You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> on 2023/02/06 11:59:54 UTC
Jakarta EE 10 status
Hi all,
As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched to TomEE
10 actively.
For TomEE, here is the branch
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big now
because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
Jakarta EE API has been updated
https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story short, it builds
and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining failures
are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on the code
base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it still
requires some work to pass the TCK
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some discussions
regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how to
implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Thanks for the Jenkins build. I was using the parametrized one Richard
created but it's definitely easier with a dedicated build.
I looked at both Jenkins and TCK, and it looks not too bad considering the
amount of changes applied both to TomEE and third party libraries +
dependencies management.
I'll keep working to bring the build as close as possible to a green state?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 1:16 AM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 8, 2023, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 8, 2023, at 1:16 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
> >>
> >> I just saw that branch. The idea I had of not merging to main was so
> we could first get test coverage established and then start doing small
> changes, bit by bit, so we can avoid pushing a big set of changes that
> result in a perpetually broken build.
> >>
> >> I don’t really see how we can ever merge #1005 and not have that exact
> outcome.
> >>
> >> How do we see the changes in #1005 reaching main? If there are test
> failures, who fixes them since each person's individual PR is now closed
> and they consider their work done? How would we even know whose changes
> broke what?
> >
> > I’ve created a Jenkins job for PR 1005 that’s a copy of our main job:
> >
> > - https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pr-1005/1/
>
> This build is actually looking pretty great so far.
>
> > I’m going to also kick off a Jakarta EE 9.1 TCK run against that branch
> to see if there are regressions.
>
> Started:
>
> - https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1675901379257
>
> Fingers crossed.
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Feb 8, 2023, at 4:15 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 8, 2023, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2023, at 1:16 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
>>>
>>> I just saw that branch. The idea I had of not merging to main was so we could first get test coverage established and then start doing small changes, bit by bit, so we can avoid pushing a big set of changes that result in a perpetually broken build.
>>>
>>> I don’t really see how we can ever merge #1005 and not have that exact outcome.
>>>
>>> How do we see the changes in #1005 reaching main? If there are test failures, who fixes them since each person's individual PR is now closed and they consider their work done? How would we even know whose changes broke what?
>>
>> I’ve created a Jenkins job for PR 1005 that’s a copy of our main job:
>>
>> - https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pr-1005/1/
>
> This build is actually looking pretty great so far.
>
>> I’m going to also kick off a Jakarta EE 9.1 TCK run against that branch to see if there are regressions.
>
> Started:
>
> - https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1675901379257
>
> Fingers crossed.
5th time’s the charm :)
- https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1675905457060
Still 78% of the tests to run, but looking good so far.
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Feb 8, 2023, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 8, 2023, at 1:16 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
>>
>> I just saw that branch. The idea I had of not merging to main was so we could first get test coverage established and then start doing small changes, bit by bit, so we can avoid pushing a big set of changes that result in a perpetually broken build.
>>
>> I don’t really see how we can ever merge #1005 and not have that exact outcome.
>>
>> How do we see the changes in #1005 reaching main? If there are test failures, who fixes them since each person's individual PR is now closed and they consider their work done? How would we even know whose changes broke what?
>
> I’ve created a Jenkins job for PR 1005 that’s a copy of our main job:
>
> - https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pr-1005/1/
This build is actually looking pretty great so far.
> I’m going to also kick off a Jakarta EE 9.1 TCK run against that branch to see if there are regressions.
Started:
- https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1675901379257
Fingers crossed.
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Feb 8, 2023, at 1:16 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
>
> I just saw that branch. The idea I had of not merging to main was so we could first get test coverage established and then start doing small changes, bit by bit, so we can avoid pushing a big set of changes that result in a perpetually broken build.
>
> I don’t really see how we can ever merge #1005 and not have that exact outcome.
>
> How do we see the changes in #1005 reaching main? If there are test failures, who fixes them since each person's individual PR is now closed and they consider their work done? How would we even know whose changes broke what?
I’ve created a Jenkins job for PR 1005 that’s a copy of our main job:
- https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pr-1005/1/
I’m going to also kick off a Jakarta EE 9.1 TCK run against that branch to see if there are regressions.
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
I understand what you meant. At least the "let's get EE 10 tests to run
with TomEE 9 and then start upgrading". This is why I reverted some
changes.
At the same time, while you were working on it, I started doing a list of
everything and trying to determine an order to avoid wait times and favor
parallelism. This is why I started on APIs, Geronimo, BVal, and whatever
dependencies we have.
But I've been building every day multiple times and running parts of the
server tests many times a day. So I'm pretty confident. I used the approach
of running the tests and then doing changes and running again to see what
broke and what needs to be fixed.
Of course the PR is growing and will probably be hard to review, but I'm
pretty confident we can get it stable. If not, then at least APIs and
libraries are already well advanced and I'm sure we can use that big branch
to split and push small changes to main if we don't want to merge it all
together.
