You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Dennis Kieselhorst <de...@apache.org> on 2019/12/23 09:25:32 UTC

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

Hi,

time flies, I haven't found much time to work on CXF this year but would love to get these changes done. Other projects (e.g. Spring and Hibernate Validator) already integrated the Jakarta changes, this makes it a bit easier for us. Locally it works quite well for me apart from the OSGi mess that I'm unable to solve.
 
I've just asked on the SM list for a release of SAAJ 1.4 spec bundle. Hopefully this will be the missing piece in the puzzle (as discussed in CXF-7910)...

Best,
Dennis

On 2019/01/11 00:34:52, Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> I will also take a look at the OSGi issues if not done yet.
> -------------
> Freeman(Yue) Fang
> 
> Red Hat, Inc. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > On Jan 11, 2019, at 2:59 AM, Andrey Redko <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Dennis,
> > 
> > I will take a look tonight if no one does it before me. Thanks!
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> >    Andriy Redko
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 10:51 AM Dennis Kieselhorst <mail@dekies.de wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>>> Let's focus on JAX-WS and JAX-RS (along with JAXB) for 3.3.0 as those
> >>>> are the main implementations that we are offering. Everything else can
> >>>> be done for 3.4.0.
> >>>> 
> >>> +1, assuming the JAX-WS upgrade is seamless. JAX-RS is already done
> >> right?
> >>> Then let's use a single version of JAXB for both JDK8 + 11.
> >> 
> >> Well relatively seamless. Can anyone support solving the OSGi issues?
> >> I've created branch
> >> https://github.com/apache/cxf/tree/CXF-7910_jakarta_jaxws-api for it.
> >> 
> >>>> I also agree that we should release soon (maybe next week?) and avoid
> >>>> another delay.
> >>>> 
> >>> Yep let's tentatively target a vote at the end of next week?
> >> 
> >> +1
> >> 
> >> Cheers
> >> Dennis
> >> 
> 
> 

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
I've created a jakarta branch a long time ago.
Should all be JakartaEE8 level. But might miss some specs still - it's work in progress.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/jakarta/

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 23.12.2019 um 10:25 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst <de...@apache.org>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> time flies, I haven't found much time to work on CXF this year but would love to get these changes done. Other projects (e.g. Spring and Hibernate Validator) already integrated the Jakarta changes, this makes it a bit easier for us. Locally it works quite well for me apart from the OSGi mess that I'm unable to solve.
> 
> I've just asked on the SM list for a release of SAAJ 1.4 spec bundle. Hopefully this will be the missing piece in the puzzle (as discussed in CXF-7910)...
> 
> Best,
> Dennis
> 
> On 2019/01/11 00:34:52, Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> I will also take a look at the OSGi issues if not done yet.
>> -------------
>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>> 
>> Red Hat, Inc. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 11, 2019, at 2:59 AM, Andrey Redko <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Dennis,
>>> 
>>> I will take a look tonight if no one does it before me. Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>>   Andriy Redko
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 10:51 AM Dennis Kieselhorst <mail@dekies.de wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Let's focus on JAX-WS and JAX-RS (along with JAXB) for 3.3.0 as those
>>>>>> are the main implementations that we are offering. Everything else can
>>>>>> be done for 3.4.0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> +1, assuming the JAX-WS upgrade is seamless. JAX-RS is already done
>>>> right?
>>>>> Then let's use a single version of JAXB for both JDK8 + 11.
>>>> 
>>>> Well relatively seamless. Can anyone support solving the OSGi issues?
>>>> I've created branch
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/tree/CXF-7910_jakarta_jaxws-api for it.
>>>> 
>>>>>> I also agree that we should release soon (maybe next week?) and avoid
>>>>>> another delay.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Yep let's tentatively target a vote at the end of next week?
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Dennis
>>>> 
>> 
>>