You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Mike Matrigali (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/10/18 19:44:50 UTC
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-3054) lang/synonym.sql fails with weme 6.1
with junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Output at line 383
expected:<...1...> but was:<...2...>
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-3054:
----------------------------------
I think converting at least the problem part of this test to be assertion based would best approach. The order of the dependent objects is likely jvm dependent, my guess is on some hash table used to store them and then scan through them in a jvm specific order. The order of the messages doesn't really matter just that an error is encountered when trying this particular operation.
> lang/synonym.sql fails with weme 6.1 with junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Output at line 383 expected:<...1...> but was:<...2...>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3054
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3054
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Regression Test Failure
> Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>
> synonym(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.lang.LangScripts) failed:
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Output at line 383 expected:<...1...> but was:<...2...>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> at org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.CanonTestCase.compareCanon(CanonTestCase.java:100)
> at org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.ScriptTestCase.runTest(ScriptTestCase.java:124)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
> at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestCase.runBare(BaseTestCase.java:95)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestSetup.run(BaseTestSetup.java:57)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> at TimeRunner.main(TimeRunner.java:31)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.