You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2005/11/03 18:40:56 UTC
Re: child processing timeout
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ronan writes:
> getting quite a few of the following in the logs which are letting
> messages through unscanned.
> running a dedicated server serving 3 mtas.
> SA 3.1
> MTA exim 4.54
>
> Nov 3 03:05:44 dung spamd[11633]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
> (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 29131 bytes, got 2
> 0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN600> line 461.
> Nov 3 03:05:53 dung spamd[12035]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
> (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 65351 bytes, got 2
> 0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN96> line 707.
> Nov 3 03:05:54 dung spamd[12042]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
> (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 25206 bytes, got 2
> 0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN66> line 295.
> Nov 3 03:06:02 dung spamd[12046]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
> (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 29131 bytes, got 2
> 0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN69> line 461.
> Nov 3 03:06:07 dung spamd[12044]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
> (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 25295 bytes, got 2
> 0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN87> line 294.
> Nov 3 03:06:08 dung spamd[12046]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
> (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 25401 bytes, got 1
> 7520 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN76> line 258.
These are totally new ;) If you can track down a message
that causes this, a bug report would be welcome.
- --j.
>
> Nov 3 03:21:28 dung spamd[12035]: bayes: child processing timeout at
> /usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
> Nov 3 03:21:28 dung spamd[12042]: bayes: child processing timeout at
> /usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
> Nov 3 03:21:51 dung spamd[11946]: bayes: child processing timeout at
> /usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
> Nov 3 03:21:51 dung spamd[12039]: bayes: child processing timeout at
> /usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
> Nov 3 03:22:02 dung spamd[12046]: bayes: child processing timeout at
> /usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
> Nov 3 03:22:02 dung spamd[12043]: bayes: child processing timeout at
> /usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>
> Anyone have this or care to guess what it could be?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFDakuoMJF5cimLx9ARAibpAJ9C7DHffUAMbyj5uhIgvWt6Ve+ehQCfVlIC
mnYzNPMm1ENT1DoevQpa1kI=
=z5u4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: child processing timeout
Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
Ronan wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> These are totally new ;) If you can track down a message
>> that causes this, a bug report would be welcome.
>>
>> - --j.
>>
>>
>
> Are you looking for an example message or just headers or what?
> If you let me know ill have a hoke around and get one for ya!
Whatever triggers the bug. It's likely going to be the complete message
that triggers it.
Daryl
Re: child processing timeout
Posted by Ronan <r....@qub.ac.uk>.
Justin Mason wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Ronan writes:
>
>
>>getting quite a few of the following in the logs which are letting
>>messages through unscanned.
>>running a dedicated server serving 3 mtas.
>>SA 3.1
>>MTA exim 4.54
>>
>>Nov 3 03:05:44 dung spamd[11633]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
>>(Content-Length mismatch: Expected 29131 bytes, got 2
>>0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN600> line 461.
>>Nov 3 03:05:53 dung spamd[12035]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
>>(Content-Length mismatch: Expected 65351 bytes, got 2
>>0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN96> line 707.
>>Nov 3 03:05:54 dung spamd[12042]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
>>(Content-Length mismatch: Expected 25206 bytes, got 2
>>0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN66> line 295.
>>Nov 3 03:06:02 dung spamd[12046]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
>>(Content-Length mismatch: Expected 29131 bytes, got 2
>>0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN69> line 461.
>>Nov 3 03:06:07 dung spamd[12044]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
>>(Content-Length mismatch: Expected 25295 bytes, got 2
>>0440 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN87> line 294.
>>Nov 3 03:06:08 dung spamd[12046]: spamd: bad protocol: header error:
>>(Content-Length mismatch: Expected 25401 bytes, got 1
>>7520 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1671, <GEN76> line 258.
>>
>>
>
>These are totally new ;) If you can track down a message
>that causes this, a bug report would be welcome.
>
>- --j.
>
>
Are you looking for an example message or just headers or what?
If you let me know ill have a hoke around and get one for ya!
Ronan
>
>
>
>>Nov 3 03:21:28 dung spamd[12035]: bayes: child processing timeout at
>>/usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>>Nov 3 03:21:28 dung spamd[12042]: bayes: child processing timeout at
>>/usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>>Nov 3 03:21:51 dung spamd[11946]: bayes: child processing timeout at
>>/usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>>Nov 3 03:21:51 dung spamd[12039]: bayes: child processing timeout at
>>/usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>>Nov 3 03:22:02 dung spamd[12046]: bayes: child processing timeout at
>>/usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>>Nov 3 03:22:02 dung spamd[12043]: bayes: child processing timeout at
>>/usr/bin/spamd line 1085.
>>
>>Anyone have this or care to guess what it could be?
>>
>>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Exmh CVS
>
>iD8DBQFDakuoMJF5cimLx9ARAibpAJ9C7DHffUAMbyj5uhIgvWt6Ve+ehQCfVlIC
>mnYzNPMm1ENT1DoevQpa1kI=
>=z5u4
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>