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>>>
>>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>>>> noted
>>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>
>> --
>> Arun C. Murthy
>> Hortonworks Inc.
>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>
>>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
>> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
>
> Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
>> hth,
>> Arun
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
>>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>>>
>>>> +1 on rc1
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>>>> situation:
>>>>>
>>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>>>
>>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>>>> noted
>>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>
>> --
>> Arun C. Murthy
>> Hortonworks Inc.
>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>
>>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
>> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
>
> Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
>> hth,
>> Arun
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
>>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>>>
>>>> +1 on rc1
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>>>> situation:
>>>>>
>>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>>>
>>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>>>> noted
>>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>
>> --
>> Arun C. Murthy
>> Hortonworks Inc.
>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>
>>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
Thanks,
Cos
> hth,
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> > cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
> >
> > Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> >> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> >> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> >>
> >> +1 on rc1
> >>
> >> Thx
> >>
> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Alejandro,
> >>>
> >>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> >>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> >>> situation:
> >>>
> >>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >>>
> >>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> >>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>
> >>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >>>> the vote ends).
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>>>> looks good to me.
> >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joep
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>>> r1465124
> >>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>>>> noted
> >>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>>>> into
> >>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>>>> doing
> >>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>>>> Also, I
> >>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>>>> aware
> >>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>>>> source
> >>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>> couple of
> >>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>>>> days,
> >>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Alejandro
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
Thanks,
Cos
> hth,
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> > cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
> >
> > Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> >> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> >> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> >>
> >> +1 on rc1
> >>
> >> Thx
> >>
> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Alejandro,
> >>>
> >>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> >>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> >>> situation:
> >>>
> >>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >>>
> >>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> >>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>
> >>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >>>> the vote ends).
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>>>> looks good to me.
> >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joep
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>>> r1465124
> >>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>>>> noted
> >>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>>>> into
> >>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>>>> doing
> >>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>>>> Also, I
> >>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>>>> aware
> >>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>>>> source
> >>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>> couple of
> >>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>>>> days,
> >>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Alejandro
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
Thanks,
Cos
> hth,
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> > cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
> >
> > Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> >> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> >> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
> >>
> >> +1 on rc1
> >>
> >> Thx
> >>
> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Alejandro,
> >>>
> >>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> >>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> >>> situation:
> >>>
> >>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >>>
> >>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> >>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>
> >>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >>>> the vote ends).
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>>>> looks good to me.
> >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joep
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>>>> r1465124
> >>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>>>> noted
> >>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>>>> into
> >>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>>>> doing
> >>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>>>> Also, I
> >>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>>>> aware
> >>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>>>> source
> >>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>>>> couple of
> >>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>>>> timeout
> >>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>>>> days,
> >>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Alejandro
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
hth,
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>
> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>
>> +1 on rc1
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Alejandro,
>>>
>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>> situation:
>>>
>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>
>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>
>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>> noted
>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>> doing
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>> source
>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>> that
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alejandro
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
hth,
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>
> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>
>> +1 on rc1
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Alejandro,
>>>
>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>> situation:
>>>
>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>
>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>
>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>> noted
>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>> doing
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>> source
>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>> that
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alejandro
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
hth,
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>
> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>
>> +1 on rc1
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Alejandro,
>>>
>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>> situation:
>>>
>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>
>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>
>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>> noted
>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>> doing
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>> source
>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>> that
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alejandro
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
hth,
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
>
> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>
>> +1 on rc1
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Alejandro,
>>>
>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
>>> situation:
>>>
>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>
>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>
>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>>>> noted
>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>>>> doing
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>>>> source
>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>> that
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alejandro
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
Regards,
Cos
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>
> +1 on rc1
>
> Thx
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Alejandro,
> >
> > I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> > unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> > situation:
> >
> > Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >
> > But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> > is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>
> >> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >> the vote ends).
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>> looks good to me.
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Joep
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>> and
> >>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>> r1465124
> >>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>
> >>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>
> >>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>> noted
> >>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cos
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>> in
> >>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>> into
> >>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>> doing
> >>>> this.
