You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ruleqa@spamassassin.apache.org by Bill Cole <sa...@billmail.scconsult.com> on 2026/06/30 20:51:27 UTC
Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
--
Bill Cole
bill@scconsult.com or billcole@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Please keep discussion mailing list replies *on-list*
Not Currently Available For Hire
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Mon, 6 Jul 2026, Tobi wrote:
> John
>
> sorry was my fault :-) I changed the time when the server is powered-up
> but forgot to adjust the time in cron. So the job in cron was before
> the time the system was powered-up, therefore never run. As the system
> is powered-down by the plugin-timer that started the server, the job
> was never triggered.
> Now added the job to a systemd timer with OnBootSec set to 20min after
> power-up to avoid such "features" in future :-)
>
> Additionally I manually started the job once, should be finished around
> 12 o'clock (CET)
Still not seeing your submissions.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 days until the 57th anniversary of Apollo 11 landing on the Moon
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by Tobi <ja...@gmx.ch>.
John
sorry was my fault :-) I changed the time when the server is powered-up
but forgot to adjust the time in cron. So the job in cron was before
the time the system was powered-up, therefore never run. As the system
is powered-down by the plugin-timer that started the server, the job
was never triggered.
Now added the job to a systemd timer with OnBootSec set to 20min after
power-up to avoid such "features" in future :-)
Additionally I manually started the job once, should be finished around
12 o'clock (CET)
Cheers
tobi
On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 09:55 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026, Tobi wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > I see that my corpus is not part of the masscheck atm. My server
> > claims
> > that masscheck passed every evening/night (starting at 21:00 CET).
>
> Is it also reporting the success/failure of the upload of the
> results?
>
> > My corpus should be by far big enough to give the missing 10k ;-)
>
> Fingers crossed.
>
> > Cheers
> >
> > tobi
>
> > On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 08:05 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2026, Bill Cole wrote:
> > >
> > > > But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
> > > >
> > > > Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
> > >
> > > I'm uploading successfully too.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately we're about 10k short of the minimum spam
> > > threshold, so
> > > masscheck is NOT advancing the SVN commit - we've been stuck on
> > > 1935146
> > > since the mitigation.
> > >
> > > This seems like an error in the masscheck scripting; I would
> > > assume the
> > > snapshot should advance even on starvation, but if we can get
> > > some more
> > > spam from _somewhere_ we should be able to get past it.
> > >
> >
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026, Tobi wrote:
> John,
>
> I see that my corpus is not part of the masscheck atm. My server claims
> that masscheck passed every evening/night (starting at 21:00 CET).
Is it also reporting the success/failure of the upload of the results?
> My corpus should be by far big enough to give the missing 10k ;-)
Fingers crossed.
> Cheers
>
> tobi
> On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 08:05 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2026, Bill Cole wrote:
>>
>>> But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
>>>
>>> Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
>>
>> I'm uploading successfully too.
>>
>> Unfortunately we're about 10k short of the minimum spam threshold, so
>> masscheck is NOT advancing the SVN commit - we've been stuck on 1935146
>> since the mitigation.
>>
>> This seems like an error in the masscheck scripting; I would assume the
>> snapshot should advance even on starvation, but if we can get some more
>> spam from _somewhere_ we should be able to get past it.
>>
>
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The world has enough Mouse Clicking System Engineers.
-- Dave Pooser
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 days until the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by Tobi <ja...@gmx.ch>.
John,
I see that my corpus is not part of the masscheck atm. My server claims
that masscheck passed every evening/night (starting at 21:00 CET). My
corpus should be by far big enough to give the missing 10k ;-)
Cheers
tobi
On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 08:05 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2026, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> > But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
> >
> > Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
>
> I'm uploading successfully too.
>
> Unfortunately we're about 10k short of the minimum spam threshold, so
> masscheck is NOT advancing the SVN commit - we've been stuck on
> 1935146
> since the mitigation.
>
> This seems like an error in the masscheck scripting; I would assume
> the
> snapshot should advance even on starvation, but if we can get some
> more
> spam from _somewhere_ we should be able to get past it.
>
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Tue, 30 Jun 2026, Bill Cole wrote:
> But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
>
> Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
I'm uploading successfully too.
Unfortunately we're about 10k short of the minimum spam threshold, so
masscheck is NOT advancing the SVN commit - we've been stuck on 1935146
since the mitigation.
This seems like an error in the masscheck scripting; I would assume the
snapshot should advance even on starvation, but if we can get some more
spam from _somewhere_ we should be able to get past it.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you a mildly tech-literate politico horrified by the level of
ignorance demonstrated by lawmakers gearing up to regulate online
technology they don't even begin to grasp? Cool. Now you have a
tiny glimpse into a day in the life of a gun owner. -- Sean Davis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 days until the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by Marcin Mirosław <ma...@mejor.pl>.
W dniu 2026-06-30 22:51, Bill Cole napisał(a):
> But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
>
> Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
I just uploaded data. Works for me, great!
Marcin
Re: Rule QA VM is mostly OK now…
Posted by Tobi <ja...@gmx.ch>.
Bill
looks better to me as at least "20260612-r1935146-n" shows my corpus
again :-) It hadn't been shown since somewhen beginning June.
Cheers
tobi
On Tue, 2026-06-30 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> But it seems like it's not dealing with the long period choked.
>
> Is everyone able to upload or did I break something?
>