CI for forks

[Matt Frantz <ma...@gmail.com>]

How can we support CI of some sort for forks of the TinkerPop repo?  I
assume that the loss of the Travis configuration is tied to Apache
incubation.

Re: CI for forks

[David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>]

So it may interest you to read:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci

--David

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Travis was insanely slow because we shared the apache account with all
> other projects using Travis (i'm referring more to the job queue here as
> being "slow").  We've since moved to Apache's hosting of Jenkins, but that
> build has been failing forever because the build server is well behind the
> version of Java 8 that we require.  I guess the short answer, is that I
> don't have a good answer for you.......
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Matt Frantz <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> How can we support CI of some sort for forks of the TinkerPop repo?  I
>> assume that the loss of the Travis configuration is tied to Apache
>> incubation.
>>

Re: CI for forks

[Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>]

Travis was insanely slow because we shared the apache account with all
other projects using Travis (i'm referring more to the job queue here as
being "slow").  We've since moved to Apache's hosting of Jenkins, but that
build has been failing forever because the build server is well behind the
version of Java 8 that we require.  I guess the short answer, is that I
don't have a good answer for you.......

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Matt Frantz <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> How can we support CI of some sort for forks of the TinkerPop repo?  I
> assume that the loss of the Travis configuration is tied to Apache
> incubation.
>