> >>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>> Also, I
> >>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>> the
> >>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>> aware
> >>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>> source
> >>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of
> >>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>> timeout
> >>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>> should
> >>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>> that
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>> days,
> >>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>> to the
> >>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
Regards,
Cos
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>
> +1 on rc1
>
> Thx
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Alejandro,
> >
> > I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> > unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> > situation:
> >
> > Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >
> > But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> > is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>
> >> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >> the vote ends).
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>> looks good to me.
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Joep
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>> and
> >>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>> r1465124
> >>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>
> >>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>
> >>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>> noted
> >>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cos
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>> in
> >>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>> into
> >>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>> doing
> >>>> this.
> >>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>> Also, I
> >>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>> the
> >>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>> aware
> >>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>> source
> >>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of
> >>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>> timeout
> >>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>> should
> >>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>> that
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>> days,
> >>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>> to the
> >>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
Regards,
Cos
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>
> +1 on rc1
>
> Thx
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Alejandro,
> >
> > I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> > unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> > situation:
> >
> > Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
> >
> > But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> > is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>
> >> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> >> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> >> the vote ends).
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> >>> looks good to me.
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Joep
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> >>>> and
> >>>> later. It has been committed as
> >>>> r1465124
> >>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >>>>
> >>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >>>>
> >>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> >>> noted
> >>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cos
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>> Alejandro,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> >>>> in
> >>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> >>>> into
> >>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> >>> doing
> >>>> this.
> >>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> >>>> Also, I
> >>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> >>> the
> >>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> >>>> aware
> >>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> >>>> source
> >>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> >>>> couple of
> >>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> >>> timeout
> >>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> >>>> should
> >>>>>> be there empty).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> All,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> >>> that
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>> like to release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> >>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> >>>> Sat,
> >>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> >>>> days,
> >>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> >>>> to the
> >>>>>>> ones
> >>>>>>> voted on before in
> >>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
we could coin the term 'optimistic release date' for this :)
Alejandro
(phone typing)
On Jun 3, 2013, at 0:18, Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> [...] an easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends.
>
> +1 This is what I've done for release candidate builds.
>
> Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ok, if this the consensus on the issue, then tonight I will cut rc2 with only
CHANGES.txt release dates update. After that I will extend the vote once
again.
Sorry for the hassle to all who did voted before.
Cos
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:18AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > [...] an easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends.
>
> +1 This is what I've done for release candidate builds.
>
> Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ok, if this the consensus on the issue, then tonight I will cut rc2 with only
CHANGES.txt release dates update. After that I will extend the vote once
again.
Sorry for the hassle to all who did voted before.
Cos
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:18AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > [...] an easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends.
>
> +1 This is what I've done for release candidate builds.
>
> Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ok, if this the consensus on the issue, then tonight I will cut rc2 with only
CHANGES.txt release dates update. After that I will extend the vote once
again.
Sorry for the hassle to all who did voted before.
Cos
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:18AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > [...] an easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends.
>
> +1 This is what I've done for release candidate builds.
>
> Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> [...] an easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends.
+1 This is what I've done for release candidate builds.
Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we are not cutting a new rc for other reason
+1 on rc1
Thx
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> situation:
>
> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>
> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>
>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>> the vote ends).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>> looks good to me.
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Joep
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>> and
>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>> r1465124
>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>
>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>
>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>> noted
>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>
>>>> Cos
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>> in
>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>> into
>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>> doing
>>>> this.
>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>> Also, I
>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>> the
>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>> aware
>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>> source
>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of
>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>> timeout
>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>> should
>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>> that
>>>> I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>> of
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>> days,
>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>> to the
>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we are not cutting a new rc for other reason
+1 on rc1
Thx
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> situation:
>
> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>
> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>
>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>> the vote ends).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>> looks good to me.
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Joep
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>> and
>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>> r1465124
>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>
>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>
>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>> noted
>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>
>>>> Cos
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>> in
>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>> into
>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>> doing
>>>> this.
>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>> Also, I
>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>> the
>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>> aware
>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>> source
>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of
>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>> timeout
>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>> should
>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>> that
>>>> I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>> of
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>> days,
>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>> to the
>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we are not cutting a new rc for other reason
+1 on rc1
Thx
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> situation:
>
> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>
> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>
>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>> the vote ends).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>> looks good to me.
