You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Chris Burroughs (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/10 14:06:19 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-6683) BADNESS_THRESHOLD does not
working correctly with DynamicEndpointSnitch
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13896462#comment-13896462 ]
Chris Burroughs commented on CASSANDRA-6683:
--------------------------------------------
Earlier DES problems reported in CASSANDRA-6465
> BADNESS_THRESHOLD does not working correctly with DynamicEndpointSnitch
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6683
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6683
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Environment: Linux 3.8.0-33-generic
> Reporter: Kirill Bogdanov
> Labels: snitch
> Fix For: 2.0.5
>
>
> There is a problem in *DynamicEndpointSnitch.java* in sortByProximityWithBadness()
> Before calling sortByProximityWithScore we comparing each nodes score ratios to the badness threshold.
> {code}
> if ((first - next) / first > BADNESS_THRESHOLD)
> {
> sortByProximityWithScore(address, addresses);
> return;
> }
> {code}
> This is not always the correct comparison because *first* score can be less than *next* score and in that case we will compare a negative number with positive.
> The solution is to compute absolute value of the ratio:
> {code}
> if (Math.abs((first - next) / first) > BADNESS_THRESHOLD)
> {code}
> This issue causing an incorrect sorting of DCs based on their performance and affects performance of the snitch.
> Thanks.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)