You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by "szehon-ho (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/05/26 18:44:16 UTC
[GitHub] [iceberg] szehon-ho commented on a diff in pull request #7713: Spark 3.3,3.4: Add back log making it clearer when we are not pushing down filters
szehon-ho commented on code in PR #7713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7713#discussion_r1207194184
##########
spark/v3.4/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/SparkScanBuilder.java:
##########
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ public Filter[] pushFilters(Filter[] filters) {
}
} catch (Exception e) {
- LOG.warn("Failed to check if {} can be pushed down: {}", filter, e.getMessage());
Review Comment:
Yea let me check this, i thought initially in those cases that we fail to bind, and get an exception.
Hence thought we should not log the stack, as that is a "normal" case.
I think we had decided it was a bit polluting , in some discussion here: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5254#issuecomment-1183804207 , but if it only for abnormal case , I agree we should have a stack.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org