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Joep
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>> and
>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>> r1465124
>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>
>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>
>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>> noted
>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>
>>>> Cos
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>> in
>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>> into
>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>> doing
>>>> this.
>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>> Also, I
>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>> the
>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>> aware
>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>> source
>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of
>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>> timeout
>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>> should
>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>> that
>>>> I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>> of
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>> days,
>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>> to the
>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we are not cutting a new rc for other reason
+1 on rc1
Thx
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
> situation:
>
> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>
> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>
>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
>> the vote ends).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>> looks good to me.
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Joep
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>> and
>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>> r1465124
>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>>>>
>>>> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>
>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
>>> noted
>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>
>>>> Cos
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
>>>> in
>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
>>>> into
>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
>>> doing
>>>> this.
>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
>>>> Also, I
>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
>>> the
>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
>>>> aware
>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
>>>> source
>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
>>>> couple of
>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
>>> timeout
>>>>>> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
>>>> should
>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>> that
>>>> I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
>>> of
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
>>>> days,
>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
>>>> to the
>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Alejandro,
I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
situation:
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
Thanks,
Cos
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> the vote ends).
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Thanks for fixing Cos.
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> > looks good to me.
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joep
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > > and
> > > later. It has been committed as
> > > r1465124
> > > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> > >
> > > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> > >
> > > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> > noted
> > > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > > Alejandro,
> > > >
> > > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > > in
> > > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > > into
> > > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> > doing
> > > this.
> > > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > > Also, I
> > > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > > >
> > > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> > the
> > > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > > aware
> > > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > > source
> > > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > > >
> > > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > > couple of
> > > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > > >
> > > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > > >
> > > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> > timeout
> > > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > > >
> > > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > > should
> > > > > be there empty).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> > that
> > > I
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > like to release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> > of
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > > >
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > > Sat,
> > > > > > June
> > > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > > days,
> > > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > > to the
> > > > > > ones
> > > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > > Cos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Alejandro
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Alejandro,
I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
situation:
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
Thanks,
Cos
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> the vote ends).
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Thanks for fixing Cos.
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> > looks good to me.
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joep
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > > and
> > > later. It has been committed as
> > > r1465124
> > > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> > >
> > > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> > >
> > > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> > noted
> > > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > > Alejandro,
> > > >
> > > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > > in
> > > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > > into
> > > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> > doing
> > > this.
> > > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > > Also, I
> > > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > > >
> > > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> > the
> > > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > > aware
> > > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > > source
> > > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > > >
> > > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > > couple of
> > > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > > >
> > > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > > >
> > > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> > timeout
> > > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > > >
> > > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > > should
> > > > > be there empty).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> > that
> > > I
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > like to release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> > of
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > > >
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > > Sat,
> > > > > > June
> > > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > > days,
> > > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > > to the
> > > > > > ones
> > > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > > Cos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Alejandro
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Alejandro,
I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the same
situation:
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think this
is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
Thanks,
Cos
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
> the vote ends).
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Thanks for fixing Cos.
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> > looks good to me.
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joep
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > > and
> > > later. It has been committed as
> > > r1465124
> > > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> > >
> > > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> > >
> > > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> > noted
> > > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > > Alejandro,
> > > >
> > > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > > in
> > > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > > into
> > > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> > doing
> > > this.
> > > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > > Also, I
> > > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > > >
> > > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> > the
> > > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > > aware
> > > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > > source
> > > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > > >
> > > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > > couple of
> > > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > > >
> > > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > > >
> > > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> > timeout
> > > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > > >
> > > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > > should
> > > > > be there empty).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> > that
> > > I
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > like to release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> > of
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > > >
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > > Sat,
> > > > > > June
> > > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > > days,
> > > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > > to the
> > > > > > ones
> > > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > > Cos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Alejandro
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
the vote ends).
Thanks
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> looks good to me.
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joep
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > and
> > later. It has been committed as
> > r1465124
> > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >
> > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >
> > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> noted
> > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > Alejandro,
> > >
> > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > in
> > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > into
> > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> doing
> > this.
> > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > Also, I
> > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > >
> > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> the
> > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > aware
> > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > source
> > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > >
> > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > couple of
> > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > >
> > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > >
> > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > >
> > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> timeout
> > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > >
> > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > >
> > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > should
> > > > be there empty).
> > > >
> > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> that
> > I
> > > > > would
> > > > > like to release.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> of
> > > > > issues
> > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > >
> > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > Sat,
> > > > > June
> > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > days,
> > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > to the
> > > > > ones
> > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > Cos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alejandro
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
the vote ends).
Thanks
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> looks good to me.
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joep
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > and
> > later. It has been committed as
> > r1465124
> > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >
> > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >
> > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> noted
> > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > Alejandro,
> > >
> > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > in
> > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > into
> > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> doing
> > this.
> > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > Also, I
> > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > >
> > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> the
> > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > aware
> > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > source
> > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > >
> > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > couple of
> > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > >
> > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > >
> > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > >
> > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> timeout
> > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > >
> > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > >
> > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > should
> > > > be there empty).
> > > >
> > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> that
> > I
> > > > > would
> > > > > like to release.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> of
> > > > > issues
> > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > >
> > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > Sat,
> > > > > June
> > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > days,
> > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > to the
> > > > > ones
> > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > Cos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alejandro
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
the vote ends).
Thanks
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> looks good to me.
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joep
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > and
> > later. It has been committed as
> > r1465124
> > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >
> > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >
> > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> noted
> > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > Alejandro,
> > >
> > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > in
> > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > into
> > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> doing
> > this.
> > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > Also, I
> > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > >
> > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> the
> > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > aware
> > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > source
> > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > >
> > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > couple of
> > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > >
> > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > >
> > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > >
> > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> timeout
> > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > >
> > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > >
> > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > should
> > > > be there empty).
> > > >
> > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> that
> > I
> > > > > would
> > > > > like to release.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> of
> > > > > issues
> > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > >
> > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > Sat,
> > > > > June
> > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > days,
> > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > to the
> > > > > ones
> > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > Cos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alejandro
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they have
2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the date
the vote ends).
Thanks
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for fixing Cos.
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> looks good to me.
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joep
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> > and
> > later. It has been committed as
> > r1465124
> > The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
> >
> > svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
> >
> > So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have
> noted
> > earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > Alejandro,
> > >
> > > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> > in
> > > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> > into
> > > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember
> doing
> > this.
> > > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> > Also, I
> > > will do JIRA in a moment.
> > >
> > > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for
> the
> > > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> > aware
> > > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> > source
> > > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> > >
> > > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> > couple of
> > > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > > >
> > > > Still, something seems odd.
> > > >
> > > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > > >
> > > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured
> timeout
> > > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > > >
> > > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > > >
> > > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> > should
> > > > be there empty).
> > > >
> > > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
> that
> > I
> > > > > would
> > > > > like to release.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a
> of
> > > > > issues
> > > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > > >
> > > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> > Sat,
> > > > > June
> > > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> > days,
> > > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> > to the
> > > > > ones
> > > > > voted on before in
> > > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > > Cos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alejandro
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by "J. Rottinghuis" <jr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for fixing Cos.
http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
looks good to me.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Joep
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> and
> later. It has been committed as
> r1465124
> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>
> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>
> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have noted
> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>
> Cos
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Alejandro,
> >
> > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> in
> > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> into
> > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing
> this.
> > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> Also, I
> > will do JIRA in a moment.
> >
> > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
> > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> aware
> > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> source
> > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >
> > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> couple of
> > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > >
> > > Still, something seems odd.
> > >
> > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > >
> > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > >
> > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > >
> > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> should
> > > be there empty).
> > >
> > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that
> I
> > > > would
> > > > like to release.
> > > >
> > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > > > issues
> > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > >
> > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> Sat,
> > > > June
> > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > >
> > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> days,
> > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> to the
> > > > ones
> > > > voted on before in
> > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alejandro
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by "J. Rottinghuis" <jr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for fixing Cos.
http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
looks good to me.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Joep
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
> and
> later. It has been committed as
> r1465124
> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
>
> svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>
> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have noted
> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>
> Cos
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Alejandro,
> >
> > thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section
> in
> > YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
> into
> > to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing
> this.
> > Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it.
> Also, I
> > will do JIRA in a moment.
> >
> > Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
> > releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't
> aware
> > about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing
> source
> > code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
> >
> > I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a
> couple of
> > > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> > >
> > > Still, something seems odd.
> > >
> > > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> > >
> > > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> > > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> > >
> > > but I don't see that in the branch.
> > >
> > > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it
> should
> > > be there empty).
> > >
> > > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that
> I
> > > > would
> > > > like to release.
> > > >
> > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > > > issues
> > > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > > >
> > > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on
> Sat,
> > > > June
> > > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > > >
> > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3
> days,
> > > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical
> to the
> > > > ones
> > > > voted on before in
> > > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your voting
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alejandro
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha and
later. It has been committed as
r1465124
The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have noted
earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get into
> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing this.
> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. Also, I
> will do JIRA in a moment.
>
> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't aware
> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing source
> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>
> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> Cos
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >
> > Still, something seems odd.
> >
> > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >
> > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >
> > but I don't see that in the branch.
> >
> > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> > be there empty).
> >
> > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > > would
> > > like to release.
> > >
> > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > > issues
> > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > >
> > > The RC is available at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > >
> > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > > June
> > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > >
> > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > > ones
> > > voted on before in
> > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > >
> > > Thanks for your voting
> > > Cos
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha and
later. It has been committed as
r1465124
The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have noted
earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get into
> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing this.
> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. Also, I
> will do JIRA in a moment.
>
> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't aware
> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing source
> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>
> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> Cos
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >
> > Still, something seems odd.
> >
> > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >
> > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >
> > but I don't see that in the branch.
> >
> > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> > be there empty).
> >
> > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > > would
> > > like to release.
> > >
> > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > > issues
> > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > >
> > > The RC is available at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > >
> > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > > June
> > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > >
> > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > > ones
> > > voted on before in
> > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > >
> > > Thanks for your voting
> > > Cos
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha and
later. It has been committed as
r1465124
The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird commit message:
svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you guys have noted
earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get into
> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing this.
> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. Also, I
> will do JIRA in a moment.
>
> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't aware
> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing source
> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>
> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
> Cos
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> > sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
> >
> > Still, something seems odd.
> >
> > The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
> >
> > HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> > value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
> >
> > but I don't see that in the branch.
> >
> > And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> > be there empty).
> >
> > Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > > would
> > > like to release.
> > >
> > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > > issues
> > > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> > >
> > > The RC is available at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> > >
> > > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > > June
> > > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> > >
> > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > > ones
> > > voted on before in
> > > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> > >
> > > Thanks for your voting
> > > Cos
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Alejandro,
thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get into
to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing this.
Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. Also, I
will do JIRA in a moment.
Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't aware
about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing source
code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> Still, something seems odd.
>
> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>
> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>
> but I don't see that in the branch.
>
> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > would
> > like to release.
> >
> > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > issues
> > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >
> > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > June
> > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >
> > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > ones
> > voted on before in
> > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >
> > Thanks for your voting
> > Cos
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by "J. Rottinghuis" <jr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the hadoop-2.0.5-alpha RC0 Cos!
+1 (non-binding) in principle for a 2.0.5-alpha release.
Similar to Alejandro I see that:
/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-src/hadoop-hdfs-project/README.txt (has 2.0.4 release
date missing):
Release 2.0.5-alpha - UNRELEASED
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
/hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt (misses 2.0.5 section and does not have
date for previous 2.0.4 release set):
Release 2.0.5-alpha (<- Missing section)
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
In addition I do not see the release notes at the top of the tar.gz:
releasenotes.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.HADOOP.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.HDFS.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.MAPREDUCE.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.YARN.2.0.5-alpha.html
I do see the src-tar.gz etc., but not the regular tarball in
http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
Not sure if that warrants a RC1 or not.
Thanks,
Joep
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> Still, something seems odd.
>
> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>
> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>
> but I don't see that in the branch.
>
> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > would
> > like to release.
> >
> > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > issues
> > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >
> > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > June
> > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >
> > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > ones
> > voted on before in
> > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >
> > Thanks for your voting
> > Cos
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by "J. Rottinghuis" <jr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the hadoop-2.0.5-alpha RC0 Cos!
