You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by plasma <pl...@pchome.com.tw> on 2003/07/11 01:43:00 UTC

No compiled book.html in svn 0.25?

Hi,

  I tried to install subversion 0.25, and found there's no compiled
book.html in the tarball.  Does that mean the we need to compile the
svnbook ourselves from now on, or just our new release manager forgot
to compile it? (no offend. :)


plasma

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: No compiled book.html in svn 0.25?

Posted by Paul L Lussier <pl...@lanminds.com>.
In a message dated: 11 Jul 2003 12:06:58 CDT
Ben Collins-Sussman said:

>It's in the releases.txt file already, we just ignored it:
>
>  3. Create the release branch, check out a working copy of the
>      branch, run autogen.sh and ./configure in it.  Also, make sure
>      the working copy contains apr, apr-util, neon, and the Docbook
>      tools (XSL, FOP).
>
>Paul, just follow the instructions in doc/book/README to get the xslt
>stylesheets and FOP running in your working copy.  :-)

Ohh, okay.  I do have xslt and FOP, but in in my wc of /trunk.

I'll fix this next time. :)
-- 

Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853  E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE

	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.

	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: No compiled book.html in svn 0.25?

Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
Paul L Lussier <pl...@lanminds.com> writes:

>   plasma> Does that mean the we need to compile the svnbook ourselves
>   plasma> from now on, or just our new release manager forgot to
>   plasma> compile it? (no offend. :)
> 
>   Ben> Paul didn't compile the book stuff, because, well, it would
>   Ben> have made the release process even *more* complex.
> 
> I also didn't do it because there was no mention of this step in the 
> release.txt file.  What's the process for shipping a tar-ball with 
> pre-compiled docs?  I'll add it to the releases.txt file and try to 
> make sure this is done in the future if that's the concensus.

It's in the releases.txt file already, we just ignored it:

  3. Create the release branch, check out a working copy of the
      branch, run autogen.sh and ./configure in it.  Also, make sure
      the working copy contains apr, apr-util, neon, and the Docbook
      tools (XSL, FOP).

Paul, just follow the instructions in doc/book/README to get the xslt
stylesheets and FOP running in your working copy.  :-)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: No compiled book.html in svn 0.25?

Posted by Paul L Lussier <pl...@lanminds.com>.
  plasma> Does that mean the we need to compile the svnbook ourselves
  plasma> from now on, or just our new release manager forgot to
  plasma> compile it? (no offend. :)

  Ben> Paul didn't compile the book stuff, because, well, it would
  Ben> have made the release process even *more* complex.

I also didn't do it because there was no mention of this step in the 
release.txt file.  What's the process for shipping a tar-ball with 
pre-compiled docs?  I'll add it to the releases.txt file and try to 
make sure this is done in the future if that's the concensus.


  Ben> I mean, the latest version of the book *is* online all the time.

I can appreciate wanting the docs local.  When I'm using my laptop,
it's usually easier/faster to fire acroread or gv and read the docs
locally, especially if I don't have a net connection.  Though, to be 
honest, I usually compile the docs myself anyway, now that I know how 
to do that :)

Tell me what you want, and I'll try to provide it.

-- 

Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853  E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE

	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.

	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: No compiled book.html in svn 0.25?

Posted by plasma <pl...@pchome.com.tw>.
Sorry, the free mail service I'm using upgraded their mail server and
shut down service on the weekend.  Therefore I'm not able to receive
any mails until now.

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:41:14AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> plasma <pl...@pchome.com.tw> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >   I tried to install subversion 0.25, and found there's no compiled
> > book.html in the tarball.  Does that mean the we need to compile the
> > svnbook ourselves from now on, or just our new release manager forgot
> > to compile it? (no offend. :)
> 
> Honestly, I'm not sure here.  Paul didn't compile the book stuff,
> because, well, it would have made the release process even *more*
> complex.
> 
> Notice that the 0.25 tarball is only 5M instead of 7M.... that's
> because there's no huge HTML or PDF stuff in it.  I'm not sure if
> people really expect it or not.  I mean, the latest version of the
> book *is* online all the time.  I imagine the only people that "need"
> to compile the book are people who are packing up 3rd party tools
> (like the win32 installer, which creates a 'help' file).  But they're
> already compiling anyway.

Actually, compiling subversion book myself is fine with me.  I'm doing
Traditional Chinese translation (yap, I'm still doing it), and
compiling it is no difficult to me.

The reason why I'm asking it is I tried to update my devel/subversion
port (used on FreeBSD), and it complained about no taget for compiled
book.html.  If the port has to compile book.html, it must depend
libxslt and other depedencies.

But you are right, Sussman, that the book is always online.  I fogot
the online version of svnbook.  Maybe just another fetch command will
solve this problem for good. :)


plasma

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: No compiled book.html in svn 0.25?

Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
plasma <pl...@pchome.com.tw> writes:

> Hi,
> 
>   I tried to install subversion 0.25, and found there's no compiled
> book.html in the tarball.  Does that mean the we need to compile the
> svnbook ourselves from now on, or just our new release manager forgot
> to compile it? (no offend. :)

Honestly, I'm not sure here.  Paul didn't compile the book stuff,
because, well, it would have made the release process even *more*
complex.

Notice that the 0.25 tarball is only 5M instead of 7M.... that's
because there's no huge HTML or PDF stuff in it.  I'm not sure if
people really expect it or not.  I mean, the latest version of the
book *is* online all the time.  I imagine the only people that "need"
to compile the book are people who are packing up 3rd party tools
(like the win32 installer, which creates a 'help' file).  But they're
already compiling anyway.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org