You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com> on 2014/10/31 20:48:27 UTC
Vote for a Apache Ignite Logo
Hi,
I would like to ask everyone who has not voted yet, to vote on Apache
Ignite Logo.
Here are the candidates:
http://99designs.com/logo-design/vote-oc1grs
Thanks,
D.
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Ilya Sterin <is...@gmail.com>.
+1 on this one as well.
On Saturday, November 1, 2014, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Oh no! Engineers voting on a graphic.
>
> +1 on
>
> http://99designs.com/designs/42031464~bc93ed7f99c68fb679cecb60f69997e823946193-original
>
> Clean, coherent, simple.
>
> A bunch of these would do. The 99designs folks did good job.
>
> St.Ack
> P.S. Little Story: In HBase, we did 99 designs. We had 500 submissions.
> After a bunch of time, we narrowed the set to choose from. A bunch of
> folks voted but the spread was too thin -- the votes were all over the
> place (We did PR). No one was really happy with the result that bubbled
> up. The resultant choice was meh. We no longer go by that winner.
> P.P.S. Another little story: In HBase it took us 2 years to settle on a
> motif after loads of folks made proposals, a good few designers made
> submissions, and we went back and forth in an issue that went on and on
> with links out to the net to all sorts of interesting possibilities for
> folks to ruminate on. This process was super painful.
>
> Engineers are bad at graphics. If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some
> reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'. Let Dmitry or whoever paid
> for the 99designs just choose.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Changing the subject to indicate that this is [VOTE] thread.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:48PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to ask everyone who has not voted yet, to vote on Apache
> > > Ignite Logo.
> > >
> > > Here are the candidates:
> > > http://99designs.com/logo-design/vote-oc1grs
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > D.
> >
>
--
Ilya
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 06.11.2014 21:11, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback
> (got over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
Nope, it's not. :)
ASF mailing lists remove binary attachments. Better to commit artwork to
a/the repository and post a link to it in the mail; we'll need it there
for the web site graphics anyway.
-- Brane
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 18.11.2014 20:23, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Sorry, didn't realize that attachments cannot be sent. Here is the link:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/igy001ogydltun8/apache%20ignite_final.pdf?dl=0
Thanks. I hope you intend to commit this original PDF to the (site)
repository, so that no-one has to break their neck trying to find the
original artwork.
It would be great to also have the logo construction metrics and usage
guide in the same place; I assume the designer can provide them, they
should be part of the package.
-- Brane
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
I like it =)
+1
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
<ds...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Sorry, didn't realize that attachments cannot be sent. Here is the link:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/igy001ogydltun8/apache%20ignite_final.pdf?dl=0
>
> D.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@gridgain.com
>> wrote:
>
>> This logo was picked (attached).
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 18.11.2014 07:02, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>> > To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread
>>> can be
>>> > closed?
>>>
>>> And post a link to the logo, please, because I still don't know which
>>> one was picked. :)
>>>
>>> -- Brane
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com>.
Sorry, didn't realize that attachments cannot be sent. Here is the link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/igy001ogydltun8/apache%20ignite_final.pdf?dl=0
D.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@gridgain.com
> wrote:
> This logo was picked (attached).
>
> D.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 18.11.2014 07:02, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>> > To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread
>> can be
>> > closed?
>>
>> And post a link to the logo, please, because I still don't know which
>> one was picked. :)
>>
>> -- Brane
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com>.
This logo was picked (attached).
D.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 18.11.2014 07:02, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread
> can be
> > closed?
>
> And post a link to the logo, please, because I still don't know which
> one was picked. :)
>
> -- Brane
>
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 18.11.2014 07:02, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread can be
> closed?
And post a link to the logo, please, because I still don't know which
one was picked. :)
-- Brane
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread can be
closed?
Cos
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:15PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Dmitriy, please provide the link to winner.
>
>
> --
> Yakov Zhdanov, Director R&D
> *GridGain Systems*
> www.gridgain.com
>
> 2014-11-07 11:13 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com>:
>
> > The votes were casted here, but mostly they were casted on 99designs
> > website (the link was sent out), and then the final version was worked out
> > directly with the designer.
> >
> > It was the version picked by a majority (I, for instance, picked a
> > different one).
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the
> > > dev@
> > > where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything?
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > > Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback
> > (got
> > > > over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
> > > >
> > > > Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked
> > > bad
> > > > on smaller versions of the logo.
> > > >
> > > > D.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament,
> > as
> > > > > Stack
> > > > > has alluded ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> > > > > 2. #560
> > > > > 3. #60
> > > > >
> > > > > Cos
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > > > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > > > > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of
> > > pre-press,
> > > > > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of
> > the
> > > > > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > > > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we
> > do
> > > some
> > > > > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1]
> > (which
> > > is
> > > > > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to
> > > give a
> > > > > > reasonable result.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My choice then would be:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. #200
> > > > > > 2. #135
> > > > > > 3. #560
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Brane
> > > > > >
> > > > > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally
> > the
> > > > > > results
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > > > > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@gridgain.com>.
Dmitriy, please provide the link to winner.
--
Yakov Zhdanov, Director R&D
*GridGain Systems*
www.gridgain.com
2014-11-07 11:13 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com>:
> The votes were casted here, but mostly they were casted on 99designs
> website (the link was sent out), and then the final version was worked out
> directly with the designer.
>
> It was the version picked by a majority (I, for instance, picked a
> different one).
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the
> > dev@
> > where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything?