+1 (non-binding) in principle for a 2.0.5-alpha release.
Similar to Alejandro I see that:
/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-src/hadoop-hdfs-project/README.txt (has 2.0.4 release
date missing):
Release 2.0.5-alpha - UNRELEASED
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
/hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt (misses 2.0.5 section and does not have
date for previous 2.0.4 release set):
Release 2.0.5-alpha (<- Missing section)
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
In addition I do not see the release notes at the top of the tar.gz:
releasenotes.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.HADOOP.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.HDFS.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.MAPREDUCE.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.YARN.2.0.5-alpha.html
I do see the src-tar.gz etc., but not the regular tarball in
http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
Not sure if that warrants a RC1 or not.
Thanks,
Joep
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> Still, something seems odd.
>
> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>
> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>
> but I don't see that in the branch.
>
> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > would
> > like to release.
> >
> > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > issues
> > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >
> > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > June
> > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >
> > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > ones
> > voted on before in
> > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >
> > Thanks for your voting
> > Cos
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Alejandro,
thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get into
to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing this.
Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. Also, I
will do JIRA in a moment.
Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't aware
about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing source
code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> Still, something seems odd.
>
> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>
> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>
> but I don't see that in the branch.
>
> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > would
> > like to release.
> >
> > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > issues
> > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >
> > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > June
> > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >
> > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > ones
> > voted on before in
> > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >
> > Thanks for your voting
> > Cos
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by "J. Rottinghuis" <jr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the hadoop-2.0.5-alpha RC0 Cos!
+1 (non-binding) in principle for a 2.0.5-alpha release.
Similar to Alejandro I see that:
/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-src/hadoop-hdfs-project/README.txt (has 2.0.4 release
date missing):
Release 2.0.5-alpha - UNRELEASED
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
/hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt (misses 2.0.5 section and does not have
date for previous 2.0.4 release set):
Release 2.0.5-alpha (<- Missing section)
Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
In addition I do not see the release notes at the top of the tar.gz:
releasenotes.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.HADOOP.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.HDFS.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.MAPREDUCE.2.0.5-alpha.html
releasenotes.YARN.2.0.5-alpha.html
I do see the src-tar.gz etc., but not the regular tarball in
http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
Not sure if that warrants a RC1 or not.
Thanks,
Joep
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> Still, something seems odd.
>
> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>
> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>
> but I don't see that in the branch.
>
> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > would
> > like to release.
> >
> > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > issues
> > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >
> > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > June
> > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >
> > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > ones
> > voted on before in
> > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >
> > Thanks for your voting
> > Cos
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Alejandro,
thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get into
to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively remember doing this.
Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt to reflect it. Also, I
will do JIRA in a moment.
Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed the dates for the
releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file - sorry I wasn't aware
about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are only releasing source
code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>
> Still, something seems odd.
>
> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
>
> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
> value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>
> but I don't see that in the branch.
>
> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> > would
> > like to release.
> >
> > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> > issues
> > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
> >
> > The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> > June
> > 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> > http://s.apache.org/WKD
> >
> > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> > because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> > ones
> > voted on before in
> > http://s.apache.org/2041move
> >
> > Thanks for your voting
> > Cos
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
Still, something seems odd.
The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
but I don't see that in the branch.
And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
be there empty).
Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
Still, something seems odd.
The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
but I don't see that in the branch.
And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
be there empty).
Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Cos.
Sangjin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Cos.
Sangjin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Cos.
Sangjin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
Still, something seems odd.
The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
but I don't see that in the branch.
And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
be there empty).
Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
--
Alejandro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster, run a couple of
sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
Still, something seems odd.
The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under 2.0.5-alpha:
HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores configured timeout
value (Jagane Sundar via cos)
but I don't see that in the branch.
And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
be there empty).
Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
> would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
> issues
> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>
> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org on Sat,
> June
> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
> http://s.apache.org/WKD
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the 3 days,
> because this is just a version name change. The bits are identical to the
> ones
> voted on before in
> http://s.apache.org/2041move
>
> Thanks for your voting
> Cos
>
>
--
Alejandro