Sorry if it was not the way you were seeing things.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:17 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> > Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
>
> I just saw that branch. The idea I had of not merging to main was so we
> could first get test coverage established and then start doing small
> changes, bit by bit, so we can avoid pushing a big set of changes that
> result in a perpetually broken build.
>
> I don’t really see how we can ever merge #1005 and not have that exact
> outcome.
>
> How do we see the changes in #1005 reaching main? If there are test
> failures, who fixes them since each person's individual PR is now closed
> and they consider their work done? How would we even know whose changes
> broke what?
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
I just saw that branch. The idea I had of not merging to main was so we could first get test coverage established and then start doing small changes, bit by bit, so we can avoid pushing a big set of changes that result in a perpetually broken build.
I don’t really see how we can ever merge #1005 and not have that exact outcome.
How do we see the changes in #1005 reaching main? If there are test failures, who fixes them since each person's individual PR is now closed and they consider their work done? How would we even know whose changes broke what?
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Jon did the merge into our Jakarta branch, so we can close the PR now
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:33 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:
> let's merge it into the branch
> awesome, I'll get that in for you. Thank you
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:32 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Already created a PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1019
>>
>> just the samples are using the old JSF managed beans, tomee-myfaces and
>> other modules compiles fine
>>
>> Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 16:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>>
>> > I looked at the new RC4 and it looks like a big refactoring? So moving
>> to
>> > RC4 requires some thoughts.
>> > For instance, the APIs changed and therefore tomee-myfaces does not
>> compile
>> > anymore after upgrading. I'm wondering if this is even required now.
>> >
>> > I think Romain did most of the integration at that time but I haven't
>> spent
>> > much time on it quite yet. If you have a few minutes, the module is
>> tiny,
>> > maybe you can give your thoughts and some guidance and I'm happy to help
>> > refactor or just remove the module and see where we are and what's
>> needed
>> > as opposed to migrating something we don't know about.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Thomas Andraschko <
>> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Mojarra is final, in MyFaces we have already RC4 which is close to
>> final.
>> > >
>> > > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > That's awesome. Is there any snapshot already?
>> > > > I believe this is not final yet?
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces
>> are
>> > > > ready
>> > > > > actually
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> > > > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately
>> switched
>> > to
>> > > > > TomEE
>> > > > > > 10 actively.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For TomEE, here is the branch
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly
>> big
>> > now
>> > > > > > because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Jakarta EE API has been updated
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story
>> short,
>> > it
>> > > > > > builds
>> > > > > > and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The
>> remaining
>> > > > > failures
>> > > > > > are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work
>> on
>> > the
>> > > > > code
>> > > > > > base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it
>> > still
>> > > > > > requires some work to pass the TCK
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some
>> > > > > discussions
>> > > > > > regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out
>> how
>> > to
>> > > > > > implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
let's merge it into the branch
awesome, I'll get that in for you. Thank you
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:32 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Already created a PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1019
>
> just the samples are using the old JSF managed beans, tomee-myfaces and
> other modules compiles fine
>
> Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 16:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>
> > I looked at the new RC4 and it looks like a big refactoring? So moving to
> > RC4 requires some thoughts.
> > For instance, the APIs changed and therefore tomee-myfaces does not
> compile
> > anymore after upgrading. I'm wondering if this is even required now.
> >
> > I think Romain did most of the integration at that time but I haven't
> spent
> > much time on it quite yet. If you have a few minutes, the module is tiny,
> > maybe you can give your thoughts and some guidance and I'm happy to help
> > refactor or just remove the module and see where we are and what's needed
> > as opposed to migrating something we don't know about.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Mojarra is final, in MyFaces we have already RC4 which is close to
> final.
> > >
> > > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> > >
> > > > That's awesome. Is there any snapshot already?
> > > > I believe this is not final yet?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces
> are
> > > > ready
> > > > > actually
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately
> switched
> > to
> > > > > TomEE
> > > > > > 10 actively.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For TomEE, here is the branch
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big
> > now
> > > > > > because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jakarta EE API has been updated
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story
> short,
> > it
> > > > > > builds
> > > > > > and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining
> > > > > failures
> > > > > > are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on
> > the
> > > > > code
> > > > > > base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it
> > still
> > > > > > requires some work to pass the TCK
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some
> > > > > discussions
> > > > > > regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how
> > to
> > > > > > implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Already created a PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1019
just the samples are using the old JSF managed beans, tomee-myfaces and
other modules compiles fine
Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 16:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> I looked at the new RC4 and it looks like a big refactoring? So moving to
> RC4 requires some thoughts.
> For instance, the APIs changed and therefore tomee-myfaces does not compile
> anymore after upgrading. I'm wondering if this is even required now.
