You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by "Kimahriman (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/06/24 14:59:47 UTC

[PR] [SPARK-37467][SQL] Consolidate subexpression elimination code for whole stage and non-whole stage [spark]

Kimahriman opened a new pull request, #51269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51269

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first for naming configurations in
        'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   This PR consolidates the code paths for subexpression elimination in whole stage and non-whole stage codegen. Whole stage codegen seemed to be mostly a superset of the non-whole stage subexpression elimination, just with whole stage not using the codegen context to track subexpressions.
   
   This cleans things up by making non-whole stage use the same stateless approach as whole-stage so there is a single code path for all subexpression elimination, simplifying future improvements.
   
   It shouldn't result in any functionality changes, but there are slight differences in the generated code as a result of this:
   - Subexpressions in whole stage always use mutable state for results instead of inlining variables to support code splitting in non-whole stage
   - Non-whole stage now supports the same inlining subexpressions if small enough as whole stage codegen
   
   I'm not a JVM expert but I don't expect a mutable state to cause a performance regression over an inlined variable, especially since they are used in the split case anyway, and this may make future code splitting improvements simpler.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   Currently, there are different code paths to handle subexpression elimination in whole stage and non-whole stage codegen. This makes it harder to add new capabilities to subexpression elimination having to deal with independent code paths.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as new features, bug fixes, or other behavior changes. Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
   
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   No, just slight changes in generated code.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   Existing unit tests.
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


Re: [PR] [SPARK-37467][SQL] Consolidate subexpression elimination code for whole stage and non-whole stage [spark]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #51269: [SPARK-37467][SQL] Consolidate subexpression elimination code for whole stage and non-whole stage
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51269


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


Re: [PR] [SPARK-37467][SQL] Consolidate subexpression elimination code for whole stage and non-whole stage [spark]

Posted by "Kimahriman (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
Kimahriman commented on PR #51269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51269#issuecomment-3000903156

   This is a redo of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34727, except it goes the route of making non-whole stage stateless, instead of making whole-stage stateful


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


Re: [PR] [SPARK-37467][SQL] Consolidate subexpression elimination code for whole stage and non-whole stage [spark]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #51269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51269#issuecomment-3367636473

   We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
   If you'd like to revive this PR, please reopen it and ask a committer to remove the Stale tag!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org