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback
> (got
> > > over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
> > >
> > > Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked
> > bad
> > > on smaller versions of the logo.
> > >
> > > D.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament,
> as
> > > > Stack
> > > > has alluded ;)
> > > >
> > > > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
> > > >
> > > > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> > > > 2. #560
> > > > 3. #60
> > > >
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > > > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of
> > pre-press,
> > > > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of
> the
> > > > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> > > > >
> > > > > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we
> do
> > some
> > > > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1]
> (which
> > is
> > > > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to
> > give a
> > > > > reasonable result.
> > > > >
> > > > > My choice then would be:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. #200
> > > > > 2. #135
> > > > > 3. #560
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Brane
> > > > >
> > > > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally
> the
> > > > > results
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > > > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
> > > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com>.
The votes were casted here, but mostly they were casted on 99designs
website (the link was sent out), and then the final version was worked out
directly with the designer.
It was the version picked by a majority (I, for instance, picked a
different one).
D.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the
> dev@
> where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything?
>
> Cos
>
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback (got
> > over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
> >
> > Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked
> bad
> > on smaller versions of the logo.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as
> > > Stack
> > > has alluded ;)
> > >
> > > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
> > >
> > > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> > > 2. #560
> > > 3. #60
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> > > >
> > > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of
> pre-press,
> > > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the
> > > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> > > >
> > > > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do
> some
> > > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> > > >
> > > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which
> is
> > > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to
> give a
> > > > reasonable result.
> > > >
> > > > My choice then would be:
> > > >
> > > > 1. #200
> > > > 2. #135
> > > > 3. #560
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Brane
> > > >
> > > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the
> > > > results
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
> > >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the dev@
where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything?
Cos
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback (got
> over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
>
> Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked bad
> on smaller versions of the logo.
>
> D.
>
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as
> > Stack
> > has alluded ;)
> >
> > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
> >
> > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> > 2. #560
> > 3. #60
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> > >
> > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of pre-press,
> > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the
> > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> > >
> > > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some
> > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> > >
> > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which is
> > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to give a
> > > reasonable result.
> > >
> > > My choice then would be:
> > >
> > > 1. #200
> > > 2. #135
> > > 3. #560
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Brane
> > >
> > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the
> > > results
> > >
> > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
> >
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@gridgain.com>.
Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback (got
over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked bad
on smaller versions of the logo.
D.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as
> Stack
> has alluded ;)
>
> If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
>
> 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> 2. #560
> 3. #60
>
> Cos
>
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> >
> > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of pre-press,
> > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the
> > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> >
> > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some
> > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> >
> > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which is
> > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to give a
> > reasonable result.
> >
> > My choice then would be:
> >
> > 1. #200
> > 2. #135
> > 3. #560
> >
> >
> > -- Brane
> >
> > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the
> > results
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as Stack
has alluded ;)
If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
2. #560
3. #60
Cos
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > Engineers are bad at graphics.
>
> Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of pre-press,
> so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the
> proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
>
> > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some
> > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
>
> Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which is
> used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to give a
> reasonable result.
>
> My choice then would be:
>
> 1. #200
> 2. #135
> 3. #560
>
>
> -- Brane
>
> P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the
> results
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> Engineers are bad at graphics.
Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of pre-press,
so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the
proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some
> reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which is
used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to give a
reasonable result.
My choice then would be:
1. #200
2. #135
3. #560
-- Brane
P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the
results
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
[2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Oh no! Engineers voting on a graphic.
+1 on
http://99designs.com/designs/42031464~bc93ed7f99c68fb679cecb60f69997e823946193-original
Clean, coherent, simple.
A bunch of these would do. The 99designs folks did good job.
St.Ack
P.S. Little Story: In HBase, we did 99 designs. We had 500 submissions.
After a bunch of time, we narrowed the set to choose from. A bunch of
folks voted but the spread was too thin -- the votes were all over the
place (We did PR). No one was really happy with the result that bubbled
up. The resultant choice was meh. We no longer go by that winner.
P.P.S. Another little story: In HBase it took us 2 years to settle on a
motif after loads of folks made proposals, a good few designers made
submissions, and we went back and forth in an issue that went on and on
with links out to the net to all sorts of interesting possibilities for
folks to ruminate on. This process was super painful.
Engineers are bad at graphics. If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some
reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'. Let Dmitry or whoever paid
for the 99designs just choose.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Changing the subject to indicate that this is [VOTE] thread.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:48PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to ask everyone who has not voted yet, to vote on Apache
> > Ignite Logo.
> >
> > Here are the candidates:
> > http://99designs.com/logo-design/vote-oc1grs
> >
> > Thanks,
> > D.
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@gridgain.com>.
http://99designs.com/attachments/47767139~8a86b9b92bdf7340097139ac15d90109a06a5be7/deprecated-preview-largecrop
This one.
--
Yakov Zhdanov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
On Oct 31, 2014 10:56 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Changing the subject to indicate that this is [VOTE] thread.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:48PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to ask everyone who has not voted yet, to vote on Apache
> > Ignite Logo.
> >
> > Here are the candidates:
> > http://99designs.com/logo-design/vote-oc1grs
> >
> > Thanks,
> > D.
>
Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Changing the subject to indicate that this is [VOTE] thread.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:48PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask everyone who has not voted yet, to vote on Apache
> Ignite Logo.
>
> Here are the candidates:
> http://99designs.com/logo-design/vote-oc1grs
>
> Thanks,
> D.