You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to log4cxx-user@logging.apache.org by CREMARENCO Cosmin <Co...@murex.com> on 2014/09/11 11:09:08 UTC

log4cxx xml config

Hello,

I would like to know if log4cxx (through the DOMConfigurator) accepts the same configuration options as log4j.
We are using log4cxx 0.10.0.

Thanks in advance,

Cosmin
*******************************

This e-mail contains information for the intended recipient only. It may contain proprietary material or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to distribute, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment to it. Murex cannot guarantee that it is virus free and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from its use. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify immediately the sender and delete the original email received, any attachments and all copies from your system.

Re: log4cxx xml config

Posted by Thorsten Schöning <ts...@am-soft.de>.

Guten Tag CREMARENCO Cosmin,
am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 um 13:27 schrieben Sie:

> Is there any doc containing differences between log4cxx and log4j? I wasn't able to find any.

There's none I'm aware of, you could of course publish your experience
here and we may start a survey of some kind with things known to not
work or such.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning       E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening@AM-SoFT.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...........05151-  9468- 55
Fax...............05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow

RE: log4cxx xml config

Posted by CREMARENCO Cosmin <Co...@murex.com>.

Thanks!

Is there any doc containing differences between log4cxx and log4j? I wasn't able to find any.

Cosmin

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoening@am-soft.de]
Envoyé : jeudi 11 septembre 2014 12:03
À : Log4CXX User
Objet : Re: log4cxx xml config

Guten Tag CREMARENCO Cosmin,
am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 um 11:09 schrieben Sie:

> I would like to know if log4cxx (through the DOMConfigurator) accepts
> the same configuration options as log4j.

It should mostly, but you won't know until you try. It depend son which appenders you have built in, some for Log4j added in the younger past surely won't be available etc.

> We are using log4cxx 0.10.0.

The available appenders didn't change much in current trunk, if I remember correctly, but they might became more reliable.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

--
Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening@AM-SoFT.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55
Fax...............05151- 9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow

*******************************

This e-mail contains information for the intended recipient only. It may contain proprietary material or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to distribute, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment to it. Murex cannot guarantee that it is virus free and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from its use. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify immediately the sender and delete the original email received, any attachments and all copies from your system.

Re: log4cxx xml config

Posted by Thorsten Schöning <ts...@am-soft.de>.

Guten Tag CREMARENCO Cosmin,
am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 um 11:09 schrieben Sie:

> I would like to know if log4cxx (through the DOMConfigurator)
> accepts the same configuration options as log4j.

It should mostly, but you won't know until you try. It depend son
which appenders you have built in, some for Log4j added in the younger
past surely won't be available etc.

> We are using log4cxx 0.10.0.

The available appenders didn't change much in current trunk, if I
remember correctly, but they might became more reliable.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning       E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening@AM-SoFT.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...........05151-  9468- 55
Fax...............05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow