You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/04/23 11:17:16 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (JCR-3579)
InternalVersionImpl.internalDetachPredecessor() and
internalDetachSuccessor() do not check for duplicates when updating
jcr:successors / jcr:predecessors
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13638900#comment-13638900 ]
Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-3579:
---------------------------------------
Do you have a test to share, which illustrates the issue?
> InternalVersionImpl.internalDetachPredecessor() and internalDetachSuccessor() do not check for duplicates when updating jcr:successors / jcr:predecessors
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3579
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3579
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: versioning
> Affects Versions: 2.2.13, 2.4.3, 2.6
> Reporter: Sergiy Shyrkov
> Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg
>
>
> We are using Jackrabbit 2.2.x branch (although the issue seems the same with 2.4.x and 2.6 so far I see).
> We have a maintenance job that runs periodically and purges the old unused versions of nodes to keep the versioning store and index in boundaries.
> The Job is using Jackrabbit Versioning API to remove versions.
> The org.apache.jackrabbit.core.version.InternalVersionHistoryImpl.removeVersion(Name) has the call to detaching the removed version from the version graph:
> // detach from the version graph
> v.internalDetach();
> which in turn calls InternalVersionImpl.internalDetachPredecessor() and internalDetachSuccessor() methods to update predecessors and successor.
> Those two methods are using List to calculate new values and store them in corresponding jcr:successors or jcr:predecessors properties.
> The only thing is there is no check for duplicates in those lists, so with the time we see that jcr:successors and jcr:predecessors have duplicates (and they are growing with each version removal :-)). See attached screenshot.
> From my feeling the internalDetachPredecessor() and internalDetachSuccessor() should rather use HashSet (or if the order is important a LinkedHashSet) instead of List to prevent storing duplicates.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira