You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by Javen O'Neal <on...@apache.org> on 2017/02/01 01:19:13 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Should I wait for the results of common crawl or other regression testing
before proceeding with the release?
On Jan 30, 2017 16:19, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual suspects,
> as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry
>
> Thank you Javen for taking care of this.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
Thank you, Javen!
Thank you, Dominik!
-----Original Message-----
From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:onealj@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 3:02 PM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Dominik,
The trunk is open for commits. I have built and deployed 3.16-beta2. The only thing left is to send out an announcement email.
On Feb 2, 2017 11:45, "Dominik Stadler" <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems to have been caused by r1747942, I have a local change
> pending the beta2-release which reverts some parts of this change so
> that this works as before again.
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Allison, Timothy B.
> <ta...@mitre.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Dominik!
> >
> > Looks like there is one other new one -- very rare -- that isn't
> > caused
> by
> > the embedded extractor or the WMF component.
> >
> > java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherComplexProperty.resizeComplexData(
> > EscherComplexProperty.java:102)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherArrayProperty.setArrayData(
> > EscherArrayProperty.java:169)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherPropertyFactory.createProperties(
> > EscherPropertyFactory.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.AbstractEscherOptRecord.fillFields(
> > AbstractEscherOptRecord.java:55)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.fillEscherRecords(
> > EscherRecordHolder.java:56)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.(
> > EscherRecordHolder.java:45)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:275)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:157)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:145)
> > at o.a.p.stress.HWPFFileHandler.handleFile(HWPFFileHandler.
> > java:32)
> > at org.dstadler.commoncrawl.FileHandlingRunnable.run(
> > FileHandlingRunnable.java:64)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$
> RunnableAdapter.call(
> > Executors.java:514)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(
> > FutureTask.java:264)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.
> > runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$
> > Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
> > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by Javen O'Neal <on...@apache.org>.
Dominik,
The trunk is open for commits. I have built and deployed 3.16-beta2. The
only thing left is to send out an announcement email.
On Feb 2, 2017 11:45, "Dominik Stadler" <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems to have been caused by r1747942, I have a local change pending
> the beta2-release which reverts some parts of this change so that this
> works as before again.
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Dominik!
> >
> > Looks like there is one other new one -- very rare -- that isn't caused
> by
> > the embedded extractor or the WMF component.
> >
> > java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherComplexProperty.resizeComplexData(
> > EscherComplexProperty.java:102)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherArrayProperty.setArrayData(
> > EscherArrayProperty.java:169)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherPropertyFactory.createProperties(
> > EscherPropertyFactory.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.AbstractEscherOptRecord.fillFields(
> > AbstractEscherOptRecord.java:55)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> > EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.fillEscherRecords(
> > EscherRecordHolder.java:56)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.(
> > EscherRecordHolder.java:45)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:275)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:157)
> > at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:145)
> > at o.a.p.stress.HWPFFileHandler.handleFile(HWPFFileHandler.
> > java:32)
> > at org.dstadler.commoncrawl.FileHandlingRunnable.run(
> > FileHandlingRunnable.java:64)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$
> RunnableAdapter.call(
> > Executors.java:514)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(
> > FutureTask.java:264)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.
> > runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$
> > Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
> > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
this seems to have been caused by r1747942, I have a local change pending
the beta2-release which reverts some parts of this change so that this
works as before again.
Dominik.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org>
wrote:
> Thank you, Dominik!
>
> Looks like there is one other new one -- very rare -- that isn't caused by
> the embedded extractor or the WMF component.
>
> java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherComplexProperty.resizeComplexData(
> EscherComplexProperty.java:102)
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherArrayProperty.setArrayData(
> EscherArrayProperty.java:169)
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherPropertyFactory.createProperties(
> EscherPropertyFactory.java:81)
> at o.a.p.ddf.AbstractEscherOptRecord.fillFields(
> AbstractEscherOptRecord.java:55)
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(
> EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
> at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.fillEscherRecords(
> EscherRecordHolder.java:56)
> at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.(
> EscherRecordHolder.java:45)
> at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:275)
> at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:157)
> at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:145)
> at o.a.p.stress.HWPFFileHandler.handleFile(HWPFFileHandler.
> java:32)
> at org.dstadler.commoncrawl.FileHandlingRunnable.run(
> FileHandlingRunnable.java:64)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(
> Executors.java:514)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(
> FutureTask.java:264)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.
> runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$
> Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
Thank you, Dominik!
Looks like there is one other new one -- very rare -- that isn't caused by the embedded extractor or the WMF component.
java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherComplexProperty.resizeComplexData(EscherComplexProperty.java:102)
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherArrayProperty.setArrayData(EscherArrayProperty.java:169)
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherPropertyFactory.createProperties(EscherPropertyFactory.java:81)
at o.a.p.ddf.AbstractEscherOptRecord.fillFields(AbstractEscherOptRecord.java:55)
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
at o.a.p.ddf.EscherContainerRecord.fillFields(EscherContainerRecord.java:81)
at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.fillEscherRecords(EscherRecordHolder.java:56)
at o.a.p.hwpf.model.EscherRecordHolder.(EscherRecordHolder.java:45)
at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:275)
at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:157)
at o.a.p.hwpf.HWPFDocument.(HWPFDocument.java:145)
at o.a.p.stress.HWPFFileHandler.handleFile(HWPFFileHandler.java:32)
at org.dstadler.commoncrawl.FileHandlingRunnable.run(FileHandlingRunnable.java:64)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:514)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1161)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
results from the mass-testing are in, see
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/ for the comparison
between 3.15 and 3.16-beta2, a few newly introduced exceptions, almost all
related to the new EmbeddedExtractor and one exception in HwmfGraphics,
both areas where we added new functionality as far as I remember.
Full results are available at
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/
Dominik.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org>
wrote:
> > had some trouble with JDK crashes in Jpeg handling code
>
> Whoa...
>
> Thank you, Dominik! And, thank you, Javen!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stadler@gmx.at]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 12:27 AM
> To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
>
> My testing is still running, had some trouble with JDK crashes in Jpeg
> handling code, but as you said it's just a beta.
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Feb 1, 2017 03:11, "Javen O'Neal" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Alright. Just a beta. I'll release it in a few hours.
> >
> > On Jan 31, 2017 17:49, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
> >
> > Argh...sorry, no time this go around...
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:onealj@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 8:19 PM
> > To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
> >
> > Should I wait for the results of common crawl or other regression
> > testing before proceeding with the release?
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2017 16:19, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 from me
> > >
> > > I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual
> > > suspects, as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry
> > >
> > > Thank you Javen for taking care of this.
> > >
> > > Andi
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
> had some trouble with JDK crashes in Jpeg handling code
Whoa...
Thank you, Dominik! And, thank you, Javen!
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stadler@gmx.at]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 12:27 AM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
My testing is still running, had some trouble with JDK crashes in Jpeg handling code, but as you said it's just a beta.
Dominik.
On Feb 1, 2017 03:11, "Javen O'Neal" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alright. Just a beta. I'll release it in a few hours.
>
> On Jan 31, 2017 17:49, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> Argh...sorry, no time this go around...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:onealj@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 8:19 PM
> To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
>
> Should I wait for the results of common crawl or other regression
> testing before proceeding with the release?
>
> On Jan 30, 2017 16:19, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual
> > suspects, as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry
> >
> > Thank you Javen for taking care of this.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
My testing is still running, had some trouble with JDK crashes in Jpeg
handling code, but as you said it's just a beta.
Dominik.
On Feb 1, 2017 03:11, "Javen O'Neal" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alright. Just a beta. I'll release it in a few hours.
>
> On Jan 31, 2017 17:49, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> Argh...sorry, no time this go around...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:onealj@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 8:19 PM
> To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
>
> Should I wait for the results of common crawl or other regression testing
> before proceeding with the release?
>
> On Jan 30, 2017 16:19, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual
> > suspects, as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry
> >
> > Thank you Javen for taking care of this.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by Javen O'Neal <ja...@gmail.com>.
Alright. Just a beta. I'll release it in a few hours.
On Jan 31, 2017 17:49, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
Argh...sorry, no time this go around...
-----Original Message-----
From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:onealj@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 8:19 PM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Should I wait for the results of common crawl or other regression testing
before proceeding with the release?
On Jan 30, 2017 16:19, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual
> suspects, as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry
>
> Thank you Javen for taking care of this.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
Argh...sorry, no time this go around...
-----Original Message-----
From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:onealj@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 8:19 PM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)
Should I wait for the results of common crawl or other regression testing before proceeding with the release?
On Jan 30, 2017 16:19, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual
> suspects, as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry
>
> Thank you Javen for taking care of this.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>