Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14

[Oliver Deakin <ol...@googlemail.com>]

On 27/05/2010 08:33, Mark Hindess wrote:
> +1 votes from Catherine, Oliver, Tim, Nathan and myself.  No other
> votes, so the vote passes.
>
> Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
>
> The federated build trunk is now open for commits again but the java6
> branch will remain frozen until the 6.0M2 vote is concluded.
>
> I have uploaded binaries created from the signed sources to:
>
>    http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/rc/5.0/M14/
>
> Please sanity check these artefacts.  #

I unpacked the binaries for Windows x86 and ran the tests on them and it 
looks good to me. Had a little look through the tree just to make sure 
there wasn't anything obviously wrong and didn't see anything unusual.

Regards,
Oliver

> I plan to move these artefacts to
> the /dist/ tree for mirroring after 24 hours but please ask if you'd
> like more time.
>
> Regards,
>   Mark.
>
> In message<20...@d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com>,
> "Mark Hindess" writes:
>    
>> I have created signed source archives for revision r946978 of trunk
>> and made them available at:
>>
>>    http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/5.0M14/
>>
>> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
>> archives as 5.0 Milestone 14.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least three days, or until all binding
>> votes have been cast (if earlier).
>>
>> If the vote is successful, binary builds from these artifacts will be
>> made available on the download page, as usual.
>>      
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14

[Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>]

On 01/Jun/2010 18:04, Mark Hindess wrote:
> In message <4C...@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
>> On 27/05/2010 08:33, Mark Hindess wrote:
>>> +1 votes from Catherine, Oliver, Tim, Nathan and myself.  No other
>>> votes, so the vote passes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
>>>
>>> The federated build trunk is now open for commits again but the
>>> java6 branch will remain frozen until the 6.0M2 vote is concluded.
>>>
>>> I have uploaded binaries created from the signed sources to:
>>>
>>>    http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/rc/5.0/M14/
>>>
>>> Please sanity check these artefacts.
>> I unpacked the binaries for Windows x86 and ran the tests on them and 
>> it looks good to me. Had a little look through the tree just to make  
>> sure                                                                  
> 
> Thanks Oliver.
> 
>>> I plan to move these artefacts to the /dist/ tree for mirroring
>>> after 24 hours but please ask if you'd like more time.
> 
> I'm not happy that there has been enough sanity checking of the releases
> yet so I've not moved the artefacts to the dist tree yet.
> 
> Please can anyone (particularly PMC members who are supposed to be
> providing oversight for releases) sanity check them and report to the
> list?

Sanity checked ok for me -- took a long time to download them all though!

Just an observation.  Maybe we should not bother to include the
*-src.jar in the JREs.  We only include pdb's/.dbg's in the JDK, maybe
only include src in the JDK's too?

Regards,
Tim

Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14

[Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>]

In message <4C...@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
>
> On 27/05/2010 08:33, Mark Hindess wrote:
> > +1 votes from Catherine, Oliver, Tim, Nathan and myself.  No other
> > votes, so the vote passes.
> >
> > Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
> >
> > The federated build trunk is now open for commits again but the
> > java6 branch will remain frozen until the 6.0M2 vote is concluded.
> >
> > I have uploaded binaries created from the signed sources to:
> >
> >    http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/rc/5.0/M14/
> >
> > Please sanity check these artefacts.
> 
> I unpacked the binaries for Windows x86 and ran the tests on them and 
> it looks good to me. Had a little look through the tree just to make  
> sure                                                                  

Thanks Oliver.

> > I plan to move these artefacts to the /dist/ tree for mirroring
> > after 24 hours but please ask if you'd like more time.

I'm not happy that there has been enough sanity checking of the releases
yet so I've not moved the artefacts to the dist tree yet.

Please can anyone (particularly PMC members who are supposed to be
providing oversight for releases) sanity check them and report to the
list?

Regards,
 Mark.