You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2002/01/23 07:36:07 UTC
APACHE_1_3_23...
...is broken, due to httpd-docs-1.3 missing that tag.
Mr. RM, could you fix?
Bill
Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Posted by Martin Kraemer <Ma...@Fujitsu-Siemens.com>.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:19:03AM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> The only breakage I saw was with src/.cvsignore. The tag log did not indicate any other
> errors. However, the htdocs directory was NOT populated by a simple cvs co apache-1.3.
> That's why no tags in the docco.
In your apache-1.3/CVS directory, is there the line
D/htdocs////
present? That is the "glue" between stuff from the apache-1.3 checkout
and the httpd-docs-1.3 sub-checkout. If it's missing, a recursive
descent will skip the directory htdocs/ and not tag stuff in there.
Martin
--
<Ma...@Fujitsu-Siemens.com> | Fujitsu Siemens
Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-47655 | 81730 Munich, Germany
Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
> > The only breakage I saw was with src/.cvsignore. The tag log did not indicate any
other
> > errors. However, the htdocs directory was NOT populated by a simple cvs co
apache-1.3.
> > That's why no tags in the docco.
>
> Yes - again [you asked] what flags did you pass to co (including .cvsrc) and what
> version of CVS are you using?
1.11.1p1
Nothing in .cvsrc (I like my CVS raw :-)
>
> Try cvs -f co -P apache-1.3 and see what you get, exactly, so you can eliminate
> cvs itself [-f will ignore your .cvsrc]. If it works [with htdocs] I expect you did
> a cvs up afterwards [which prunes off the htdocs, by default].
Yep, cvs update -d prunes the docs. That's what happened. How gnarley.
Bill
Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:19 AM
> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:58 AM
>
> > From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:29 AM
> >
> > > Humm...
> > > Okay, what undocumented step did I miss in tagging the release? I checked out
> > > apache-1.3 and tagged it. What was missed??
> >
> > Did you do _anything_ else? What flags [buried in .cvsrc, as well] did you use?
> > Which version of CVS were you using [for all to be cautious of]?
>
> The only breakage I saw was with src/.cvsignore. The tag log did not indicate any other
> errors. However, the htdocs directory was NOT populated by a simple cvs co apache-1.3.
> That's why no tags in the docco.
Yes - again [you asked] what flags did you pass to co (including .cvsrc) and what
version of CVS are you using?
Try cvs -f co -P apache-1.3 and see what you get, exactly, so you can eliminate
cvs itself [-f will ignore your .cvsrc]. If it works [with htdocs] I expect you did
a cvs up afterwards [which prunes off the htdocs, by default].
Bill
Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
> From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:29 AM
>
>
> > Humm...
> > Okay, what undocumented step did I miss in tagging the release? I checked out
apache-1.3
> > and tagged it. What was missed??
>
> Did you do _anything_ else? What flags [buried in .cvsrc, as well] did you use?
> Which version of CVS were you using [for all to be cautious of]?
>
> htdocs is _very_ fragile, it's why our model was broken since the split.
>
> Either the htdocs -repository- must be folded back to its old home in
> apache-1.3, or the apache-1.3/htdocs directory must be rm -rf'ed from cvs!
>
> By blasting htdocs out of apache-1.3, the system will no longer checkout,
> and immediately prune that tree on update with "No Longer in the Repository"
> emits. It will check the files out from the sub-module, and _leave_them_.
>
> Bill
The only breakage I saw was with src/.cvsignore. The tag log did not indicate any other
errors. However, the htdocs directory was NOT populated by a simple cvs co apache-1.3.
That's why no tags in the docco.
Bill
Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:29 AM
> Humm...
> Okay, what undocumented step did I miss in tagging the release? I checked out apache-1.3
> and tagged it. What was missed??
Did you do _anything_ else? What flags [buried in .cvsrc, as well] did you use?
Which version of CVS were you using [for all to be cautious of]?
htdocs is _very_ fragile, it's why our model was broken since the split.
Either the htdocs -repository- must be folded back to its old home in
apache-1.3, or the apache-1.3/htdocs directory must be rm -rf'ed from cvs!
By blasting htdocs out of apache-1.3, the system will no longer checkout,
and immediately prune that tree on update with "No Longer in the Repository"
emits. It will check the files out from the sub-module, and _leave_them_.
Bill
Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Humm...
Okay, what undocumented step did I miss in tagging the release? I checked out apache-1.3
and tagged it. What was missed??
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: <ji...@jaguNET.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:36 AM
Subject: APACHE_1_3_23...
> ...is broken, due to httpd-docs-1.3 missing that tag.
>
> Mr. RM, could you fix?
>
> Bill
>