You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by "AlocJose (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/05/17 11:44:12 UTC
[GitHub] [jmeter] AlocJose opened a new issue, #5919: s390x CI failure
AlocJose opened a new issue, #5919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/issues/5919
### Expected behavior
CI should pass
### Actual behavior
CI job failure observed on below task
Task :src:protocol:bolt:test FAILED
Details:
```
FAILURE 0.4sec, org.apache.jmeter.protocol.bolt.sampler.BoltSamplerSpec > should display results if asked
Condition not satisfied:
response.getTime() > 0
| | |
| 0 false
org.apache.jmeter.samplers.SampleResult@485caa8f
at org.apache.jmeter.protocol.bolt.sampler.BoltSamplerSpec.should display results if asked(BoltSamplerSpec.groovy:102)
FAILURE 2.9sec, 7 completed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, org.apache.jmeter.protocol.bolt.sampler.BoltSamplerSpec
0.3sec, 1 completed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, org.apache.jmeter.resources.ResourceKeyUsageTestBolt
FAILURE 6.5sec, 8 completed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, Gradle Test Run :src:protocol:bolt:test
8 tests completed, 1 failed
```
This failure is observed intermittently.
### Steps to reproduce the problem
Execute CI job.
### JMeter Version
master
### Java Version
_No response_
### OS Version
_No response_
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jmeter] vlsi closed issue #5919: s390x CI failure: BoltSamplerSpec > should display results if asked fails at response.getTime()
Posted by "vlsi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
vlsi closed issue #5919: s390x CI failure: BoltSamplerSpec > should display results if asked fails at response.getTime()
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/issues/5919
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jmeter] AlocJose commented on issue #5919: s390x CI failure
Posted by "AlocJose (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
AlocJose commented on issue #5919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/issues/5919#issuecomment-1551248424
We tried the CI steps locally but couldn't observe any failure. Could you please share the node configurations which are used for the CI job?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jmeter] vlsi commented on issue #5919: s390x CI failure
Posted by "vlsi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
vlsi commented on issue #5919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/issues/5919#issuecomment-1551268564
Thanks for the analysis.
Frankly speaking, I do not think the failure is specific to s390x.
The test expects "sampler duration" to exceed 0ms.
I think it is a wrong assumption and adds no value.
I think the response was blazing fast (which might be caused by s390x being too fast), so `response.getTime()` turned out to be `0`.
We probably need to remove that check or rework it somehow to ensure it returns non-negative results.
Do you think you could create such a PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org