You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fineract.apache.org by "Petri Tuomola (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/13 16:36:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (FINERACT-1187) WAR should have fixed file name

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Petri Tuomola resolved FINERACT-1187.
-------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> WAR should have fixed file name
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-1187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1187
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Petri Tuomola
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Something somewhere in 1.4.0 made the built WAR file contain release number information ({{./gradlew bootWAR}} creates {{fineract-provider-release-1.4.0-660-g2ce7ed2.war}}).
> This means that end-users have to rename the WAR file back to {{fineract-provider}} as it used to be when they deploy it to Tomcat, and causes confusion, as seen e.g. on the recent "Finereract Customization" email thread.
> [~aleks] [~ptuomola] I missed when exactly that happened and how (probably it was part of automating the 1.4.0 release work?), and it matters only for historical context - was there a "need" for it, or was it just "nice"? (The same information is of course already available on https://demo.fineract.dev/fineract-provider/actuator/info.)
> How about we revert that to how it used to be?
> PS: The Boot JAR doesn't suffer from this problem, so we can keep that named as is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)