>
> I think Romain did most of the integration at that time but I haven't spent
> much time on it quite yet. If you have a few minutes, the module is tiny,
> maybe you can give your thoughts and some guidance and I'm happy to help
> refactor or just remove the module and see where we are and what's needed
> as opposed to migrating something we don't know about.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mojarra is final, in MyFaces we have already RC4 which is close to final.
> >
> > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > > That's awesome. Is there any snapshot already?
> > > I believe this is not final yet?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are
> > > ready
> > > > actually
> > > >
> > > > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched
> to
> > > > TomEE
> > > > > 10 actively.
> > > > >
> > > > > For TomEE, here is the branch
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big
> now
> > > > > because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jakarta EE API has been updated
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story short,
> it
> > > > > builds
> > > > > and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining
> > > > failures
> > > > > are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
> > > > >
> > > > > For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on
> the
> > > > code
> > > > > base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it
> still
> > > > > requires some work to pass the TCK
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some
> > > > discussions
> > > > > regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how
> to
> > > > > implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
> > > > >
> > > > > And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
I looked at the new RC4 and it looks like a big refactoring? So moving to
RC4 requires some thoughts.
For instance, the APIs changed and therefore tomee-myfaces does not compile
anymore after upgrading. I'm wondering if this is even required now.
I think Romain did most of the integration at that time but I haven't spent
much time on it quite yet. If you have a few minutes, the module is tiny,
maybe you can give your thoughts and some guidance and I'm happy to help
refactor or just remove the module and see where we are and what's needed
as opposed to migrating something we don't know about.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mojarra is final, in MyFaces we have already RC4 which is close to final.
>
> Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>
> > That's awesome. Is there any snapshot already?
> > I believe this is not final yet?
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are
> > ready
> > > actually
> > >
> > > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched to
> > > TomEE
> > > > 10 actively.
> > > >
> > > > For TomEE, here is the branch
> > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big now
> > > > because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
> > > >
> > > > Jakarta EE API has been updated
> > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
> > > >
> > > > Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
> > > > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story short, it
> > > > builds
> > > > and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining
> > > failures
> > > > are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
> > > >
> > > > For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on the
> > > code
> > > > base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
> > > >
> > > > Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it still
> > > > requires some work to pass the TCK
> > > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
> > > >
> > > > Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
> > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some
> > > discussions
> > > > regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how to
> > > > implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
> > > >
> > > > And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Mojarra is final, in MyFaces we have already RC4 which is close to final.
Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> That's awesome. Is there any snapshot already?
> I believe this is not final yet?
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are
> ready
> > actually
> >
> > Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched to
> > TomEE
> > > 10 actively.
> > >
> > > For TomEE, here is the branch
> > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big now
> > > because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
> > >
> > > Jakarta EE API has been updated
> > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
> > >
> > > Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
> > > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story short, it
> > > builds
> > > and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining
> > failures
> > > are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
> > >
> > > For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on the
> > code
> > > base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
> > >
> > > Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it still
> > > requires some work to pass the TCK
> > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
> > >
> > > Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
> > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some
> > discussions
> > > regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how to
> > > implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
> > >
> > > And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
> > >
> > > Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
That's awesome. Is there any snapshot already?
I believe this is not final yet?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are ready
> actually
>
> Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched to
> TomEE
> > 10 actively.
> >
> > For TomEE, here is the branch
> > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big now
> > because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
> >
> > Jakarta EE API has been updated
> > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
> >
> > Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
> > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story short, it
> > builds
> > and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining
> failures
> > are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
> >
> > For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on the
> code
> > base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
> >
> > Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it still
> > requires some work to pass the TCK
> > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
> >
> > Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
> > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some
> discussions
> > regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how to
> > implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
> >
> > And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
> >
> > Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
>
Re: Jakarta EE 10 status
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are ready
actually
Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched to TomEE
> 10 actively.
>
> For TomEE, here is the branch
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1005 --> it's fairly big now
> because it has also some additional standalone TCKs added.
>
> Jakarta EE API has been updated
> https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
>
> Apache Jonhzon has started to migrate to Jakarta as well
> https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/98 -->Long story short, it
> builds
> and I started fixing the code base to pass the TCK. The remaining failures
> are due to polymorphism. So it's clearly a feature gap
>
> For BVal, the PR, I just created the PR with some initial work on the code
> base and TCK fixes https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/16
>
> Apache BatchEE, I pushed straight to master by mistake, but it still
> requires some work to pass the TCK
> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee
>
> Apache OpenWebBeans is moving quite fast thanks to Mark
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/ ----> there are some discussions
> regarding the so-called "CDI Light". We'll need to figure out how to
> implement it (maybe a CDI Extension can be enough).
>
> And finally David is working hard on the platform TCK setup.
>
> Hopefully everything will meet at a single point.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>