[jira] [Updated] (SLING-10760) Converter ignores access control content and users/groups in .content.xml files

["Angela Schreiber (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Angela Schreiber updated SLING-10760:
-------------------------------------
    Summary: Converter ignores access control content and users/groups in .content.xml files  (was: Converter ignores access control content in .content.xml files)

> Converter ignores access control content and users/groups in .content.xml files
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-10760
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10760
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter
>            Reporter: Angela Schreiber
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: subtree_in_contentxml_policy.png, subtree_in_contentxml_sibling.png
>
>
> [~kpauls], while trying to find more edge cases that could cause SLING-10754, i noticed that not only sibling nodes but also access control content (like e.g. _rep:policy_ nodes) contained in a _.content.xml_ get installed by Jackrabbit Filevault even if those nodes are not covered by the corresponding {{WorkspaceFilter}}.
> It also seems that these package 'entries' are not spotted by the converter and thus the dedicated {{EntryHandler}} implementations that are intended to analyze and convert special content like e.g. access control (but probably not limited to that) are not triggered.
> In other words: content hidden in _.content.xml_ will not be properly converted but will be installed even if not covered by _filter.xml_ associated with the content package. I don't know if that actually intended behavior of Jackrabbit FileVault (the documentation clearly stating that everything should be covered by filter rules [0], section 'Usage for Import/Installation'), but if it is correct it might in the worse case require the converter to parse all _.content.xml_ files and delegate to the proper handler implementations.
> [~kwin], I would appreciate your input on the FileVault related question of this ticket. In particular: is it correct and intended that subnodes defined in _.content.xml_ get installed even if not covered by any filter rule?
> [0] https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/filter.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)