You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2021/08/25 11:45:11 UTC

[Bug 65518] New: ProxyWebsocketIdleTimeout backport to 2.4?

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518

            Bug ID: 65518
           Summary: ProxyWebsocketIdleTimeout backport to 2.4?
           Product: Apache httpd-2
           Version: 2.4.48
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: mod_proxy_wstunnel
          Assignee: bugs@httpd.apache.org
          Reporter: a.abfalterer@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

Hi!

We have patched Apache 2.4 in our product so that it supports the
ProxyWebsocketIdleTimeout functionality from trunk. However, with changes in
mod_proxy* source files the patch often has to be aligned accordingly.

We'd highly appreciate the backport as the functionality brings added value to
Apache in regard to resources usage of WebSocket connections.

Cheers, Armin

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


[Bug 65518] ProxyWebsocketIdleTimeout backport to 2.4?

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518

--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> ---
mod_proxy_wstunnel is deprecated. mod_proxy_http should be used instead. Just
configure a long timeout value for the particular worker in this case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


[Bug 65518] ProxyWebsocketIdleTimeout backport to 2.4?

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518

Marc Stern <ma...@approach.be> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marc.stern@approach.be

--- Comment #1 from Marc Stern <ma...@approach.be> ---
This renders web sockets totally unusable in a production environment.
Reloading the service leads to a crash after some time (see
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518).
Can we raise the piority of this request? It's really a "blocker" issue as you
cannot use a normal prod environment (crash on logrotate, etc.).
Thanks a lot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org